John Warren's copy of votes from a meeting of the Boston Medical Society, 1784 May 3

This document lists the eleven votes cast at a meeting of the Boston Medical Society on May 3, 1784. It was authorized as a "true coppy" by Thomas Kast, the Secretary of the Society. The following members of the Society were present at the meeting, all of them doctors: James Pecker, James Lloyd, Joseph Gardner, Samuel Danforth, Isaac Rand, Jr., Charles Jarvis, Thomas Kast, Benjamin Curtis, Thomas Welsh, Nathaniel Walker Appleton, and doctors whose last names were Adams, Townsend, Eustis, Homans, and Whitwell. The document indicates that a meeting had been held the previous evening, as well (May 2, 1784), at which the topics on which votes were taken had been discussed. The votes, eleven in total, were all related to the doctors' concerns about John Warren and his involvement with the emerging medical school (now Harvard Medical School), that school's relation to almshouses, the medical care of the poor, and other related matters. The tone and content of these votes reveals anger on the part of the members of the Boston Medical Society towards Warren. This anger appears to have stemmed from the perceived threat of Warren to their own practices, exacerbated by a vote of the Harvard Corporation on April 19, 1784. This vote authorized Warren to apply to the Overseers of the Poor for the town of Boston, requesting that students in the newly-established Harvard medical program, where Warren was Professor of Anatomy and Surgery, be allowed to visit the hospital of the almshouse with their professors for the purpose of clinical instruction. Although Warren believed that the students would learn far more from these visits, in regards to surgical experience, than they could possibly learn in Cambridge, the proposal provoked great distrust from the members of the Boston Medical Society, who accused Warren of an "attempt to direct the public medical business from its usual channels" for his own financial and professional gain.

Differences between groups of family physicians with different attitudes towards at-risk drinkers : a post hoc study of the ODHIN survey in Portugal

Copyright © 2016 Frederico Rosário et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Testing limited environmental liability against human rights requirements. IES WORKING PAPER 3/2009

Questions regarding oil spills remain high on the political agenda. Legal scholars, legislators as well as the international, European and national Courts struggle to determine key issues, such as who is to be held liable for oil spills, under which conditions and for which damage. The international regime on oil spills was meant to establish an “equilibrium” between the needs of the victims (being compensated for their harm) and the needs of the economic actors (being able to continue their activities). There is, however, a constantly increasing array of legal scholars’ work that criticizes the regime. Indeed, the victims of a recent oil spill, the Erika, have tried to escape the international regime on oil spills and to rely instead on the provisions of national criminal law or EC waste legislation. In parallel, the EC legislator has questioned the sufficiency of the international regime, as it has started preparing legislative acts of its own. One can in fact wonder whether challenging the international liability regime with the European Convention on Human Rights could prove to be a way forward, both for the EC regulators as well as the victims of oil spills. This paper claims that the right to property, as enshrined in Article P1-1 of the Human Rights Convention, could be used to challenge the limited environmental liability provisions of the international frameworks.

Impact report on the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act : a comparison of 40 major consumer product warranties from before and after the act /

Mode of access: Internet.

The insurance industry. Hearings before the Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monopoly of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Eighty-fifth Congress, second session, pursuant to S. Res. 231 ...

Continuous paging.

Doctors to the great,

Mode of access: Internet.

Report of Atlantic City conference on workmen's compensation acts ... July, 1909.

Mode of access: Internet.

The Virginia Workmen's Compensation Act. With annotations, court decisions construing the act and formal rules of the Industrial Commission. /

Running title: Workmen's compensation law of Virginia

The Virginia workmen's compensation act. With annotations, court decisions construing the act and formal rules of the Industrial commission. /

Mode of access: Internet.

Agent Orange legislation and oversight [microform] : hearing before the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundredth Congress, second session, on S. 1692, the proposed "Agent Orange Disability Benefits Act of 1987"; S. 1787, the proposed "Veterans' Agent Orange Disabilities Act of 1987"; and Agent Orange oversight issues, May 12, 1988.

CIS Microfiche Accession Numbers: CIS 89 S761-8

Report of the Workmen's Compensation Board for the year.

At head of title, <1922>-1973: The Workmen's Compensation Act, Manitoba.

International aviation : implications of ratifying Montreal aviation protocol no. 3 /

"B-241737"--P. 1.

Reorganization plan no. 19 of 1950 : transfer of employees' compensation functions from Federal Security Agency to Department of Labor : report.

Also in Congressional serial volume 11368.

Canadian workmen's compensation acts and cases : containing comparative tables and references to the acts of British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba and Saskatchewan, together with a digest of cases decided thereunder and comparative references to the English act of 1906 /

Mode of access: Internet.