The angler's progress : a poem : developing the pleasures the angler receives from the dawn of the propensity in infancy till the period of his becoming a complete angler.

[Last 2 pages contain advertising matter.]

The angler; : a poem, in ten cantos. Comprising proper instructions in the art, with rules to choose fishing rods, lines, hooks, floats, baits, and to make artificial flies; receipts for pastes, &c. &c. Embellished with upwards of twenty beautiful wood-cuts. /

References: Westwood, T. Bibliotheca piscatoria, p. 131.

Davy Jones, or, The Welch psalm singer : a Gilpinic tale /

Hand-colored illustrations.

The ecclesiastical law /

Includes bibliographical references and index.

The history and antiquities of the counties of Westmorland and Cumberland.

For errors in paging see Upcott.

Imperial gazetteer of India ...

Editor for India, 1902-04, William Stevenson Meyer; 1905-09, Richard Burn; editor in England, James Sutherland Cotton.

A descriptive catalogue of the London traders, tavern, and coffee-house tokens current in the seventeenth century;

Mode of access: Internet.

Commentaries on the laws of England.

Book has press figures.

School of Nursing Class of 1980

Top Row: Debbi Anderson, Cherie Armstrong, Diane Arney, Grace Ball, Marie Bazil, Suzanne Bihan, Nancy Black, Ellen Bochenck, Lisa Bramble, Ann Marie Brissette, Mary Brock, Gale Brown, Nancy Buhl, Judith Burek, Dana Leigh Burn, Mari Byce

Row 2: Dianne Byrd, Diane Cary, Julie Rosanne Cherno, Susan Copland, Lisa Corso, Sharon Corzine, Elsa Cowan, Linda Crawley, Constance D Anna, Mary Daly, Julie De May, Janet Dean, Lwah Ann Dennis, Leslie Jean De Noon, Barbara Deur, Marilynn Dowdy

Row 3: Laurie B. Dreisbach, Patricia Dvorak, Mary Earle, Judith Eason, Charlene Eickholt, Kathryn Elden, Susan Bourget, B.M. Rutkowski, J.Sebring-Mammel, Joan Kessler, Gregory Hazle, Rosa Ohno, Miriam Elgent, Micky Erickson, Kathleen Evans, Cathleen Fasse, Martha Finkelstein, Edie Firshman

Row 4: Susan Fitzpatrick, Lynn foley, Barbara Fredal, Lisa Ghormley, Susan Green, Carol Grishaw, Jennifer Hayden, Susan Hewens, Brenda J. Hooker, M. Karen Harning, Jean Huneke, Rose Hunter

Row 5: Joyce Jackson, Janet James, Mary Jesse, Christy Jones, Kathy Joy, Debra kadlec, Therese Keating, Ann Marie Kelly, Carol Key, Karen Dickstein, Jill Knechtel, Robin Kruger

Row 6: Mary Beth Kyko, Catherine Lawrence, Joni Lawrence, Eun Lee, Amy Long, Kathey F. Lord, Johanna Lund, Elizabeth Mac Kinnon, Marilyn Mackovjak, Lisa Mann, rose Marentette, Carmen McDowell

Row 7: Molly Mitchell, Mary Molewyk, Sandra Musci, Susan Nevins, Janet Newman, Marcy L. Ortquist, Jeanmarie Otto, Marci Peterhans, Marquite Pierce, Janet Pierson, Rachel Plumley, Frances Potasnik, Cynthia pressprich, Susan J. Robertson, Gilbert RodriqueZ, Deborah Romano, Deborah Ross, Patricia Rouen

Row 8: Abby Scholnick, Nancy Schuster, Cynthia Schwartz, Mary Ellen Sitek, Marqaret Smith, Ann Marie Smith, Cindy Smith, Julie Smrcka, Susan St. Onge, Michelle Stafford, Brenda Stallings, Nancy Steffler, Louise Sullivan, Laure Szatkowski, Bonnie R. Temple, Patricia A. Tevlin

Row 9: Linda L. Travis, Margaret Turner, Heidi Unger, Grace M.J. Valmassoi, Sally Van fleeren, Anne VanLoon, Jan Veseth, Anne MArie Villeneuve, Cynthia vrable, Lori E. Weyland, Theresa Wish, Anne Witham, Laura Wollum, Marla Young

School of Nursing Class of 1999

Top Row: Felicia Allen, Michael Anderson, Lisa Armstead, Shannon Arterburn, April Ballard, Stacey Bancroft, Veronica Barcelona, Mary Barringer, Jaralee Basso, Courtney Beck, Karina Bouffard, Becky Bradford, Dawn Burdette, Biance Cerroni

Row 2: Surlin Chadha, James Chambers, Matt Brady, Trish Donovan, Patricia Letowrneau, Amy Prouty, Mary Hawk, Kim Yaekle, Joy Caraan, Jill Awai, Kerry Szymke, Lawra Knapp, Trish Therrian, Kelly Collardey, Julie Collins

Row 3: Kimberly Collins, Jill Collison, Michelle Colvia, Erika Cross, Erin Dassance, Amanda DeFever

Row 4: Janis Dinnel, Corey Eisenberg, Lisa Falzetta, Amy Farley, Jennifer Fulcher, Lori George, Pamela George, Royace A. Gibson

Row 5: Pamela Giles, Nicole Grecu, Janet Green, Jessica Grose, Jill Hall, Jill Hiler, Shamika Hinson, Melissa Hitchcock

Row 6: Rebekah Hopper, Steven Thrke, Kevri Johnson, Rebecca Johnson, Shannon Johnson, Jan Lee, Beverly Jones, Ada Sue Hinshaw, Susan Boehm, Nola Pender, Patricia Coleman Burn, Jody Joslyn, Jennifer Kerr, Erin Kingsley, Heather Knudsen, Kristie Krzyzanski

Row 7: Sarah Kyle, Michelle Laughlis, Julie Leibowitz, Erin Maki, Rachel Malone, Amanda Manoni, Kara marsh, Carrie McClung, Kristi Miller, Kristine Moe, Kimberly Morton, Thecla Moschouris, Meg Mountainbear, Michelle Newberg, Aarti parekh, Heather Pawlak

Row 8: Diana Piergentili, Alison Pinta, Gail Prahaska, Jennifer Pruchnik, Kimberly Rendz, Sarah Repp, Eunice Rhiew, Kyle Rinehart, Roni robarge, Audrey Salazar, Dana Schaffner, Sally Scott, Nicole Sell, Mary Jean Siasoco, Deborah Slizewski, Rebecca Snyder

Row 9: Carmen Taylor, Chereena Tennis, Monigue Tett, Lindsay Thibert, Cindy Thompson, Alpa Tolia, Jessie Ulmer, Shannon Waigle, Jennifer Walsh, MacKenzie Waters, Christie Wiseley, Mari Yelorda

Effects of boron foliar applications on vegetative and reproductive growth of sunflower

Foliar application may be used to supply boron (B) to a crop when B demands are higher than can be supplied via the soil. While B foliar sprays have been used to correct B deficiency in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in the field, no studies have determined the amount of B taken up by sunflower plant parts via foliar application. A study was conducted in which sunflower plants were grown at constant B concentration in nutrient solution with adequate B (46 mum) or with limited B supply (0.24, 0.40 and 1.72 mum) using Amberlite IRA-743 resin to control B supply. At the late vegetative stage of growth (25 and 35 d after transplanting), two foliar sprays were applied of soluble sodium tetraborate (20.8 % B) each at 0, 28, 65, 120 and 1200 mm (each spray equivalent to 0, 0.03, 0.07, 0.13 and 1.3 kg B ha(-1) in 100 L water ha(-1)). The highest rate of B foliar fertilization resulted in leaf burn but had no other evident detrimental effect on plant growth. Under B-deficient conditions, B foliar application increased the vegetative and reproductive dry mass of plants. Foliar application of 28-1200 mm B increased the total dry mass of the most B-deficient plants by more than three-fold and that of plants grown initially with 1.72 mum B in solution by 37-49 %. In this latter treatment, the dry mass of the capitulum was similar to that achieved under control conditions, but in no instance was total plant dry mass similar to that of the control. All B foliar spray rates increased the B concentration in various parts of the plant tops, including those that developed after the sprays were applied, but the B concentration in the roots was not increased by B foliar application. The B concentration in the capitulum of the plants sprayed at the highest rate was between 37 and 93 % of that in the control plants. This study showed that B foliar application was of benefit to B-deficient sunflower plants, increasing the B status of plant tops, including that of the capitulum which developed after the B sprays were applied. (C) 2003 Annals of Botany Company.

The morning after the night before: campfires revisited

Even eight hours after a campfire has been extinguished with sand, it retains sufficient heat to cause a full-thickness burn with contact of one second. Because extinguishing with sand disguises the danger, this is a particular hazard for children. The only safe way to extinguish a campfire is with water.

Measuring functional outcome in paediatric patients with burns: methodological considerations

Methodological criticisms of research undertaken in the area of paediatric burns are widespread. To date, quasi-experimental research designs have most frequently been used to examine the impact of impairments such as scarring and reduced ran e of motion on functional outcomes. Predominantly, these studies have utilised a narrow definition of functioning (e.g. school attendance) to determine a child's level of participation in activities post-burn injury. Until recently, there had been little attempt to develop and/or test a theoretical model of functional outcome with these children. Using a conceptual model of functional outcome based oil the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, this review paper outlines the current state of the research literature and presents explanatory case study methodology as an alternative research design to further advance the Study of functional outcome post-burn injury. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

Treatment of partial-thickness burns: A prospective, randomized trial using Transcyte (TM)

Background: The purpose of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of three burns dressings (TransCyte, a bio-engineered skin substitute; Biobrane; and Silvazine cream (silver sulphadiazine and 0.2% chlorhexidine)), in treating children with partial-thickness burns. The primary objective was to determine the days until greater than or equal to90% re-epithelialization. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the number of wounds requiring autografting and the number of dressing changes/local wound care required. Methods: Study wounds were identified on each patient and the patients were randomized to receive TransCyte or Biobrane or Silvazine. Assessment of study wound closure began at 2 days after treatment and continued at least every other day thereafter until the wounds re-epithelialized or were autografted. A laser Doppler imaging system was used as an adjunct to assessing the depth of the burn. Results: Thirty-three patients with 58 wound sites enrolled in the study (TransCyte, n = 20, Biobrane, n = 17; Silvazine, n = 21). Mean time to re-epithelialization was 7.5 days for TransCyte, 9.5 days for Biobrane, and 11.2 days for Silvazine. The number of wounds requiring autografting were 5/21 (24%) for Silvazine, 3/17 (17%) for Biobrane, and 1/20 (5%) for TransCyte. Conclusions: When used in partial-thickness burns in children, TransCyte promotes fastest re-epithelialization and required less overall dressings then Biobrane or Silvazine. Patients who received Silvazine or Biobrane require more autografting than those treated with TransCyte.