1000 resultados para Forensic audit


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Audit report on the Iowa Agricultural Development Authority for the year ended June 30, 2009

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Audit report on Sheldon Community School District in Sheldon, Iowa for the year ended June 30, 2009

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Audit report on Adair County, Iowa for the year ended June 30, 2009

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Audit report on the City of Grimes, Iowa for the year ended June 30, 2009

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Audit report on the City of Elkport, Iowa for the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2007

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Audit report on the Iowa Corn Promotion Board for the years ended August 31, 2009 and 2008

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Audit report on Muscatine County, Iowa for the year ended June 30, 2009

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Audit report on the North Iowa Juvenile Detention Services Commission for the year ended June 30, 2009

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Audit report on the Page County Landfill Association for the year ended June 30, 2009

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Audit report on the Butler County Solid Waste Commission for the year ended June 30, 2009

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Audit report on the Office of Governor for the year ended June 30, 2008

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Audit report on the Honey Creek Resort operated by Central Group Management, LLC for the period from inception (September 18, 2008) to June 30, 2009

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Audit report on the City of Shenandoah, Iowa for the year ended June 30, 2009

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

This communication seeks to draw the attention of researchers and practitioners dealing with forensic DNA profiling analyses to the following question: is a scientist's report, offering support to a hypothesis according to which a particular individual is the source of DNA detected during the analysis of a stain, relevant from the point of view of a Court of Justice? This question relates to skeptical views previously voiced by commentators mainly in the judicial area, but is avoided by a large majority of forensic scientists. Notwithstanding, the pivotal role of this question has recently been evoked during the international conference "The hidden side of DNA profiles. Artifacts, errors and uncertain evidence" held in Rome (April 27th to 28th, 2012). Indeed, despite the fact that this conference brought together some of the world's leading forensic DNA specialists, it appeared clearly that a huge gap still exists between questions lawyers are actually interested in, and the answers that scientists deliver to Courts in written reports or during oral testimony. Participants in the justice system, namely lawyers and jurors on the one hand and forensic geneticists on the other, unfortunately talk considerably different languages. It thus is fundamental to address this issue of communication about results of forensic DNA analyses, and open a dialogue with practicing non-scientists at large who need to make meaningful use of scientific results to approach and help solve judicial cases. This paper intends to emphasize the actuality of this topic and suggest beneficial ways ahead towards a more reasoned use of forensic DNA in criminal proceedings.