A comparison of mucosal surface area and villous histology in small intestines of the brazilian free-tailed bat (Tadarida brasiliensis) and the mouse (Mus musculus)

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)

Structure, histochemistry and seasonal variations of the male reproductive accessory glands in the Pallas’s mastiff bat, Molossus molossus (Chiroptera: Molossidae)

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Comparative analysis of the male reproductive accessory glands of bat species from the five brazilian subfamilies of the family phyllostomidae (Chiroptera)

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Redescription and taxonomical considerations about Aonchotheca (Aonchotheca) pulchra n. comb. (Enoplida: Trichuridae), a nematode of Nyctinomops spp.

Pterothominx pulchra (Freitas, 1934) are little known gastric nematodes of Nyctinomops laticaudatus (Chiroptera: Molossidae). Information about the occurrence and host range of these parasites in Neotropical region is still scanty, and the only two morphological descriptions available in the literature are divergent about the presence or absence of a spiny spicular sheath in males, which may lead to incorrect taxonomical positioning, since this feature represents the main difference between the genera Pterothominx and Aonchotheca. Based on the absence of this morphological feature in specimens of this nematode obtained from N. laticaudatus and Nyctinomops macrotis bats captured in two municipalities in the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil, the present study reclassifies the aforementioned species in the genus Aonchotheca and allocates it to the subgenus Aonchotheca. Additional morphometric data and new host and locality records are also provided.

Evaluation of short-interfering RNAs treatment in experimental rabies due to wild-type virus

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Assembleia, frugivoria e biologia reprodutiva de morcegos em áreas restauradas

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Caracterização da fauna de morcegos (Mammalia, Chiroptera) e ocorrência de vírus rábico na região noroeste do Estado de São Paulo, Brasil

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Estudos helmintológicos em quirópteros no bioma Amazônia

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)

Morfologia do útero e ovários de Artibeus planirostris (Phyllostomidae: Chiroptera) durante as fases do ciclo reprodutivo

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Refuge Update – July/August 2006, Volume 3, Number 4

Table of Contents: Taking the Bighorns Home, page 9 Focus on . . . Transportation, page 10-18 Living and Learning the Desert, page 21 Studying Bats, Coast to Coast, page 24

Refuge Update – November/December 2009, Volume 6, Number 6

Table of Contents: Tufted Puffin Released A rehabilitated puffin gingerly tests freedom at Oregon Islands National Wildlife Refuge. FOCUS: Stories of Hope From cemeteries to woodpeckers, to newspaper columns and support at the ballot box, refuges represent stories of hope as they pursue their mission. Bats in the Barn Scientists and volunteers wrap a barn in plastic and count the bats inside. Sense of Wonder Award Jim Burkhart shares the joy and mysteries of the natural world with visitors to Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge, GA.

SCWDS Briefs: Volume 25, Number 2 (July 2009)

Table of Contents: Piroplasmosis Hits Missouri Horses Cytauxzoon felis in Wild Felids SCIF & Mossy Oak Fund HD Research Hardware Disease in a Key Deer Wildlife Poisoning in Kansas Swine Brucellosis Infects Hog Hunters SCWDS Personnel Changes NWHC Has New Director New USDI Publication on Bats Recent SCWDS Publications Available

URBAN WILDLIFE: CAN WE LIVE WITH THEM?

ABSTRACT: A survey of Extension Wildlife Specialists in the U.S. provided a basis for estimating the magnitude of urban wildlife damage and control in this country. Response to the 9-question mail questionnaire was good (76 percent) following the single mailing to all Extension Wildlife Specialists or people in similar positions listed in the national directory. The majority of questions were answered based upon the experiences and best estimates of these specialists for the interval October 1986-September 1987. Specialists had difficulty providing estimates of damage and costs of prevention and control; 57 percent were not able to provide any data on these topics. Several of the questions dealt with attitudes of people requesting urban wildlife information and/or assistance and wide ranges of responses were received to most of these questions. Most people (78 percent) appeared willing to implement prevention/control measures recommended by these specialists, more than half (61 percent) wanted the animal handled/removed by someone else, and only about 40 percent wanted the damage stopped regardless of cost. Also, slightly over half (55 percent) of clientele represented did not want the offending animal harmed in any way. These results were highly variable from state to state. Several differences were noted in overall responses regarding urban wildlife species. Requests for information were received most frequently for bats and snakes, but both of these groups of animals ranked very low in terms of actual damage reported. The most frequently mentioned groups of animals causing damage in urban areas were roosting birds (including pigeons, starlings, and sparrows), woodpeckers (especially flickers), tree squirrels, bats, and moles. In terms of actual dollar values of damage done, white-tailed deer and pocket gophers apparently caused the most estimated damage. Due to these differences, it is necessary to know which criteria are being used to make an assessment of the relative importance of animal damage control problems. Techniques for controlling urban wildlife damage, such as exclusion, live-trapping, repellents, and poisons, are compared and discussed in some detail in this paper. As urbanization occurs across the nation, concerns about urban wildlife damage will continue; in most cases, we can and will live among these creatures.

Two-chamber Rocket Box Bat House Plans

Plans and instructions for building a “Two-chamber Rocket Box” bat-house to accommodate large numbers (>200) of bats. See further: http://www.batcon.org/educatorsK/pdfs/fof_bathouse.pdf

The Probe, Issue 166 – June 1996

Why NADCA? One Region Director's Opinion Peter H. Butchko, NADCA Region 9 Director, The Turtle and the Hare (Wildlife Damage Version), by Robert H. Schmidt Point of View: Mad Cow Disease Dolomitic Hydrated Lime Feeding Deterrent to Birds Booklet Review: A Homeowners Guide to North Eastern Bats and Bat Problems. By Lisa M. Williams-Whitmer and Margaret C. Brittingham. August, 1995 Penn State University. Pp. 1-22.