Disturbances in microbiota - cause or effect?

IBD are a group of complex polygenetic diseases also involving environmental factors. Evidence for a role for bacteria in IBD include an increased abundance of mucosa-associated bacteria in IBD (which occurs even where there is no intestinal inflammation), and the positive impact of antibiotics on the progress of both Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) of the pouch - pouchitis. Bacteria are necessary for most animal models of IBD. The increased abundance of mucosal bacteria in IBD is not non-specific because while some mucosal bacteria are more abundant this is not the case for all mucosal bacteria including the very abundant Bacteroides vulgatus. On the other hand, antibiotic treatments are not curative, and the humoral immune Ig response to bacterial antigens which is more evident in CD, appears to be polyclonal. While this argues against a role for specific bacteria causing a classical infection, certain mucosal bacteria may damage the mucosal barrier. This would promote invasion by other commensal mucosal bacteria triggering an immune response. Altered adaptive, and to a lesser extent, innate immunity have been extensively studied, and genetic defects in the CARD15 (or NOD2) gene that encodes a bacterial sensing protein modulating innate and adaptive immunity are strongly associated with ileal CD. However, the penetrance of the homozygous CARD15 frameshift mutation, which is the most strongly CD-associated genotype, is very low with only 4% of humans with this developing CD. Furthermore, mice with the same defects in CARD15 do not develop spontaneous ileitis or colitis. Therefore, there have to be other aetiological factor(s). Altered permeability is a consistent finding in subclinical CD. There are other data to suggest that altered mucin is an early event in UC. We propose that the pathogenesis of IBD is multifactorial involving specific mucosal bacteria, defective barrier function and altered mucosal immunity in an aetiology triangle.

Interface between domestic and wild carnivores in an environmental protection area in the brazilian Amazon: indicators and aplications for conservation

The presence of domestic animals in protected areas has been a growing world concern, including in the Brazilian Amazon. Introduced domestic carnivores can put the conservation of carnivores and other wild mammals at risk in protected areas. These risks can be associated with direct factors, such as the dogs` hunting habit, and indirect factors, such as the domestic carnivores` potential for transmitting infectious agents to wild populations. The objective of this study was to analyze the potential implications of humans and domestic animals staying in fragmented and altered areas such as the Wildlife Protection Areas (WPA) in the Tucuruf Lake Environmental Protection Area (Para, Brazil), created for the full protection of its fauna and flora. This evaluation was made through interviews conducted with riparian inhabitants living in the WPA and surrounding area, involving issues related to the presence of dogs (number of animals per domicile, birth rate, mortality rate, vaccination status, hunting habit) and wild carnivores (occurrence and location) in the study area. The results indicated risks mainly due to the presence of on average three dogs per domicile, as well as the high canine birth rate, their hunting habits, low vaccination rates and evidence of direct and indirect contact with the human, canine and wild carnivore populations. These factors represent risks to the health and conservation of Tucurui EPA wild carnivores since they provide favorable conditions for the transmission of pathogens from domestic fauna to wild fauna, as well as the risks brought about by hunting.