Challenges for expatriate managers:an exploration of cross-cultural management, adjustment, and training issues faced by Anglo-American managers in Hong Kong

This field work study furthers understanding about expatriate management, in particular, the nature of cross-cultural management in Hong Kong involving Anglo-American expatriate and Chinese host national managers, the important features of adjustment for expatriates living and working there, and the type of training which will assist them to adjust and to work successfully in this Asian environment. Qualitative and quantitative data on each issue was gathered during in-depth interviews in Hong Kong, using structured interview schedules, with 39 expatriate and 31 host national managers drawn from a cross-section of functional areas and organizations. Despite the adoption of Western technology and the influence of Western business practices, micro-level management in Hong Kong retains a cultural specificity which is consistent with the norms and values of Chinese culture. There are differences in how expatriates and host nationals define their social roles, and Hong Kong's recent colonial history appears to influence cross-cultural interpersonal interactions. The inability of the spouse and/or family to adapt to Hong Kong is identified as a major reason for expatriate assignments to fail, though the causes have less to do with living away from family and friends, than with Hong Kong's highly urbanized environment and the heavy demands of work. Culture shock is not identified as a major problem, but in Hong Kong micro-level social factors require greater adjustment than macro-level societal factors. The adjustment of expatriate managers is facilitated by a strong orientation towards career development and hard work, possession of technical/professional expertise, and a willingness to engage in a process of continuous 'active learning' with respect to the host national society and culture. A four-part model of manager training suitable for Hong Kong is derived from the study data. It consists of a pre-departure briefing, post-arrival cross-cultural training, language training in basic Cantonese and in how to communicate more effectively in English with non-native speakers, and the assignment of a mentor to newly arrived expatriate managers.

Polyol transport in yeast: studying transport proteins and manipulating osmotic responses

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae MIP channel Fps1p plays an important role in yeast osmoregulation by exporting glycerol. Glycerol accumulates in the cell as a compatible osmolyte during hyperosmotic conditions and is exported once conditions become hypotonic. A gpd1 gpd2 mutant is unable to produce glycerol and is therefore very sensitive to high concentrations of polyols in the growth medium. The sensitivity to C3, C4 and C5, but not C6 polyols, is suppressed by expression of truncated, hyperactive Fps1p. This is because the polyols can then equilibrate over the membrane and hence the concentration gradient collapses. This experiments reveals the substrate spectrum of Fps1p. The system can be used in different ways. For instance, growth assays on different polyols elucidate the substrate range of heterologous channels such as that of the rat aquaglyceroporin AQP9. In addition, the same system is used to search for novel hyperactive mutants of Fps1p, which provide additional information on the mechanism underlying channel regulation. Finally we illustrate that the gpd1 gpd2 double mutant expressing hyperactive Fps1p can be used to manipulate activation and deactivation of the HOG pathway, contributing to our understanding of the control of this osmoregulatory system.

Inward investment, industry concentration and the speed of adjustment

T his paper seeks to examine the relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI) and industry concentration. Previous work in the area is somewhat contradictory in terms of the effect that FDI may be expected to have on host-country market structure. In addition, work which seeks to use concentration as a determinant of FDI (or indeed entry in a more generic sense) is rather ambiguous. This paper seeks to resolve these issues, and argues that inward FDI is more likely to reduce concentration by increasing competition than it is to increase monopoly power. In addition, the paper will show that the role of concentration in explaining FDI is more complex than has previously been understood. This paper is constructed as follows: Section II discusses the hypothesized relationship between market concentration and FDI, while Sections III, IV and V develop the models employed and discuss the econometric issues. Finally Sections VI and VII discuss the results and present some conclusions.