Comorbidity and nutritional indices as predictors of morbidity after transurethral procedures: A prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative scores are widely used predictors of complications after major surgery. These scores, however, are not widely used in transurethral procedures. The aim of this study was to assess the value of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), the age-adjusted CCI, the American Society of Anesthesiologist score (ASA) and the Nutritional Risk Score (NRS) in predicting early morbidity after transurethral urological procedures. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing transurethral resection of the bladder or the prostate were prospectively enrolled. The scores were calculated preoperatively; 30-day complications were prospectively recorded according to the Dindo-Clavien classification. Univariate logistic regression was performed to investigate the value of each score and of other factors (i.e., age, sex, body mass index, anemia, smoking habit, type of operation and anaesthesia) as predictors of complications. A multivariate model was then calculated using these predictors. RESULTS: Overall, 197 patients were included. The mean age was 72 (standard deviation ± 10). In total, 26.9% patients had at least 1 complication. Using univariate analysis, we found that each score significantly predicted complications. In multivariate analysis, only the ASA (odds ration [OR] 2.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-4.43) and the NRS (OR 2.42; 95% CI 1.56-3.74) remained independent predictors. The best model incorporated ASA, NRS and gender, and predicted morbidity with an area under the curve of 76%. Our study's main limitations are population heterogeneity and limited sample size. CONCLUSION: The ASA and the NRS are important and independent determinants of early morbidity after transurethral procedures. The use of these indices may assist clinicians in the decision-making process to balance the possible benefits of transurethral procedures with the potential risks.

The importance of sonographer experience and machine quality with regards to the role of musculoskeletal ultrasound in routine care of rheumatoid arthritis patients.

OBJECTIVES: Regarding recent progress, musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) will probably soon be integrated in standard care of patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, in daily care, quality of US machines and level of experience of sonographers are varied. We conducted a study to assess reproducibility and feasibility of an US scoring for RA, including US devices of different quality and rheumatologist with various levels of expertise in US as it would be in daily care. METHODS: The Swiss Sonography in Arthritis and Rheumatism (SONAR) group has developed a semi-quantitative score using OMERACT criteria for synovitis and erosion in RA. The score was taught to 108 rheumatologists trained in US. One year after the last workshop, 19 rheumatologists participated in the study. Scans were performed on 6 US machines ranging from low to high quality, each with a different patient. Weighted kappa was calculated for each pair of readers. RESULTS: Overall, the agreement was fair to moderate. Quality of device, experience of the sonographers and practice of the score before the study improved substantially the agreement. Agreement assessed on higher quality machine, among sonographers with good experience in US increased to substantial (median kappa for B-mode and Doppler: 0.64 and 0.41 for erosion). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated feasibility and reproducibility of the Swiss US SONAR score for RA. Our results confirmed importance of the quality of US machine and the training of sonographers for the implementation of US scoring in the routine daily care of RA.