Retinal microvascular network attenuation in Alzheimer's disease

INTRODUCTION:Cerebral small-vessel disease has been implicated in the development of Alzheimer’sdisease (AD). The retinal microvasculature enables non-invasive visualization andevaluation of the systemic microcirculation. We evaluated retinal microvascular parametersin a case-control study of AD patients and cognitively-normal controls. 

METHODS:Retinal images were computationally analyzed and quantitative retinal parameters (caliber,fractal dimension, tortuosity, and bifurcation) measured. Regression models were used tocompute odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (CI) for AD with adjustment forconfounders. 

RESULTS:Retinal images were available in 213 AD participants and 294 cognitively-normal controls.Persons with lower venular fractal dimension (OR per standard deviation [SD] increase, 0.77[CI: 0.62–0.97]) and lower arteriolar tortuosity (OR per SD increase, 0.78 [CI: 0.63–0.97])were more likely to have AD following appropriate adjustment. 
DISCUSSION:Patients with AD have a sparser retinal microvascular network and retinal microvascularvariation may represent similar pathophysiological events within the cerebralmicrovasculature of patients with AD.

Patient-reported outcomes in randomised controlled trials on age-related macular degeneration

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the frequency and type of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

METHODS: The authors conducted a systematic search between January 2010 and November 2013 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library (Central) and the clinical trials registries (http://www.controlled-trials.com and http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov) according to defined inclusion criteria (RCTs on AMD in English). Two independent reviewers evaluated studies for inclusion. One reviewer extracted data of included studies, and a second masked reviewer assessed 10% to confirm accuracy in data collection. Reference lists of included papers and appendices of relevant Cochrane systematic reviews were scanned to identify other relevant RCTs. Information collected on extracted outcomes was analysed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS: Literature and registry search yielded 3816 abstracts of journal articles and 493 records from trial registries. A total of 177 RCTs were deemed to have met inclusion criteria. Of the 858 outcomes reported, 38 outcomes were identified as PROMs (4.4%). Of the 177 RCTs examined, PROMs were used in 25 trials (14.1%). The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 was the most frequently used PROM instrument (64% of RCTs with PROMs included).

CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights that a small proportion of AMD RCTs included PROMs as outcome measures and that there was a variety in the instruments used.