Doing Intersectionality: Repertoires of Feminist Practices in France and Canada

Intersectionality has been adopted as the preferred term to refer to and to analyze multiple axes of oppression in feminist theory. However, less research examines if this term, and the political analyses it carries, has been adopted by women's rights organizations in various contexts and to what effect. Drawing on interviews with activists working in a variety of women's rights organizations in France and Canada, I show that intersectionality is only one of the repertoires that a women's rights organization might use to analyze the social experience and the political interests of women situated at the intersection of several axes of domination. I propose a typology of four repertoires that activists use to reflect on intersectionality and inclusiveness. Drawing on a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the interview data, I show that hegemonic repertoires about racial or religious identity in one national context shape the way activists and organizations understand intersectionality and its challenges. The identity of organizations, as well as their main function (advocacy or providing service), also shape their understanding of intersectional issues.

Recueil de commentaires exégétiques

F. 1-15v : Rabbi Meïr Halevi Abulafia, commentaire du livre d'Esther. F. 16r-39v : Isaac ben Shem Tov ibn Shem Tov (14..-15..), commentaire du livre des Proverbes. F. 40r-108v : Joseph ben Abraham Hayoun, commentaire sur le Cantique des cantiques. F. 110r-250v : Salomon ben Moïse Alkabetz , שרש ישי. F. 251r-263v : commentaire des Prophètes et des Hagiographes. F. 264 : florilèges. F. 265r-284v : Jedaiah ben Abraham Bedersi, בחינת עולם