Clean Air Act Amendments of 1989 : hearing before the Subcommittee on Environmental Protection of the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, One Hundred First Congress, first session ...

Item 1045-A, 1045-B (MF)

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Amendments of 1991 : hearings before the Subcommittee on Environmental Protection of the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, One Hundred Second Congress, first session, on S. 976 ... June 5, 6, 18; July 24 and 25, 1991.

Shipping list no.: 91-756-P (pt. 1).

Final environmental impact statement : wastewater treatment facilities, South Shore Lake Tahoe Basin /

"May 1981."

Environmental management.

Mode of access: Internet.

Cross-cutting environmental laws : a guide for federal/state project officers.

Mode of access: Internet.

Intergovernmental decisionmaking for environmental protection and public works /

Mode of access: Internet.

Clean Air Act amendments of 1987 : hearings before the Subcommittee on Environmental Protection of the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, One hundredth Congress, first session, on S. 300, S. 321, S. 1351, and S. 1384.

"June 19; July 22 and 23, 1987"--Pt. 2.

Environmental research and development : hearing before the Subcommittee on Toxic Substances and Environmental Oversight of the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, Ninety-eighth Congress, first session, June 14, 1983.

Pt. 1 not named as such.

Environmental implications of trends in agriculture and silviculture /

Mode of access: Internet.

Environmental protection : wider use of advanced technologies can improve emissions monitoring : report to Congressional requesters /

"GAO-01-313."

U.S. government environmental datafiles & software : microcomputers & mainframes.

"3/94"--P [4] of cover.

Science-policy in environmental and health risk assessment: if we cannot do without, can we do better?

How can empirical evidence of adverse effects from exposure to noxious agents, which is often incomplete and uncertain, be used most appropriately to protect human health? We examine several important questions on the best uses of empirical evidence in regulatory risk management decision-making raised by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s science-policy concerning uncertainty and variability in human health risk assessment. In our view, the US EPA (and other agencies that have adopted similar views of risk management) can often improve decision-making by decreasing reliance on default values and assumptions, particularly when causation is uncertain. This can be achieved by more fully exploiting decision-theoretic methods and criteria that explicitly account for uncertain, possibly conflicting scientific beliefs and that can be fully studied by advocates and adversaries of a policy choice, in administrative decision-making involving risk assessment. The substitution of decision-theoretic frameworks for default assumption-driven policies also allows stakeholder attitudes toward risk to be incorporated into policy debates, so that the public and risk managers can more explicitly identify the roles of risk-aversion or other attitudes toward risk and uncertainty in policy recommendations. Decision theory provides a sound scientific way explicitly to account for new knowledge and its effects on eventual policy choices. Although these improvements can complicate regulatory analyses, simplifying default assumptions can create substantial costs to society and can prematurely cut off consideration of new scientific insights (e.g., possible beneficial health effects from exposure to sufficiently low 'hormetic' doses of some agents). In many cases, the administrative burden of applying decision-analytic methods is likely to be more than offset by improved effectiveness of regulations in achieving desired goals. Because many foreign jurisdictions adopt US EPA reasoning and methods of risk analysis, it may be especially valuable to incorporate decision-theoretic principles that transcend local differences among jurisdictions.

Happiness, environmental protection and market economy

The manufacturing sector is leaving the West for Asia���s low wages and good working culture. Europe would be better off keeping these manufacturing activities, slowing down wage inflation and what is more, letting a young, cheaper workforce from the East settle down within their borders. This would aid in preserving the diverse economic structure which has been characteristic for Europe.Beside the economic growth there are two more concepts which have turned into the ���holy cows��� of economics during the last fifty years. One is the need to constantly improve labor productivity and the other is increasing competitiveness of nations. The high labor productivity of some countries, induces severe unemployment in the globalized world. In the other hand it is high time we understood that it is not competition, but cooperation that brings more happiness to humanity.Should we still opt for ���happiness��� and ���sanity���, it is quite obvious that we all should, in economists��� terms, define our individual welfare functions corresponding to our own set of values, staying free from the influence of media, advertisements and fashion. The cornerstone to all this is the intelligent citizen who prefers local goods and services.