824 resultados para Touch
Resumo:
1898 is a crucial moment in Spain’s cultural history: Losing its last Colonies Cuba and the Philippines to the USA caused an unprecedented crisis in Spanish self-understanding that set a complex process of spiritual reconstruction rolling. To rebuild Spanish cultural identity as isolated state nation without losing touch with those parts of the Colonial past that were felt as belonging to its broader cultural environment required sophisticated reflection. Cultural issues had to take over the function to bridge between national borders. Music got is own part in this recycling of the Colonial into the Hispanic.
Resumo:
Boberach: Die politischen Ereignisse sind Anlaß, einen bereits im Oktober 1847 veröffentlichten, vom Deutschkatholizismus beeinflußten Aufruf für eine einfache Lebensweise nochmals herauszugeben
Resumo:
This talk will outline the history of the doctor-patient relationship in the West. It will touch briefly on medicine in Greek and Roman antiquity, using key texts from Hippocrates and Galen. It will also sketch the changing balance of the religious and the secular in medieval medicine. Finally, it will outline the rise of the modern personal doctor-patient relationship in the 18th century and analyze the chronic dissatisfaction that settled over relations between doctors and patients in the last quarter of the 20th century.
Resumo:
Built on a free, bilingual, "high-touch, high-tech" platform, New Futuro has created a robust community of Latino students and parents, non-profit organizations, education institutions, government agencies, and corporations to connect those that need help with those that provide it. One of the resources developed by New Futuro is a proprietary 10-Steps College Plan that provides structured information targeted to Latino students and families to help them prepare, apply and pay for college.
Resumo:
La novela de Marcelo Cohen, El oído absoluto, constituye dentro del sistema de la narrativa argentina, un ejemplo interesante y original por su relación con el género utópico. En efecto, el mundo posible creado por el texto para enmarcar la peripecia de los protagonistas: Evelino Borusso, Clarisa Wald, el padre de ésta, cuyo nombre original -León- ha devenido en Lotario, Tristán (nombres en los cuales es dable percibir un dejo de ironía que es la característica de toda la narración) se dan muchas de las características (insularidad, dirigismo, colectivismo, gobierno patriarcal regido por un grupo de filósofos o notables) y de las virtudes ensalzadas en la utopía clásica (el espíritu comunitario, la valoración del trabajo en detrimento del ocio, el desdén por el dinero). Pero al mismo tiempo se socavan, desde las dudas del narrador y de los personajes, las raíces mismas de ese mundo perfecto, y se reclama por una nueva utopía -a música, el lenguaje, la creación novelesca...- que cale más hondo en la intimidad, para clausurar, de una vez para siempre, la soledad y la incomunicación erigidos en puntos centrales de la meditación que la novela propone.
Resumo:
La conocida tesis de Tomás de Aquino de que el ver «es el más elevado de todos [los sentidos]» (De anima, c13) está detrás de la metáfora de la vista como expresión del conocer y de la afirmación de que este sentido es el más inmaterial (y más próximo a lo espiritual) de todos los sentidos externos. Esta noción de ‘ver’ (y de ‘sentir’) presentaba dos elementos constitutivos de todo sentido: lo que tenía como inmutación o impresión (contacto con la realidad) y su carácter formal (aprehensor de la forma sensible). Lograr una posición unitaria que integre tanto el elemento impresivo (dador de realidad) como aprehensivo o cognoscitivo ha sido también el intento de posturas filosóficas contemporáneas (como la de Zubiri) respondiendo a posiciones insuficientes que o bien han primado el elemento de inmediatez, o han señalado el sentir como mero dador de contenido a la inteligencia. Así, este autor revisa las formas de interpretar el sentido, señalando la primariedad del sentido del tacto y la fundamentalidad de éste para la comprensión del verdadero estatuto del sentir humano, poniendo de nuevo en actualidad la reflexión del Aquinate sobre el sentir, indicando a su vez la diferencia de planteamientos de ambos autores.
Resumo:
Durante el primer cuatrimestre del año 2012 la asignatura Patrimonio Natural Regional de la carrera Tecnicatura de Empresas de Servicios Turísticos — Facultad de Turismo — Universidad Nacional del Comahue; contó con la presencia de un estudiante en situación de discapacidad (motora). A partir de la iniciativa de los docentes de la asignatura, se solicita apoyo institucional y se toma contacto con la Comisión Universitaria sobre Accesibilidad al Medio Físico y Social, para consensuar estrategias a implementar en la evaluación parcial del alumno en situación de discapacidad en relación al resto del curso. Este trabajo tiene por objetivos: reflexionar acerca de la evaluación parcial con estudiantes en situación de discapacidad y proponer cambios en la evaluación parcial de la asignatura Patrimonio Natural Regional en relación a estudiantes en situación de discapacidad motora. La metodología usada por el equipo de cátedra fue de un estudio de diseño para las asignaturas del área de concurso Recursos Naturales, contextualizado para el estudiante en situación de discapacidad con el asesoramiento de la comisión sobre accesibilidad y también de la comunicación con el alumno. Algunas conclusiones a las que se arribó tienen relación con los ejes 1. Necesidad de evaluaciones con nuevas estrategias pedagógicas contextuales particulares; 2.Necesidad de un acompañamiento institucional ante la presencia de estudiantes en situación de discapacidad en las aulas.
Resumo:
El objetivo es mostrar las ventajas de trabajar en forma interdisciplinaria haciendo intervención odontológica temprana en bebés discapacitados, utilizando una sala Multisensorial. El alto índice de enfermedades bucodentales que se observa en la población infantil con discapacidad obliga a intervenir en forma preventiva, en edades cada vez más tempranas. Considerando lo intrusivo e invasivo del tratamiento odontológico y lo complejo que es establecer un vínculo con el paciente discapacitado, es que se buscan formas alternativas de lograr crear el vínculo odontólogo-paciente. Los aromas, sonidos, colores, tacto son puertas que todos tenemos abiertas y por las que recibimos lo que sabemos del mundo. La sala multisensorial permite que quienes tienen cerradas esas puertas, encuentren un resquicio por el que les entre una fracción del mundo y eso hace que se encuentren a ellos mismos con su cuerpo y con su terapeuta. Allí es donde interviene el odontólogo que se dedica a la atención de per- sonas especiales, aquél que le muestra al niño discapacitado el mundo de la odontología, que no va a ser la convencional, sino adaptada para ese niño y su discapacidad.
Resumo:
How do sportspeople succeed in a non-collaborative game? An illustration of a perverse side effect of altruism Are team sports specialists predisposed to collaboration? The scientific literature on this topic is divided. The present article attempts to end this debate by applying experimental game theory. We constituted three groups of volunteers (all students aged around 20): 25 team sports specialists; 23 individual sports specialists (gymnasts, track & field athletes and swimmers) and a control group of 24 non-sportspeople. Each subgroup was divided into 3 teams that played against each other in turn (and not against teams from other subgroups). The teams played a game based on the well-known Prisoner's Dilemma (Tucker, 1950) - the paradoxical "Bluegill Sunbass Game" (Binmore, 1999) with three Nash equilibria (two suboptimal equilibria with a pure strategy and an optimal equilibrium with a mixed, egotistical strategy (p= 1/2)). This game also features a Harsanyi equilibrium (based on constant compliance with a moral code and altruism by empathy: "do not unto others that which you would not have them do unto you"). How, then, was the game played? Two teams of 8 competed on a handball court. Each team wore a distinctive jersey. The game lasted 15 minutes and the players were allowed to touch the handball ball with their feet or hands. After each goal, each team had to return to its own half of the court. Players were allowed to score in either goal and thus cooperate with their teammates or not, as they saw fit. A goal against the nominally opposing team (a "guardian" strategy, by analogy with the Bluegill Sunbass Game) earned a point for everyone in the team. For an own goal (a "sneaker" strategy), only the scorer earned a point - hence the paradox. If all the members of a team work together to score a goal, everyone is happy (the Harsanyi solution). However, the situation was not balanced in the Nashian sense: each player had a reason to be disloyal to his/her team at the merest opportunity. But if everyone adopts a "sneaker" strategy, the game becomes a free-for-all and the chances of scoring become much slimmer. In a context in which doubt reigns as to the honesty of team members and "legal betrayals", what type of sportsperson will score the most goals? By analogy with the Bluegill Sunbass Game, we recorded direct motor interactions (passes and shots) based on either a "guardian" tactic (i.e. collaboration within the team) or a "sneaker" tactic (shots and passes against the player's designated team). So, was the group of team sports specialist more collaborative than the other two groups? The answer was no. A statistical analysis (difference from chance in a logistic regression) enabled us to draw three conclusions: ?For the team sports specialists, the Nash equilibrium (1950) was stronger than the Harsanyi equilibrium (1977). ?The sporting principles of equilibrium and exclusivity are not appropriate in the Bluegill Sunbass Game and are quickly abandoned by the team sports specialists. The latter are opportunists who focus solely on winning and do well out of it. ?The most altruistic players are the main losers in the Bluegill Sunbass Game: they keep the game alive but contribute to their own defeat. In our experiment, the most altruistic players tended to be the females and the individual sports specialists
Resumo:
En este artículo, nos proponemos analizar la construcción y el funcionamiento de una red de poder ego-centrada, la de Juan Manuel de Rosas, durante el período de su primer (1829-1832) y segundo gobierno (1835-1852), a través de la correspondencia que mantuvo con los jueces de paz de la campaña bonaerense a través de sus edecanes. Esto nos pone, fundamentalmente, en contacto con el tema de la comunicación, la circulación de la información y la construcción de un espacio de relación política.
Resumo:
En este artículo, nos proponemos analizar la construcción y el funcionamiento de una red de poder ego-centrada, la de Juan Manuel de Rosas, durante el período de su primer (1829-1832) y segundo gobierno (1835-1852), a través de la correspondencia que mantuvo con los jueces de paz de la campaña bonaerense a través de sus edecanes. Esto nos pone, fundamentalmente, en contacto con el tema de la comunicación, la circulación de la información y la construcción de un espacio de relación política.
Resumo:
How do sportspeople succeed in a non-collaborative game? An illustration of a perverse side effect of altruism Are team sports specialists predisposed to collaboration? The scientific literature on this topic is divided. The present article attempts to end this debate by applying experimental game theory. We constituted three groups of volunteers (all students aged around 20): 25 team sports specialists; 23 individual sports specialists (gymnasts, track & field athletes and swimmers) and a control group of 24 non-sportspeople. Each subgroup was divided into 3 teams that played against each other in turn (and not against teams from other subgroups). The teams played a game based on the well-known Prisoner's Dilemma (Tucker, 1950) - the paradoxical "Bluegill Sunbass Game" (Binmore, 1999) with three Nash equilibria (two suboptimal equilibria with a pure strategy and an optimal equilibrium with a mixed, egotistical strategy (p= 1/2)). This game also features a Harsanyi equilibrium (based on constant compliance with a moral code and altruism by empathy: "do not unto others that which you would not have them do unto you"). How, then, was the game played? Two teams of 8 competed on a handball court. Each team wore a distinctive jersey. The game lasted 15 minutes and the players were allowed to touch the handball ball with their feet or hands. After each goal, each team had to return to its own half of the court. Players were allowed to score in either goal and thus cooperate with their teammates or not, as they saw fit. A goal against the nominally opposing team (a "guardian" strategy, by analogy with the Bluegill Sunbass Game) earned a point for everyone in the team. For an own goal (a "sneaker" strategy), only the scorer earned a point - hence the paradox. If all the members of a team work together to score a goal, everyone is happy (the Harsanyi solution). However, the situation was not balanced in the Nashian sense: each player had a reason to be disloyal to his/her team at the merest opportunity. But if everyone adopts a "sneaker" strategy, the game becomes a free-for-all and the chances of scoring become much slimmer. In a context in which doubt reigns as to the honesty of team members and "legal betrayals", what type of sportsperson will score the most goals? By analogy with the Bluegill Sunbass Game, we recorded direct motor interactions (passes and shots) based on either a "guardian" tactic (i.e. collaboration within the team) or a "sneaker" tactic (shots and passes against the player's designated team). So, was the group of team sports specialist more collaborative than the other two groups? The answer was no. A statistical analysis (difference from chance in a logistic regression) enabled us to draw three conclusions: ?For the team sports specialists, the Nash equilibrium (1950) was stronger than the Harsanyi equilibrium (1977). ?The sporting principles of equilibrium and exclusivity are not appropriate in the Bluegill Sunbass Game and are quickly abandoned by the team sports specialists. The latter are opportunists who focus solely on winning and do well out of it. ?The most altruistic players are the main losers in the Bluegill Sunbass Game: they keep the game alive but contribute to their own defeat. In our experiment, the most altruistic players tended to be the females and the individual sports specialists
Resumo:
En este artículo, nos proponemos analizar la construcción y el funcionamiento de una red de poder ego-centrada, la de Juan Manuel de Rosas, durante el período de su primer (1829-1832) y segundo gobierno (1835-1852), a través de la correspondencia que mantuvo con los jueces de paz de la campaña bonaerense a través de sus edecanes. Esto nos pone, fundamentalmente, en contacto con el tema de la comunicación, la circulación de la información y la construcción de un espacio de relación política.
Resumo:
How do sportspeople succeed in a non-collaborative game? An illustration of a perverse side effect of altruism Are team sports specialists predisposed to collaboration? The scientific literature on this topic is divided. The present article attempts to end this debate by applying experimental game theory. We constituted three groups of volunteers (all students aged around 20): 25 team sports specialists; 23 individual sports specialists (gymnasts, track & field athletes and swimmers) and a control group of 24 non-sportspeople. Each subgroup was divided into 3 teams that played against each other in turn (and not against teams from other subgroups). The teams played a game based on the well-known Prisoner's Dilemma (Tucker, 1950) - the paradoxical "Bluegill Sunbass Game" (Binmore, 1999) with three Nash equilibria (two suboptimal equilibria with a pure strategy and an optimal equilibrium with a mixed, egotistical strategy (p= 1/2)). This game also features a Harsanyi equilibrium (based on constant compliance with a moral code and altruism by empathy: "do not unto others that which you would not have them do unto you"). How, then, was the game played? Two teams of 8 competed on a handball court. Each team wore a distinctive jersey. The game lasted 15 minutes and the players were allowed to touch the handball ball with their feet or hands. After each goal, each team had to return to its own half of the court. Players were allowed to score in either goal and thus cooperate with their teammates or not, as they saw fit. A goal against the nominally opposing team (a "guardian" strategy, by analogy with the Bluegill Sunbass Game) earned a point for everyone in the team. For an own goal (a "sneaker" strategy), only the scorer earned a point - hence the paradox. If all the members of a team work together to score a goal, everyone is happy (the Harsanyi solution). However, the situation was not balanced in the Nashian sense: each player had a reason to be disloyal to his/her team at the merest opportunity. But if everyone adopts a "sneaker" strategy, the game becomes a free-for-all and the chances of scoring become much slimmer. In a context in which doubt reigns as to the honesty of team members and "legal betrayals", what type of sportsperson will score the most goals? By analogy with the Bluegill Sunbass Game, we recorded direct motor interactions (passes and shots) based on either a "guardian" tactic (i.e. collaboration within the team) or a "sneaker" tactic (shots and passes against the player's designated team). So, was the group of team sports specialist more collaborative than the other two groups? The answer was no. A statistical analysis (difference from chance in a logistic regression) enabled us to draw three conclusions: ?For the team sports specialists, the Nash equilibrium (1950) was stronger than the Harsanyi equilibrium (1977). ?The sporting principles of equilibrium and exclusivity are not appropriate in the Bluegill Sunbass Game and are quickly abandoned by the team sports specialists. The latter are opportunists who focus solely on winning and do well out of it. ?The most altruistic players are the main losers in the Bluegill Sunbass Game: they keep the game alive but contribute to their own defeat. In our experiment, the most altruistic players tended to be the females and the individual sports specialists