Ruolo di Clusterina nella progressione del tumore prostatico

Clusterina (CLU) è una proteina ubiquitaria, presente nella maggior parte dei fluidi corporei e implicata in svariati processi fisiologici. Dalla sua scoperta fino ad oggi, CLU è risultata essere una proteina enigmatica, la cui funzione non è ancora stata compresa appieno. Il gene codifica per 3 varianti trascrizionali identificate nel database NCBI con i codici: NM_001831 (CLU 1 in questo lavoro di tesi), NR_038335 (CLU 2 in questo lavoro di tesi) e NR_045494 (CLU 3 in questo lavoro di tesi). Tutte le varianti sono trascritte come pre-mRNA contenenti 9 esoni e 8 introni e si differenziano per l’esone 1, la cui sequenza è unica e caratteristica di ogni variante. Sebbene in NCBI sia annotato che le varianti CLU 2 e CLU 3 non sono codificanti, tramite analisi bioinformatica è stato predetto che da tutti e tre i trascritti possono generarsi proteine di differente lunghezza e localizzazione cellulare. Tra tutte le forme proteiche ipotizzate, l’unica a essere stata isolata e sequenziata è quella tradotta dall’AUG presente sull’esone 2 che dà origine a una proteina di 449 aminoacidi. Il processo di maturazione prevede la formazione di un precursore citoplasmatico (psCLU) che subisce modificazioni post-traduzionali tra cui formazione di ponti disolfuro, glicosilazioni, taglio in due catene denominate β e α prima di essere secreta come eterodimero βα (sCLU) nell’ambiente extracellulare, dove esercita la sua funzione di chaperone ATP-indipendente. Oltre alla forma extracellulare, è possibile osservare una forma intracellulare con localizzazione citosolica la cui funzione non è stata ancora completamente chiarita. Questo lavoro di tesi si è prefissato lo scopo di incrementare le conoscenze in merito ai trascritti CLU 1 e CLU 2 e alla loro regolazione, oltre ad approfondire il ruolo della forma citosolica della proteina in relazione al signaling di NF-kB che svolge un ruolo importante nel processo di sviluppo e metastatizzazione del tumore. Nella prima parte, uno screening di differenti linee cellulari, quali cellule epiteliali di prostata e di mammella, sia normali sia tumorali, fibroblasti di origine polmonare e linfociti di tumore non-Hodgkin, ha permesso di caratterizzare i trascritti CLU 1 e CLU 2. Dall’analisi è emerso che la sequenza di CLU 1 è più corta al 5’ rispetto a quella depositata in NCBI con l’identificativo NM_001831 e il primo AUG disponibile per l’inizio della traduzione è localizzato sull’esone 2. È stato dimostrato che CLU 2, al contrario di quanto riportato in NCBI, è tradotto in proteina a partire dall’AUG presente sull’esone 2, allo stesso modo in cui viene tradotto CLU 1. Inoltre, è stato osservato che i livelli d’espressione dei trascritti variano notevolmente tra le diverse linee cellulari e nelle cellule epiteliali CLU 2 è espressa sempre a bassi livelli. In queste cellule, l’espressione di CLU 2 è silenziata per via epigenetica e la somministrazione di farmaci capaci di rendere la cromatina più accessibile, quali tricostatina A e 5-aza-2’-deossicitidina, è in grado di incrementarne l’espressione. Nella seconda parte, un’analisi bioinformatica seguita da saggi di attività in vitro in cellule epiteliali prostatiche trattate con farmaci epigenetici, hanno permesso di identificare, per la prima volta in uomo, una seconda regione regolatrice denominata P2, capace di controllare l’espressione di CLU 2. Rispetto a P1, il classico promotore di CLU già ampiamente studiato da altri gruppi di ricerca, P2 è un promotore debole, privo di TATA box, che nelle cellule epiteliali prostatiche è silente in condizioni basali e la cui attività incrementa in seguito alla somministrazione di farmaci epigenetici capaci di alterare le modificazioni post-traduzionali delle code istoniche nell’intorno di P2. Ne consegue un rilassamento della cromatina e un successivo aumento di trascrizione di CLU 2. La presenza di un’isola CpG differentemente metilata nell’intorno di P1 spiegherebbe, almeno in parte, i differenti livelli di espressione di CLU che si osservano tra le diverse linee cellulari. Nella terza parte, l’analisi del pathway di NF-kB in un modello sperimentale di tumore prostatico in cui CLU è stata silenziata o sovraespressa, ha permesso di capire come la forma citosolica di CLU abbia un ruolo inibitorio nei confronti dell’attività del fattore trascrizionale NF-kB. CLU inibisce la fosforilazione e l’attivazione di p65, il membro più rappresentativo della famiglia NF-kB, con conseguente riduzione della trascrizione di alcuni geni da esso regolati e coinvolti nel rimodellamento della matrice extracellulare, quali l’urochinasi attivatrice del plasminogeno, la catepsina B e la metallo proteinasi 9. È stato dimostrato che tale inibizione non è dovuta a un’interazione fisica diretta tra CLU e p65, per cui si suppone che CLU interagisca con uno dei componenti più a monte della via di segnalazione responsabile della fosforilazione ed attivazione di p65.

Biochemical and functional characterization of the tumor suppressors BRCA1 and BAP1

L’ubiquitination est une modification post-traductionnelle qui joue un rôle majeur dans la régulation d’une multitude de processus cellulaires. Dans cette thèse, je discuterai de la caractérisation de deux protéines, BRCA1 et BAP1, soit deux suppresseurs de tumeurs fonctionnellement reliés. BRCA1, une ubiquitine ligase qui catalyse la liaison de l’ubiquitine à une protéine cible, est mutée dans les cancers du sein et de l'ovaire. Il est bien établi que cette protéine aide à maintenir la stabilité génomique suite à un bris double brin de l’ADN (BDB), et ce, à l’aide d’un mécanisme de réparation bien caractérisé appelé recombinaison homologue. Cependant, les mécanismes de régulation de BRCA1 suite à des stresses génotoxiques n’impliquant pas directement un BDB ne sont pas pleinement élucidés. Nous avons démontré que BRCA1 est régulée par dégradation protéasomale suite à une exposition des cellules à deux agents génotoxiques reconnus pour ne pas directement générer des BDBs, soit les rayons UV, qui provoquent la distorsion de l’hélice d’ADN, et le méthyle méthanesulfonate (MMS), qui entraîne l’alkylation de l’ADN. La dégradation de BRCA1 est réversible et indépendante des kinases associées à la voie des PI3 kinase, soit ATM, ATR et DNA-PK, protéines qui sont rapidement activées par les dommages à l’ADN. Nous proposons que la dégradation de BRCA1 prévienne son recrutement intempestif, ainsi que celui des facteurs qui lui sont associés, à des sites de dommages d’ADN qui ne sont pas des BDBs, et que cette régulation coordonne la réparation de l’ADN. L’enzyme de déubiquitination BAP1 a initialement été identifiée comme une protéine capable d’interagir avec BRCA1 et de réguler sa fonction. Elle est également connue pour sa capacité à se lier avec les protéines du groupe Polycomb, ASXL1 et ASXL2. Cependant, l’importance de ces interactions n’a toujours pas été établie. Nous avons démontré que BAP1 forme deux complexes protéiques mutuellement exclusifs avec ASXL1 et ASXL2. Ces interactions sont critiques pour la liaison de BAP1 à l’ubiquitine ainsi que pour la stimulation de son activité enzymatique envers l’histone H2A. Nous avons également identifié des mutations de BAP1 dérivées de cancers qui empêchent à la fois son interaction avec ASXL1 et AXSL2, et son activité de déubiquitinase, ce qui fournit un lien mécanistique direct entre la déubiquitination de H2A et la tumorigenèse. Élucider les mécanismes de régulation de BRCA1 et BAP1 menera à une meilleure compréhension de leurs rôles de suppresseurs de tumeurs, permettant ainsi d’établir de nouvelles stratégies de diagnostic et traitement du cancer.

Reductionism at the vertebrate kinetochore

The kinetochore forms the site of attachment for mitotic spindle microtubules driving chromosome segregation. The interdependent protein interactions in this large structure have made it difficult to dissect the function of its components. In this issue, Hori et al. (2013. J. Cell Biol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201210106) present a novel and powerful methodology to address the sufficiency of individual proteins for the creation of a functional de novo centromere.

Epigenetic engineering shows H3K4me2 is required for HJURP targeting and CENP-A assembly on a synthetic human kinetochore

Kinetochores assemble on distinct 'centrochromatin' containing the histone H3 variant CENP-A and interspersed nucleosomes dimethylated on H3K4 (H3K4me2). Little is known about how the chromatin environment at active centromeres governs centromeric structure and function. Here, we report that centrochromatin resembles K4-K36 domains found in the body of some actively transcribed housekeeping genes. By tethering the lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1), we specifically depleted H3K4me2, a modification thought to have a role in transcriptional memory, from the kinetochore of a synthetic human artificial chromosome (HAC). H3K4me2 depletion caused kinetochores to suffer a rapid loss of transcription of the underlying α-satellite DNA and to no longer efficiently recruit HJURP, the CENP-A chaperone. Kinetochores depleted of H3K4me2 remained functional in the short term, but were defective in incorporation of CENP-A, and were gradually inactivated. Our data provide a functional link between the centromeric chromatin, α-satellite transcription, maintenance of CENP-A levels and kinetochore stability.

Cdk Activity Couples Epigenetic Centromere Inheritance to Cell Cycle Progression

Centromeres form the site of chromosome attachment to microtubules during mitosis. Identity of these loci is maintained epigenetically by nucleosomes containing the histone H3 variant CENP-A. Propagation of CENP-A chromatin is uncoupled from DNA replication initiating only during mitotic exit. We now demonstrate that inhibition of Cdk1 and Cdk2 activities is sufficient to trigger CENP-A assembly throughout the cell cycle in a manner dependent on the canonical CENP-A assembly machinery. We further show that the key CENP-A assembly factor Mis18BP1(HsKNL2) is phosphorylated in a cell cycle-dependent manner that controls its centromere localization during mitotic exit. These results strongly support a model in which the CENP-A assembly machinery is poised for activation throughout the cell cycle but kept in an inactive noncentromeric state by Cdk activity during S, G2, and M phases. Alleviation of this inhibition in G1 phase ensures tight coupling between DNA replication, cell division, and subsequent centromere maturation.

Temporal control of epigenetic centromere specification

All living organisms require accurate mechanisms to faithfully inherit their genetic material during cell division. The centromere is a unique locus on each chromosome that supports a multiprotein structure called the kinetochore. During mitosis, the kinetochore is responsible for connecting chromosomes to spindle microtubules, allowing faithful segregation of the duplicated genome. In most organisms, centromere position and function is not defined by the local DNA sequence context but rather by an epigenetic chromatin-based mechanism. Centromere protein A (CENP-A) is central to this process, as chromatin assembled from this histone H3 variant is essential for assembly of the centromere complex, as well as for its epigenetic maintenance. As a major determinant of centromere function, CENP-A assembly requires tight control, both in its specificity for the centromere and in timing of assembly. In the last few years, there have been several new insights into the molecular mechanism that allow this process to occur. We will review these here and discuss the general implications of the mechanism of cell cycle coupling of centromere inheritance.

How two become one: HJURP dimerization drives CENP-A assembly

CENP‐A containing nucleosomes epigenetically specify centromere position on chromosomes. Deposition of CENP‐A into chromatin is mediated by HJURP, a specific CENP‐A chaperone. Paradoxically, HJURP binding sterically prevents dimerization of CENP‐A, which is critical to form functional centromeric nucleosomes. A recent publication in The EMBO Journal (Zasadzińska et al, 2013) demonstrates that HJURP itself dimerizes through a C‐terminal repeat region, which is essential for centromeric assembly of nascent CENP‐A.

A two-step mechanism for epigenetic specification of centromere identity and function

The basic determinant of chromosome inheritance, the centromere, is specified in many eukaryotes by an epigenetic mark. Using gene targeting in human cells and fission yeast, chromatin containing the centromere-specific histone H3 variant CENP-A is demonstrated to be the epigenetic mark that acts through a two-step mechanism to identify, maintain and propagate centromere function indefinitely. Initially, centromere position is replicated and maintained by chromatin assembled with the centromere-targeting domain (CATD) of CENP-A substituted into H3. Subsequently, nucleation of kinetochore assembly onto CATD-containing chromatin is shown to require either the amino- or carboxy-terminal tail of CENP-A for recruitment of inner kinetochore proteins, including stabilizing CENP-B binding to human centromeres or direct recruitment of CENP-C, respectively.

Basic properties of epigenetic systems: lessons from the centromere

Chromatin-based epigenetic inheritance cooperates with cis-acting DNA sequence information to propagate gene expression states and chromosome architecture across cell division cycles. Histone proteins and their modifications are central components of epigenetic systems but how, and to what extent, they are propagated is a matter of continued debate. Centromeric nucleosomes, marked by the histone H3 variant CENP-A, are stable across mitotic divisions and are assembled in a locus specific and cell cycle controlled manner. The mechanism of inheritance of this unique chromatin domain has important implications for how general nucleosome transmission is controlled in space and time.

CENP-C reshapes and stabilizes CENP-A nucleosomes at the centromere

Inheritance of each chromosome depends upon its centromere. A histone H3 variant, centromere protein A (CENP-A), is essential for epigenetically marking centromere location. We find that CENP-A is quantitatively retained at the centromere upon which it is initially assembled. CENP-C binds to CENP-A nucleosomes and is a prime candidate to stabilize centromeric chromatin. Using purified components, we find that CENP-C reshapes the octameric histone core of CENP-A nucleosomes, rigidifies both surface and internal nucleosome structure, and modulates terminal DNA to match the loose wrap that is found on native CENP-A nucleosomes at functional human centromeres. Thus, CENP-C affects nucleosome shape and dynamics in a manner analogous to allosteric regulation of enzymes. CENP-C depletion leads to rapid removal of CENP-A from centromeres, indicating their collaboration in maintaining centromere identity.

Regulation of Nuclear Factor κB (NF-κB) Transcriptional Activity via p65 Acetylation by the Chaperonin Containing TCP1 (CCT)

The NF-κB family member p65 is central to inflammation and immunity. The purpose of this study was to identify and characterize evolutionary conserved genes modulating p65 transcriptional activity. Using an RNAi screening approach, we identified chaperonin containing TCP1 subunit η (CCTη) as a regulator of Drosophila NF-κB proteins, Dorsal and Dorsal-related immunity factor (Dif). CCTη was also found to regulate NF-κB-driven transcription in mammalian cells, acting in a promoter-specific context, downstream of IκB kinase (IKK). CCTη knockdown repressed IκBα and CXCL2/MIP2 transcription during the early phase of NF-κB activation while impairing the termination of CCL5/RANTES and CXCL10/IP10 transcription. The latter effect was associated with increased DNA binding and reduced p65 acetylation, presumably by altering the activity of histone acetyltransferase CREB-binding protein (CBP). We identified p65 lysines (K) 122 and 123 as target residues mediating the CCTη-driven termination of NF-κB-dependent transcription. We propose that CCTη regulates NF-κB activity in a manner that resolves inflammation.

Disengaging the Smc3/kleisin interface releases cohesin from Drosophila chromosomes during interphase and mitosis

Cohesin's Smc1, Smc3, and kleisin subunits create a tripartite ring within which sister DNAs are entrapped. Evidence suggests that DNA enters through a gate created by transient dissociation of the Smc1/3 interface. Release at the onset of anaphase is triggered by proteolytic cleavage of kleisin. Less well understood is the mechanism of release at other stages of the cell cycle, in particular during prophase when most cohesin dissociates from chromosome arms in a process dependent on the regulatory subunit Wapl. We show here that Wapl-dependent release from salivary gland polytene chromosomes during interphase and from neuroblast chromosome arms during prophase is blocked by translational fusion of Smc3's C-terminus to kleisin's N-terminus. Our findings imply that proteolysis-independent release of cohesin from chromatin is mediated by Wapl-dependent escape of DNAs through a gate created by transient dissociation of the Smc3/kleisin interface. Thus, cohesin's DNA entry and exit gates are distinct.

Evidence for two protein coding transcripts at the Igf2as locus

The insulin-like growth factor 2 antisense (Igf2as) gene is part of the Ins-Igf2-H19 imprinted gene cluster. The function of the paternally expressed Igf2as is still elusive. In our previous work, we showed that Igf2as transcripts were located in the cytoplasm of C2C12 mouse myoblast cells, associated with polysomes and polyadenylated suggesting that Igf2as is protein coding. In the present work, the protein coding capacity of Igf2as was investigated. We demonstrate for the first time the existence of a polypeptide translated from an Igf2as construct. Furthermore, an RNA-Seq analysis was performed using RNA prepared from skeletal muscles of newborn wild-type and ∆ DMR1-U2 mice to further elucidate the function of Igf2as transcripts. We found no evidence for a regulatory role of Igf2as in the imprinted gene cluster. Interestingly, the RNA-Seq analysis indicated that Igf2as plays a role in the energy metabolism, the cell cycle, histone acetylation and muscle contraction pathways. Our Igf2as investigations further elucidated that there are two distinct Igf2as transcripts corresponding to two putative ORFs.

Challenging the dogma: the hidden layer of non-protein-coding RNAs in complex organisms

The central dogma of biology holds that genetic information normally flows from DNA to RNA to protein. As a consequence it has been generally assumed that genes generally code for proteins, and that proteins fulfil not only most structural and catalytic but also most regulatory functions, in all cells, from microbes to mammals. However, the latter may not be the case in complex organisms. A number of startling observations about the extent of non-protein-coding RNA (ncRNA) transcription in the higher eukaryotes and the range of genetic and epigenetic phenomena that are RNA-directed suggests that the traditional view of the structure of genetic regulatory systems in animals and plants may be incorrect. ncRNA dominates the genomic output of the higher organisms and has been shown to control chromosome architecture, mRNA turnover and the developmental timing of protein expression, and may also regulate transcription and alternative splicing. This paper re-examines the available evidence and suggests a new framework for considering and understanding the genomic programming of biological complexity, autopoletic development and phenotypic variation. BioEssays 25:930-939,2003. (C) 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Elucidating the cis-regulatory landscape of retinal development and regeneration

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2016-04