Educational pathways of minority youth in Norway: intersections of gender, ethnicity and social class

Educational aspirations during lower secondary school and choice of upper secondary education are important for young people’s future trajectories into higher education and labour market positions. In line with ideas about reflexive, autonomous individuals (Giddens, 1991), choice of education is often represented as a young person’ individual decision, and educational guidance as aimed at discovering what ‘fits’ an individual’s personality, interests and abilities. Educational aspirations and choices are also social patterns that are reproduced. Some population categories represent exceptions from expected patterns of social reproduction of educational level and professions. In several countries, one such category is young people from families with migration experiences (Lauglo, 2000; Modood, 2004). In Norway, students have a legal right to non-compulsory upper secondary schooling and 96 percent of the students continue from lower to upper secondary school. In spite of positive developments regarding minority youths’ completion of upper secondary and higher education in later years, studies still persistently show lower educational attainment among minority youth, particularly among boys (Fekjaer, 2006). However, in lower secondary school, minor ity youth tend to have markedly higher educational aspirations and stronger learning motivation than their majority peers, as well as greater effort in school and strong adherence to school values (Lauglo, 2000) despite lower educational attainment or lower socio-economic backgrounds. In addition, gender differences in educational aspirations seem to be smaller among minority youth. The principal objective of the study in progress that will be presented in this paper, is to describe how processes relating to gendered, ethnic and class-based identities influence young people’s educational choices. The study is undertaken as a PhD project in social anthropology. The methodological approach is ethnographic longitudinal fieldwork in two multicultural lower secondary schools in Oslo. The study is part of a larger project that also include quantitative analyses of longitudinal data covering 9th graders in Oslo 2006 through four data collections during lower and upper secondary school.

Validation of the French version of the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC): Influence of gender and age on personality traits from 8 to 12 years

The study was designed to investigate the psychometric properties of the French version and the cross-language replicability of the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC). The HiPIC is an instrument aimed at assessing the five dimensions of the Five-Factor Model for Children. Subjects were 552 children aged between 8 and 12 years, rated by one or both parents. At the domain level, reliability ranged from .83 to .93 and at the facet level, reliability ranged from .69 to .89. Differences between genders were congruent with those found in the Dutch sample. Girls scored higher on Benevolence and Conscientiousness. Age was negatively correlated with Extraversion and Imagination. For girls, we also observed a decrease of Emotional Stability. A series of exploratory factor analyses confirmed the overall five-factor structure for girls and boys. Targeted factor analyses and congruence coefficients revealed high cross-language replicability at the domain and at the facet levels. The results showed that the French version of the HiPIC is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing personality with children and has a particularly high cross-language replicability.

Gender, family and employment in comparative perspective: the realities and representations of rqual rpportunities in Britain and France

In this paper, we will explore how contrasting national discourses relating to women, and gender equality have been incorporated into and reflected in national policies. In the first section, we will outline the recent history of EU equal opportunities policy, in which positive action has been replaced by a policy of 'mainstreaming'. Second, we will describe the evolution of policies towards women and equal opportunities in Britain and France. It will be argued that whereas some degree of positive action for women has been accepted in Britain, this policy is somewhat alien to French thinking about equality - although pro-natalist French policies have resulted in favourable conditions for employed mothers in France. In the third section, we will present some attitudinal evidence, drawn from national surveys, which would appear to reflect the national policy differences we have identified in respect of the 'equality agenda'. In the fourth section, we will draw upon biographical interviews carried out with men and women in British and French banks in order to illustrate the impact of these cross-national differences within organizations and on individual lives. We demonstrate that positive action gender equality policies have made an important impact in British banks, while overt gender exclusionary practices still persist in the French banks studied. In the conclusion, we reflect on the European policy implications of our findings.

Criteris d'avaluació de la credibilitat en les denúncies de violència de gènere

La Llei Integral de Mesures contra la Violència de Gènere estableix una sèrie de mesures legislatives que tenen per objecte el reconeixement dels drets de les víctimes de la violència, enfortir la sensibilitat ciutadana davant de la violència de gènere, instaurar un sistema de serveis socials d’atenció i de recuperació de les víctimes, garantir els seus drets econòmics i laborals, instaurar un sistema institucional de tutela, determinar un marc penal i processal i garantir la coordinació de tots aquells recursos que es dediquen a aquesta qüestió. Conscients de la importància d’aquesta Llei, de les dificultats que deriven de la seva aplicació, així com de la nostra experiència en la pràctica forense en casos de violència domèstica i de gènere, neix la idea de realitzar la recerca d’aquest estudi. Una recerca que pretén establir, a partir de l’anàlisi dels relats de dones víctimes de violència de gènere en la relació de parella, criteris de credibilitat que permetin validar les seves declaracions. Criteris obtinguts a partir de les mateixes paraules de les víctimes. Partint d’una metodologia mixta, quantitativa i qualitativa, hem obtingut uns resultats que ens han permès definir un sistema de criteris de credibilitat genuïns i discriminadors. Una discriminació obtinguda a partir de la comparació de les declaracions de dues mostres: víctimes reals i víctimes simulades. I, fruit d’aquesta comparació, la discontinuïtat narrativa, els detalls estranys, la reproducció de converses, les correccions espontànies, l’ambivalència i ambigüitat vers l’agressor, la violència indirecta, suscitant por i terror, la por a les represàlies, la imposició i intimitat del secret, la indefensió, l’evolució de la violència i progressió de la asimetria de poder, la dualitat de la conducta domèstica / imatge social de l’home, el control ampli masculí cognitiu-conductual, la descripció contextualitzada de microviolències, les estratègies de supervivència de la dona i el relat inhibit amb vergonya, han resultat criteris de credibilitat de les dones víctimes de violència de gènere que ens permetran validar el seu relat.

Criterios de evaluación de la credibilidad en las denuncias de violencia de género

Esta investigación contrasta los relatos de dos muestras de mujeres. La primera, víctimas reales de violencia de género en la relación de pareja; la segunda, deliberadamente ofrecen relatos falsos sobre esta misma problemática. Los resultados muestran una diferencia cualitativa significativa en base a los criterios de credibilidad definidos. Al mismo tiempo, el estudio ha encontrado otros criterios de credibilidad genuinos, que conforman el discurso explicativo que permite validar sus declaraciones.