Dimethylsulfide dehydrogenase from rhodovulum sulfidophilum: EPR spectroscopy and biochemical analysis reveal its place in the DMSO reductase family of molybdenum enzymes

Dimethylsulfide (DMS) dehydrogenase catalyses the oxidation of DMS to dimethylsulfoxide. The purified enzyme has three subunits of Mr = 94, 38 and 32 kDa and has an optical spectrum dominated by a b-type cytochrome. The metal ion and nucleotide analysis revealed 0.5 g-atom Mo, 9.8 g-atom Fe and 1.96 mol GMP per tool of enzyme. Taken together, these data indicate that DMS dehydrogenase contains a bis(MGD)Mo cofactor. A comparison of the Nterminal amino acid sequence of DMS dehydrogenase revealed that the Mo-containing ct-subunit was most closely related to the c~-subunits of nitrate reductase (NarG) and selenate reductase (SerA). Similarly, the [~-subunit of DMS dehydrogenase was most closely related to the [3-subunits of nitrate reductase (NarH) and selenate reductase (SerB). Variable temperature X-band EPR spectra (120-2K) of 'as isolated' DMS dehydrogenase showed resonances arising from multiple redox centres, Mo(V), [3Fe-4S] +, [4Fe-4S] ÷. A pH dependent EPR study of the Mo(V) centre in lH20 and 2H20 reveals the presence of three Mo(V) species in equilibrium, Mo(V)-OH2, Mo(V)-X and Mo(V)-OH. Between pH6 and 8.2 the dominant species is Mo(V)-OH2 and Mo(V)-X is a minor component. X is probably the anion, chloride. Comparison of the rhombicity and anisotropy parameters for the Mo(V) species in DMS dehydrogenase with other Mo(V) centres in metalloproteins showed that it was most similar to the low pH nitrite spectrum of E. coli nitrate reductase (NarGHI). The spin Hamiltonian parameters (2.0158, 1.8870, 1.8620) for the [4Fe-4S] + cluster suggests the presence of histidine (N) coordination to iron in this cluster. It is suggested that this unusual [Fe-S] cluster may be associated with a histidine-cysteine rich sequence at the N-terminus of the ct-subunit of DMS dehydrogenase.

Tumor-host interactions

A number of malignant tumors interact with the host to cause a syndrome of cachexia, characterized by extensive loss of adipose tissue and skeletal muscle mass, but with preservation of proteins in visceral tissues. Although anorexia is frequently present, the body composition changes in cancer cachexia cannot be explained by nutritional deprivation alone. Loss of skeletal muscle mass is a result of depression in protein synthesis and an increase in protein degradation. The main degradative pathway that has been found to have increased expression and activity in the skeletal muscle of cachectic patients is the ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway. Cachexia-inducing tumors produce catabolic factors such as proteolysis-inducing factor (PIF), a 24 kDa sulfated glycoprotein, which inhibit protein synthesis and stimulate degradation of intracellular proteins in skeletal muscle by inducing an increased expression of regulatory components of the ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway. While the oligosaccharide chains in PIF are required to initiate protein degradation the central polypeptide core may act as a growth and survival factor. Only cachexia-inducing tumors are capable of elaborating fully glycosylated PIF, and the selectivity of production possibly rests with the acquisition of the necessary glycosylating enzymes, rather than expressing the gene for the polypeptide core. Loss of adipose tissue is probably the result of an increase in catabolism rather than a defect in anabolism. A lipid mobilizing factor (LMF), identical with the plasma protein Zn-α2-glycoprotein (ZAG) is found in the urine of cachectic cancer patients and is produced by tumors causing a decrease in carcass lipid. LMF causes triglyceride hydrolysis in adipose tissue through a cyclic AMP-mediated process by interaction with a β3-adrenoreceptor. Thus, by producing circulating factors certain malignant tumors are able to interfere with host metabolism even without metastasis to that particular site. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.