965 resultados para Altro Health and Rehabilitation Services (New York, N.Y.)
Resumo:
"July 13, 2004; CERCLIS Number NYSFN0204234."
Resumo:
"November 29, 2005; CERCLIS No. NYD002041531."
Resumo:
"CERCLIS No. NYD067532580."
Public health assessment, Hudson Technologies Inc., village of Hillburn, Rockland County, New York /
Resumo:
"CERCLIS No. NY0001392463."
Resumo:
Cover title.
Resumo:
pt. 1. How much legal protection does New York State give the consumer?--pt. 2. Consumer Laws & Action.
Resumo:
"November 30, 2005; CERCLIS No. NYD047650197."
Resumo:
Description based on: 1910/11.
Resumo:
Shipping list no.: 93-0567-P.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Bibliographical footnotes.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2016-06
Resumo:
Objective: Existing evidence suggests that vocational rehabilitation services, in particular individual placement and support (IPS), are effective in assisting people with schizophrenia and related conditions gain open employment. Despite this, such services are not available to all unemployed people with schizophrenia who wish to work. Existing evidence suggests that while IPS confers no clinical advantages over routine care, it does improve the proportion of people returning to employment. The objective of the current study is to investigate the net benefit of introducing IPS services into current mental health services in Australia. Method: The net benefit of IPS is assessed from a health sector perspective using cost-benefit analysis. A two-stage approach is taken to the assessment of benefit. The first stage involves a quantitative analysis of the net benefit, defined as the benefits of IPS (comprising transfer payments averted, income tax accrued and individual income earned) minus the costs. The second stage involves application of 'second-filter' criteria (including equity, strength of evidence, feasibility and acceptability to stakeholders) to results. The robustness of results is tested using the multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results: The costs of IPS are $A10.3M (95% uncertainty interval $A7.4M-$A13.6M), the benefits are $A4.7M ($A3.1M-$A6.5M), resulting in a negative net benefit of $A5.6M ($A8.4M-$A3.4M). Conclusions: The current analysis suggests that IPS costs are greater than the monetary benefits. However, the evidence-base of the current analysis is weak. Structural conditions surrounding welfare payments in Australia create disincentives to full-time employment for people with disabilities.