869 resultados para 180110 Criminal Law and Procedure
Resumo:
Artykuł dotyczy znaczenia klauzuli „wypadku mniejszej wagi” w polskim prawie karnym. Obecna regulacja tej instytucji budzi wiele wątpliwości, które mają niebagatelne znaczenie dla praktyki prawa karnego. Część przedstawicieli doktryny traktuje ją jak dyrektywę wymiaru kary, a część jak odrębny sposób tworzenia typu uprzywilejowanego. Wybranie jednego z powyższych ujęć prowadzi do rozbieżności w procesie stosowania prawa karnego materialnego, a także w procesie wymierzania kary dla sprawcy przestępstwa. W artykule dokonano przeglądu różnych sposobów rozumienia klauzuli „wypadku mniejszej wagi” oraz implikacji wynikających z ich przyjęcia. W podsumowaniu zawarto również postulat większego dookreślenia znaczenia tej klauzuli.
Resumo:
La Teoría del Derecho Penal del Enemigo postula la existencia de un ordenamiento penal que distinga entre personas fieles al ordenamiento jurídico y aquellos que con su conducta demuestran una posición contraria al orden jurídico y tienen como fin la desestabilización del sistema estatal. La presente investigación está destinada al análisis de la Legislación Penal Ecuatoriana y su vinculación con la denominada doctrina penal a través del delito de terrorismo. En un primer momento realizaremos un análisis de la doctrina en mención, sus postulados y finalidades. Posterior a ello, describiremos el Constitucionalismo Garantista y Dignatario y su fuerte contradicción con los postulados del jurista alemán Gunther Jakobs, titular de la teoría del “Derecho Penal del Enemigo”. Finalmente analizaremos el tipo penal Terrorismo en relación con el Derecho Penal del Acto, junto al estudio y crítica del caso denominado “Los 10 de Luluncoto” a la luz de los Derechos Humanos.
Resumo:
Resumo: 1 – Sumário do Acórdão do Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, de 19 de Abril de 2012; 2 – Texto completo do Acórdão do Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, de 19 de Abril de 2012: cfr. http://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/fc664c231f3e73cf802579ea003d91d2?OpenDocument&Highlight=0,polui%C3%A7%C3%A3o , 2 de Junho de 2012; 3 – Anotação sintética; 3.1 – Introdução à anotação sintética e suas características neste caso concreto; 4 – Algumas referências constitucionais centrais em relação a Direitos humanos e, nomeadamente, a um Direito humano a um meio-ambiente sadio, saudável em todas as suas vertentes e sentidos – o exemplo central do artigo 9.º da CRP; 4.1 – Algumas referências constitucionais centrais em relação a Direitos humanos e, nomeadamente, a um Direito humano a um meio-ambiente sadio, saudável em todas as suas vertentes e sentidos – o exemplo central do artigo 66.º da CRP e o Regime Geral do Ruído; 5 – O direito humano ao descanso e à saúde, rectius o direito ao ambiente sadio vs o direito ao lazer e/ou exploração económica de indústrias de diversão, rectius o direito à liberdade de iniciativa económica privada; 6 – A violação do direito humano, de personalidade, ao descanso e à saúde, rectius o direito a um ambiente sadio, numa perspectiva de Direito privado e Direito civil; 7 – A criminalização da poluição, designadamente a criminalização da poluição sonora – uma perspectiva de Direito público e Direito penal; 8 - A necessidade duma adequada política tributária que compatibilize desenvolvimento sustentado com a protecção dum meio ambiente sadio e com qualidade de vida; 9 – Conclusões. Palavras-chave: Direitos Humanos; Direito constitucional; Direito público; Direito penal; Direito privado; Direito civil; Direito ambiental; meio ambiente sadio; Direito ao descanso; Direito à saúde; Direito ao lazer e/ou exploração económica de indústrias de diversão; direito à liberdade de iniciativa económica privada; Direito tributário; Direito fiscal; Direito aduaneiro. Abstract: 1 - Summary of the Judgment of the Supreme Court of April 19, 2012, 2 - Complete text of the Judgment of the Supreme Court of April 19, 2012: cf. http://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814/fc664c231f3e73cf802579ea003d91d2?OpenDocument&Highlight=0,polui%C3%A7%C3%A3o , June 2, 2012, 3 - Synthetic Note: 3.1 - Introduction to synthetic annotation and its characteristics in this case 4 - Some references constitutional power over human rights and in particular to a human right to a healthy environment, healthy in all its forms and meanings - the central example of Article 9. of CRP; 4.1 - Some references constitutional power over human rights and in particular to a human right to a healthy environment, healthy in all its forms and meanings - the central example of Article 66. No of CRP and the General Noise; 5 - the human right to rest and health, rectius the right to healthy environment vs. the right to leisure and / or economic exploitation of industries fun, rectius the right to freedom of private economic initiative; 6 - the violation of human personality, to rest and health, rectius the right to a healthy environment, a perspective of private law and civil law; 7 - criminalization of pollution, including the criminalization of noise - a perspective of public law and criminal law; 8 - the need for appropriate tax policy that reconciles sustainable development with the protection of a healthy environment and quality of life; 9 - Conclusions.
Resumo:
Il presente elaborato si propone di esaminare il tema del fine vita, con specifico riferimento al suicidio assistito e all’eutanasia. Dopo aver evidenziato la netta distinzione tra rifiuto/rinuncia del trattamento sanitario anche salva vita, aiuto al suicidio ed eutanasia, ci si sofferma, in primo luogo, sull’analisi della legge n. 219/2017, rubricata “Norme in materia di consenso informato e di disposizioni anticipate di trattamento”, che riconosce la massima ampiezza all’autodeterminazione terapeutica nell’ambito della relazione medico-paziente. In secondo luogo, si esamina il tema del suicidio assistito, soffermandosi sulle pronunce della giurisprudenza costituzionale e di merito. Successivamente, in una prospettiva comparata, viene fornita un’ampia analisi delle discipline della morte medicalmente assistita attualmente vigente in diversi ordinamenti. Infine, si esamina il tema dell’eutanasia, in particolare concentrandosi sulla donazione di organi post eutanasia, sul rischio della slippery slope e sulla necessità di tutelare i soggetti vulnerabili.
Resumo:
"The general rules of practice and procedure are treated in volumes I and II, while volume III is devoted wholly to procedure and evidence in various common law crimes."--Pref, to 2d ed.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
"Some remarks on the writ of habeas corpus: and a review of the proceedings under the same. 2nd ed. 1846": p.[187]-222.
Resumo:
Editors: v. 1-3, J. G. Hawley.--v. 4-10, J. Gibbons.--v. 11-15, J. F. Geeting and H. C. Geeting
Resumo:
Excerpt: Jewish Theological Seminary of America, Students' annual. v. 1, 1914.
Resumo:
This paper uses three films adapted from the novels of John Grisham, The Firm, The Rainmaker and A Time To Kill, as well as associated television series like Ed to map a vernacular theory of what I have termed the 'postmaterial' lawyer. Grisham's work has been the focus of much critique by legal scholars who suggests he hates lawyers, is critical of the concept of law, and provides 'outlandishly' happy endings. I will challenge these critiques and, in tracing the history of legal thrillers and trial movies, suggest that Grisham and the related texts' explorations of how a just practitioner can operate in an unjust system constitute a powerful interrogation of what law can be.
Resumo:
The Spanish judicial system is independent and headed by the Supreme Court. Spain has a civil law system. The criminal procedure is governed by the legality principle--by opposition to the opportunity or expediency principle--which implies that prosecution must take place in all cases in which sufficient evidence exists of guilt. Traditionally, the role of the PPS in Spain has been very limited during the investigative stage of the process. That stage is under the responsibility of the Examining Magistrate (EM). Since the end of the 1980s, a series of modifications has been introduced in order to extend the functions of the PPS. In 1988, the PPS received extended competences which allow them to receive reports of offenses. Upon knowing of an offense (reported or known to have been committed), the PPS can initiate the criminal proceeding. The PPS is also allowed to lead a sort of plea bargain under a series of restrictive conditions and only for some offenses. At the same time, the PPS received extended competences in the juvenile justice criminal proceeding in 2000. With all this said, the role of the PPS has not changed radically and, during the investigative stage of the process, their main role remains the presentation of the accusation, playing a more active role during the trial stage of the proceeding. In this article the national criminal justice system of Spain is described. Special attention is paid to the function of the PPS within this framework and its relationship to police and courts. The article refers to legal provisions and the factual handling of criminal cases.
Resumo:
This dissertation examines parental disciplinary violence against children in authority records and in the criminal procedure in Finland. The main aim is to analyze disciplinary violence, how it is defined, and how it is constructed as a crime by social workers, the police, and parents. This dissertation consists of four sub-studies and a summary article. In the first sub-study, I examine how disciplinary violence appears in child welfare documents and analyze the decision-making processes and measures taken by the child welfare workers. The second sub-study, utilizing police interview data, examines police officers’ perceptions of disciplinary violence, its criminalization, and its investigation. In addition to this analysis of police officers’ own perceptions, in the third sub-study, I use reports of crime and pre-trial investigation documents to look at what a typical suspicion of disciplinary violence coming to the attention of the police is and examine the decision-making processes of the police. Utilizing authority data, the fourth sub-study analyzes how parents rationalize the use of disciplinary violence to the authorities investigating these suspicions. The research provides findings that are unprecedented in Finland. Firstly, it was shown that social workers’ decision-making processes in suspicions of disciplinary violence follow three pathways of reasoning, with many factors taken into consideration; and in less than one-third of the cases, a request for criminal investigation has been made to the police. Secondly, it was verified that police officers hold different perceptions of disciplinary violence, and these perceptions have multiple effects on the investigation of these cases and the construction of disciplinary violence as a crime. Thirdly, the analysis of the reports of crime and pre-trial investigation documents showed that almost two-thirds of the cases of disciplinary violence had been sent to a prosecutor by the police and, thus, defined as a crime. However, in many cases, acts of disciplinary violence were often seen as ‘educational, petty one-off incidents’ and a possible trial and punishment for the perpetrator were seen as unreasonable. Fourthly, it was found that parents often try to neutralize and rationalize the violence they have used against their children, for example, either by denying the victim, the criminal intent, or the entire act, or relying on the necessity of the forbidden act. The dissertation concludes that disciplinary violence is defined and constructed in authority policies and practices, first and foremost, by the severity of the act, the nature of the act as continuous or singular, the perceived harm caused by the act to a child, and the perceptions of authorities regarding physical punishment of children. The asymmetrical power setting present in disciplinary violence and parents’ legitimized right to raise and discipline their children partly seem to explain why criminal-law processing of these suspicions of violence and understanding these as crimes is difficult. Finally, this research calls for more coherent and consistent authority practices and policies, achieved by educating authorities and increasing awareness on disciplinary violence, questions the need for a concept like ‘disciplinary’ violence, and suggests more emphasis on unambiguous perceptions of a child’s best interest.