Community Education Needs to be Supported by Strong Public Policy to Tackle Food Poverty

Community education needs to be supported by strong public policy if it is to be fully effective at tackling food poverty and obesity, a project evaluation by the Institute of Public Health in Ireland (IPH) has found. In its evaluation of Decent Food for All (DFfA) - a major project to improve community diet and health - IPH found that where people live and shop had a greater impact on their diet than their own individual awareness and attitudes. Access Tackling Food Poverty: lessons from the Decent Food for All intervention at www.publichealth.ie DFfA was funded by safefood (the Food Safety Promotion Board) and the Food Standards Agency Northern Ireland. The project lasted four years and included hundreds of community education activities designed to improve diet in poorer parts of Armagh and South Tyrone. safefood commissioned IPH to undertake the evaluation of DFfA. Dr. Kevin Balanda, IPH Associate Director, said 'The aim of the project was to reduce food poverty (this is defined as not being able to consume adequate healthy food) and improve health in the target communities. DFfA delivered over 370 core activities to 3,100 residents including local education talks on diet, cookery workshops, fresh fruit in schools, healthy food tastings and information stands. One in eight residents in the target areas participated in at least one of these activities.' The evaluation found that over 1 in 5 adults in the target areas reported they had cut their weekly food spending in the last six months to pay other household bills such as rent, electricity and gas. During the four years of the DFfA activities, this percentage had not changed significantly. There were mixed changes in the nature of food in local stores. While the overall availability and price of food increased, both ﾓhealthierﾔ food and ﾓunhealthierﾔ food were included in that increase. It was only in the larger ﾓmultiple/discount freezerﾔ type of shops that the overall price of food had decreased.

Review of Health Impact Assessment for the Institute of Public Health in Ireland

IPH commissioned a review of HIA work in 2009 to detail progress and achievements of HIA from 2001. This included an assessment of current levels of HIA awareness and activity and suggestions for the direction of future work.

Health Impact Assessment contributing to Healthy Public Policy

Published by Public Health, April 2009 IPH recently coordinated and was guest editor for a minisymposium on Health Impact Assessment for the journal, Public Health. Three aricles contributed to the minisymposium which included an article from IPH on how HIA can contribute to healthy public policy. An article reviewing the right to the highest attainable standard of health from Paul Hunt and Gillian MacNaughton and a review of the strengths and weakneses of quantitiative methods used in HIA from Emer O'Connell and Fintan Hurley. The minisymposium evolved from the 8th International HIA conference ‘Healthy Public Policy – is Health Impact Assessment the Cornerstone’ hosted by IPH.

Seminar Report: Translating Research into Better Public Health: What Does it Mean for the CoE(NI)?

The workshop was attended by 13 people excluding facilitators. Most were from outside QUB (including Belfast City Council, NHSSB, BHSCT, Centre for Public Health, NICR, Institute of Agri-food and Land Use (QUB), etc).Programme was:Introductions Part 1: What’s “knowledge brokerage” all about?Presentation and Q&A (Kevin Balanda)Small group discussions Part 2: What the Centre of Excellence is doingPresentation and Q&A (Kevin Balanda)Small group discussions

Public Health in Europe - The Irish Connection

This background paper details the work undertaken by the Institute to explore the potential for international collaboration in order to contribute to public health development in Ireland. It makes specific reference to the European Commission's proposal for a new programme of community action in the field of public health for 2001-2006.

IPH response to Department for Regional Development public transport reform consultation

This is the IPH response to the Department for Regional Development's public transport reform consultation.

DHSSPS Consultation on smoking in enclosed public places and workplaces

The Institute of Public Health welcomes the current consultation on smoking in enclosed workplaces and public places. Having considered the three options given the Institute strongly supports option 5c – “a total ban on smoking in all enclosed workplaces and public places”. This clearly outlines that a total ban on smoking in all enclosed public places and workplaces is the only option which will adequately protect the health of all workers and contribute to reducing the prevalence of smoking in the population of Northern Ireland.As an organisation set up to promote North South co-operation we believe that a similar approach to smoking in public places and workplaces should be taken to that in the Republic of Ireland where there is clear evidence that such policies are practical, well supported and effective.

Institute of Public Health in Ireland's (IPH) Open Access Statement

This document states the Institute of Public Health in Ireland’s (IPH) commitment to an Open Access policy and outlines how it implements that policy. "Open Access is the immediate, online, free availability of research outputs without restrictions on use commonly imposed by publisher copyright agreements. Open Access includes the outputs that scholars normally give away for free for publication; it includes peer-reviewed journal articles, conference papers and data of various kinds."1 The Open Access (OA) movement aims to: Provide access to scientific outputs in publications that are freely available Foster the adoption of open access publication models

Littérature contemporaine et engagement : quand les textes interpellent la réalité postmoderne et néolibérale

La littérature peut‐elle s'engager pour un monde où le néolibéralisme s'est érigé en triomphe sur les décombres des idéologies rivales ? Où la postmodernité a laissé la société orpheline de ses anciens repères collectifs ? Fondée sur des questions liant le roman français contemporain et des courants de pensée tels que la postmodernité ou le néolibéralisme, cette thèse de doctorat propose une réflexion autour de l'engagement littéraire, dans son acception à la fin du XXe siècle ; autrement dit, une redéfinition de la notion en accord avec les enjeux socio‐économiques contemporains. « Que peut la littérature ? » demandait Sartre en 1947 : cette question, nous la portons sur la fin du XXe siècle. La première partie de cette étude s'intéresse aux écrivains contemporains et mesure les similitudes qui attestent d'une filiation avec la compréhension sartrienne de l'engagement littéraire ou, au contraire, les distinctions qui entérinent une rupture. La deuxième partie témoigne qu'il ne peut y avoir d'engagement littéraire sans prise en considération du monde. La postmodernité et le néolibéralisme : ces deux courants sont interrogés tour à tour dans leur spécificité propre, avant d'interroger la pertinence du rapprochement entre discours littéraire et socio‐économique. L'originalité de cette thèse est de proposer ensuite une définition de l'engagement littéraire contemporain, ainsi qu'une réflexion sur les conditions nécessaires à son expression. La troisième partie est consacrée aux formes littéraires. L'hypothèse faisant de la littérature le révélateur du « surplomb problématique » d'une époque (Wolfgang Iser) s'impose comme le fil conducteur qui relie les textes du corpus : l'agencement des thèmes, les personnages, les emprunts à différentes traditions et les registres de langue constituent autant de variations possibles inscrivant l'hypothèse d'un « individu travaillant » aliéné au sein du texte. Ouvriers, mais aussi employés du secteur tertiaire, ou cadres, reconquièrent par l'entremise de la fiction - qui les met en vedette - une partie de leur visibilité perdue dans la sphère publique.