784 resultados para Australian General Practice Patients
Resumo:
Objective To determine the safety and effectiveness of nurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care by investigating adverse events and the management of calls.
Resumo:
Objective: To compare the implications of four widely used cholesterol screening and treatment guidelines by applying them to a population in the United Kingdom.
Resumo:
A multirresistência bacteriana tem crescido significativamente nos últimos anos. Entre os gram negativos a P. aeruginosa demonstra facilidade de desenvolvimento de resistência aos antibióticos. O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar a frequência de resistência a múltiplos fármacos em isolados de Pseudomonas aeruginosa e detectar cepas multirresistentes em um hospital público de Maceió/AL. De forma retrospectiva, descritiva e transversal, entre janeiro de 2012 a dezembro de 2013, iniciou-se uma ampla análise documental dos registros de atendimento no setor de Microbiologia do Hospital Universitário Professor Alberto Antunes (HUPAA/UFAL) para avaliar o material obtido de pacientes que apresentaram cultura positiva para P. aeruginosa. Vários espécimes clínicos foram obtidos e as cepas identificadas fenotipicamente pelo método automatizado Vitek®, bem como as análises do perfil de susceptibilidade aos antimicrobianos, seguindo os critérios adotados pelo National Committee for Clinical and Laboratory Standards (NCCLS). Foram obtidas 78 culturas com isolados positivos para P. aeruginosa, sendo a maioria procedente de pacientes da UTI geral (47,4%), seguida da Clínica cirúrgica (16,7%). Entre as amostras clínicas analisadas, a secreção traqueal foi a de maior incidência com 25,6%, seguida de secreção de ferida (20,5%) e escarro (18%). O composto mais ativo contra a P. aeruginosa foi a Colistina (100,0%). Detectou-se elevada multirresistência de P. aeruginosa aos betalactâmicos, cefalosporinas e carbapenêmicos. Baseando-se nos dados apresentados, torna-se evidente a necessidade de um monitoramento rotineiro do perfil de sensibilidade desta bactéria em ambiente hospitalar, sendo de extrema utilidade para a escolha adequada na terapêutica empírica, proporcionando conhecimento prévio dos antimicrobianos que apresentam boa eficácia diante deste patógeno, favorecendo o uso racional de antimicrobianos. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Multirresistência; Pseudomonas aeruginosa;Sensibilidade; Antimicrobianos.
Resumo:
BACKGROUND One-lung ventilation during thoracic surgery is associated with hypoxia-reoxygenation injury in the deflated and subsequently reventilated lung. Numerous studies have reported volatile anesthesia-induced attenuation of inflammatory responses in such scenarios. If the effect also extends to clinical outcome is yet undetermined. We hypothesized that volatile anesthesia is superior to intravenous anesthesia regarding postoperative complications. METHODS Five centers in Switzerland participated in the randomized controlled trial. Patients scheduled for lung surgery with one-lung ventilation were randomly assigned to one of two parallel arms to receive either propofol or desflurane as general anesthetic. Patients and surgeons were blinded to group allocation. Time to occurrence of the first major complication according to the Clavien-Dindo score was defined as primary (during hospitalization) or secondary (6-month follow-up) endpoint. Cox regression models were used with adjustment for prestratification variables and age. RESULTS Of 767 screened patients, 460 were randomized and analyzed (n = 230 for each arm). Demographics, disease and intraoperative characteristics were comparable in both groups. Incidence of major complications during hospitalization was 16.5% in the propofol and 13.0% in the desflurane groups (hazard ratio for desflurane vs. propofol, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.46 to 1.22; P = 0.24). Incidence of major complications within 6 months from surgery was 40.4% in the propofol and 39.6% in the desflurane groups (hazard ratio for desflurane vs. propofol, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.28; P = 0.71). CONCLUSIONS This is the first multicenter randomized controlled trial addressing the effect of volatile versus intravenous anesthetics on major complications after lung surgery. No difference between the two anesthesia regimens was evident.
Resumo:
"December 2000."
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Scientific exhibit presented at American Academy of General Practice Meeting, Los Angeles, March 28-31, 1955.
Resumo:
Objective: To identify factors influencing the prescribing of medicines by general practitioners in rural and remote Australia. Design: A qualitative study using a questionnaire to determine attitudes about prescribing, specific prescribing habits and comments on prescribing in ‘rural practice’. Setting: General practice in rural and remote Queensland. Subjects: General practitioners practising in rural and remote settings in Queensland (n = 258). Main outcome measures: The factors perceived to influence the prescribing of medicines by medical practitioners in rural environments. Results: A 58% response rate (n = 142) was achieved. Most respondents agreed that they prescribe differently in rural compared with city practice. The majority of respondents agreed that their prescribing was influenced by practice location, isolation of patient home location, limited diagnostic testing and increased drug monitoring. Location issues and other issues were more likely to be identified as ‘influential’ by the more isolated practitioners. Factors such as access to continuing medical education and specialists were confirmed as having an influence on prescribing. The prescribing of recently marketed drugs was more likely by doctors practising in less remote rural areas. Conclusion: Practising in rural and remote locations is perceived to have an effect on prescribing. These influences need to be considered when developing quality use of medicines policies and initiatives for these locations. What is already known: Anecdotal and audit based studies have shown that rural general practice differs to urban-based practice in Australia, including some limited data showing some variations in prescribing patterns. No substantiated explanations for these variations have been offered. It is known that interventions to change prescribing behaviour are more likely to be effective if they are perceived as relevant and hence increasing our knowledge of rural doctors’ perceptions of differences in rural practice prescribing is required. What this study adds: Rural doctors believed that they prescribe differently in rural compared with city practice and they described a range of influences. The more remotely located doctors were more likely to report the ‘rural’ influences on prescribing, however, most results failed to reach statistical significance when compared to the less remotely located doctors. These perceptions should be considered when developing medicines policy and education for rural medical practitioners to ensure it is perceived rurally relevant.
Resumo:
Objectives. To assess the efficacy of a prolotherapy injection and exercise protocol in the treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Design. Randomized controlled trial with two- by- two factorial design, triple- blinded for injection status, and single- blinded for exercise status. Setting. General practice. Participants. One hundred ten participants with nonspecific low- back pain of average 14 years duration were randomized to have repeated prolotherapy ( 20% glucose/ 0.2% lignocaine) or normal saline injections into tender lumbo- pelvic ligaments and randomized to perform either flexion/ extension exercises or normal activity over 6 months. Main outcome measures: Pain intensity ( VAS) and disability scores ( Roland- Morris) at 2.5, 4, 6, 12, and 24 months. Results. Follow- up was achieved in 96% at 12 months and 80% at 2 years. Ligament injections, with exercises and with normal activity, resulted in significant and sustained reductions in pain and disability throughout the trial, but no attributable effect was found for prolotherapy injections over saline injections or for exercises over normal activity. At 12 months, the proportions achieving more than 50% reduction in pain from baseline by injection group were glucose- lignocaine: 0.46 versus saline: 0.36. By activity group these proportions were exercise: 0.41 versus normal activity: 0.39. Corresponding proportions for > 50% reduction in disability were glucose- lignocaine: 0.42 versus saline 0.36 and exercise: 0.36 versus normal activity: 0.38. There were no between group differences in any of the above measures. Conclusions. In chronic nonspecific low- back pain, significant and sustained reductions in pain and disability occur with ligament injections, irrespective of the solution injected or the concurrent use of exercises.