824 resultados para 310100 Architecture and Urban Environment
Resumo:
"HUD-570-PDR (2)."
Resumo:
"August 1992."
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
"An edited version of the report Professional liability and responsibility, prepared in collaboration with the Subcommittee on Professional Liability and Responsibility of American Institute of Architects-Engineers Joint Council Liaison Committee."
Resumo:
Shipping list no.: 95-0029-P (v. 1), 95-0027-P (v. 2), 95-0194-P (v. 3, 11), 95-0187-P (v. 4, 9, 14), 95-0177-P (v. 5, 8, 13, 17), 95-0205-P (v. 6), 95-0176-P (v. 10, 15-16, 18), 95-0121-P (v. 12), 95-0188-P (v. 19), 95-0185-P (v. 20-21, 23), 95-0199-P (v. 22), 95-0195-P (v. 24).
Resumo:
"Printed for the use of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs."
Resumo:
Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2016-06
Resumo:
Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2016-06
Resumo:
The statement. 'it is hard to be green when you are in the red' is commonly used by pnmary producers to explain the necessity of placing a greater emphasis on financial survival rather than longer term environmental sustainability. The subject of environmental sustainabilty on pastoral properties was explored during face-to:face interviews with cattle graziers in the Filzroy Basin area of Central Queensland. Findings from the study suggest that while economic factors are important, they are not the only determinant in whether a landholder prioritises environmental sustainability, Rather. social factors such as knowledge claims. beliefs, attitudes. values, peer pressure and social sanctioning, constructed and enacted within the productivist paradigm of primary production. play a crucial role in how landholders manage their natural assets. This suggests that the edict that 'It is hard to be green when you are in the red' is inaccurate and does not explain why conservation-focused pastoral management is not yet occurring on a large scale
Resumo:
Background and objective: Prescribers in rural and remote locations perceive that there are different influences on their prescribing compared with those experienced by urban prescribers. The aim of this study was to compare the motivations and perceived influences on general practitioners (GPs) when prescribing COX-2 inhibitors rather than conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) between rural and urban-based GPs in Queensland, Australia. Methods: A questionnaire was administered to two geographically distinct groups of GPs, one urban (n = 67) and one rural (n = 67), investigating the reasons that the GP would prescribe a COX-2 inhibitor rather than a conventional NSAID or vice versa and also focusing on patients requesting a prescription for a COX-2 inhibitor. Results and discussion: A 51% response rate (n = 68) was achieved. The difference between the rural and the urban GPs was that the urban GPs were more likely to perceive that they were influenced to prescribe COX-2 inhibitors by their patients' knowledge of these new (at the time) drugs. GPs in both the rural and urban areas perceived the COX-2 selective inhibitors to be safer than conventional NSAIDs, and that there was little difference in terms of efficacy between the two drug classes. However, GPs from both of the study areas stated that conventional NSAIDs were preferred over COX-2 selective inhibitors, primarily due to their expense, if their patients were not at risk for developing a GI bleed. Conclusion: The motivations and perceived influences to prescribe a COX-2 inhibitor in rural and in urban areas of Queensland, Australia were very similar. Almost all surveyed GPs in rural and urban areas had patients request a prescription, or enquire about the COX-2 inhibitors. Urban GPs were more likely to feel pressured to prescribe a COX-2 inhibitor than their rural counterparts, agreeing with other research which found that patient pressure to prescribe appears to be greater in urban general practice.