978 resultados para 090 Manuscripts
Resumo:
16~5562,,X,16~5541(24.609.82)mg/Kg(0.780.25)(2.840.65)mg/L,(12.504.55)mg/kg(0.180.11)(2.090.64)mg/L;(1.000.52)mg/kg(0.100.10)(2.741.42)mg/L,(1.391.34)mg/kg(0.040.03)(0.870.43)mg/L;(P<0.01)ASTLDHHBDHALP(P<0.01)X50.00%,61.29%,33.87%,29.03%,8.06%;2.44%,34.15%,21.95%,2.44%,2.44%,X(P<0.01),,,
Resumo:
A simple double logarithmic method in potential-controlled thin-layer spectroelectrochemistry for an irreversible electrochemical process has been studied by numerical analysis and examined by experimental examples. This simple algorithm has a novel function offering some important information about the mechanism of a complex electrochemical process directly from a limited amount of potential-spectrum data, and can be used to distinguish different reaction mechanisms such as E, EC, EE, as well as to determine the electron-transfer coefficient, a, and the kinetically modified E-0'. Combination of the double logarithmic method with nonlinear regression provides a powerful tool to examine the proposed mechanism and also to estimate other thermodynamic and kinetic parameters. (C) 1999 The Electrochemical Society. S0013-4651(98)06-090-X. All rights reserved.
Resumo:
(SCS)-(EVA),(-OH)SCS:+(80/20W/W)S_1=42.770.08ppm,S_2=7.1550.06ppm,S_3(s)=-4.080.02ppm,S_3(t)=-3.090.02ppm,S_4=0.480.03ppm,S_5=0.260.05ppm,S_1=44.970.61ppm,S_2=7.400.00ppm,S_3(s)=-4.510.17ppm,S_3(t)=-3.130.00ppm,S_4=0.630.04ppm,S_5=0.360.00ppm,SCS~(13)C NMR
Resumo:
Fenneropenaeus chinensis is confined to the Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea in China and the West Coast of the Korean Peninsula. Intra- and intercross populations were produced between Rushany (YP) and Korean (KN) populations. Seven traits were recorded. The heterosis of hybrids was computed and comparison between treatments was performed by ANOVA. At the fourth month after post-larvae, six indexes of growth trait and viability showed a range of heterosis, ranging from 0.514% to 14.950%. At the fifth month after post-larvae, six indexes of growth trait and viability ranged from -9.000% to 19.090%. The negative heterosis was observed in CL, HST and viability. The heterosis of KN female xYP male tended generally to increase as the age of the Chinese shrimp increased while the heterosis of YP female xKN male tended to decrease. The results indicated that the viability of reciprocal hybrids were not significantly different (P > 0.05) from their parents during the experiment. The result of ANOVA indicated that the F1 hybrids were significantly different (P < 0.05) in WST and TW at the fourth month. The multiple comparisons of LSD test indicated that the hybrids of YP female xKN male were significantly different (P < 0.05) from their parents in TW. The hybrids of YP female xKN male were significantly different (P < 0.05) from the other three combinations in WST. At the fifth months, the F1 hybrids had significant difference (P < 0.05) in body weight while other traits showed no significant differences (P > 0.05) from their parents. The multiple comparisons of LSD test indicated that the hybrids of KN female xYP male were significantly different (P < 0.05) from the KN parents in TW. The results indicate that in experimental conditions, the F-1 hybrids created from two populations of Chinese shrimp showed a certain level of heterosis for growth performance and viability. The crossing scheme may improve growth performance and viability in Chinese shrimp, but the improvement may be limited because effective crossbreeding requires the maintenance of pure, preferably inbred, lines and possibly involves specialized sire and dam lines. Therefore, the exploitation of heterosis through single crossbreeding in Chinese shrimp is of limited utility in practical commercial shrimp aquaculture in spite of the potential of significant heterosis. The crossbreeding of different populations can be applied in the establishment of base populations.
Resumo:
1. WYPWKN2TLCLCW23HST23WSTBW73WYP WKN(4.37%23.96% )WYPWKNWKN WYP(X1)(X2)23(X3)(X4)23(X5)Y = 2.056 + 0.03X1 + 0.076X2 + 0.078X3 + 0.033X4 + 0.043X5 2. WYPWKN2460.514%14.95%WYPWKN7WKNWYP5-9.000%19.090%233WKNWYPWYPWKNANOVA4WSTBW2LSDWYPWKNBWWST35LSDWKNWYPWKN 3. 2WKNWYP3FKN1HH198JK98JK98 ()  WKN ()WYP () WKN ()WKN () WYP ()FKN ()HH1 () WYP () FKN ()FKN()  HH1()WKN () WYP ()WYP () WKN ()WYP ()FKN () JK98 ()WKN ()JK98 ()  WKN ()5TLCLHSTLLBW5JK98 ()WKN ()TLHSTWKN () WYP ()FKN()  HH1() WYP ()  WKN ()3BWWKN () WYP () FKN()  HH1() 4. 212146TLCLCWHSTWST1FL6LLMTDFREML0.15~0.35TL0.340.071CL0.300.070CW0.350.077WST0.330.073HST0.330.073FL0.150.044LL0.240.059CWTLHSTFLWST 5. F2AFLP55AFLPF2110532AFLP31F211283544109016171772.1 cM2420 cM32.6%AFLPAFLP
Resumo:
Soldatova, L. N., Aubrey, W., King, R. D., Clare, A. J. (2008). The EXACT description of biomedical protocols. Bioinformatics, 24 (13), i295-i303 Sponsorship: BBSRC / RAEng / EPSRC specialissue: ISMB
Resumo:
Trotter, David, 'Les manuscrits latins de la Chirurgia d'Albucasis et la lexicographie du latin m?di?val', Archivum Latinitatis Medii Aevi (Bulletin Du Cange) (2001) 59(1) pp.181-202 RAE2008
Resumo:
Rothwell, W., Femina (Trinity College, Cambridge MS B.14.40); edited with an Introduction and Notes (The Anglo-Norman On-Line Hub, 2005) RAE2008
Resumo:
Artyku prezentuje sylwetki konserwatorw zbiorw, kierownikw i dyrektorw Biblioteki Poznaskiego Towarzystwa Przyjaci Nauk (PTPN) oraz to, co po nich pozostao w postaci archiwaliw. Od momentu powstania Biblioteka PTPN gromadzia rkopisy lub cae spucizny wybitnych osb, w tym kierujcych t placwk. Rwnie inne biblioteki i archiwa zakadowe instytucji, z ktrymi byli oni zwizani, wczay do swych zbiorw ich materiay archiwalne. Spucizny Ludwiki Dobrzyskiej-Rybickiej i Ryszarda Marciniaka znajduj si zarwno w Bibliotece PTPN, jak i w Polskiej Akademii Nauk Archiwum w Warszawie Oddzia w Poznaniu. Znaczna cz materiaw archiwalnych Bolesawa Erzepkiego trafia natomiast do Dziau Zbiorw Specjalnych Biblioteki Raczyskich w Poznaniu. Szcztkowe materiay archiwalne mona te znale w Archiwum Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu (Ludwika Dobrzyska-Rybicka) oraz w Archiwum Biblioteki Uniwersyteckiej w Poznaniu (Ludwika Dobrzyska-Rybicka, Jan Baumgart, Aniela Koehlerwna).
Resumo:
Wydzia Filologii Polskiej i Klasycznej
Resumo:
Projeto de Ps-Graduao/Dissertao apresentado Universidade Fernando Pessoa como parte dos requisitos para obteno do grau de Mestre em Medicina Dentria
Resumo:
On January 11, 2008, the National Institutes of Health ('NIH') adopted a revised Public Access Policy for peer-reviewed journal articles reporting research supported in whole or in part by NIH funds. Under the revised policy, the grantee shall ensure that a copy of the author's final manuscript, including any revisions made during the peer review process, be electronically submitted to the National Library of Medicine's PubMed Central ('PMC') archive and that the person submitting the manuscript will designate a time not later than 12 months after publication at which NIH may make the full text of the manuscript publicly accessible in PMC. NIH adopted this policy to implement a new statutory requirement under which: The Director of the National Institutes of Health shall require that all investigators funded by the NIH submit or have submitted for them to the National Library of Medicine's PubMed Central an electronic version of their final, peer-reviewed manuscripts upon acceptance for publication to be made publicly available no later than 12 months after the official date of publication: Provided, That the NIH shall implement the public access policy in a manner consistent with copyright law. This White Paper is written primarily for policymaking staff in universities and other institutional recipients of NIH support responsible for ensuring compliance with the Public Access Policy. The January 11, 2008, Public Access Policy imposes two new compliance mandates. First, the grantee must ensure proper manuscript submission. The version of the article to be submitted is the final version over which the author has control, which must include all revisions made after peer review. The statutory command directs that the manuscript be submitted to PMC 'upon acceptance for publication.' That is, the author's final manuscript should be submitted to PMC at the same time that it is sent to the publisher for final formatting and copy editing. Proper submission is a two-stage process. The electronic manuscript must first be submitted through a process that requires input of additional information concerning the article, the author(s), and the nature of NIH support for the research reported. NIH then formats the manuscript into a uniform, XML-based format used for PMC versions of articles. In the second stage of the submission process, NIH sends a notice to the Principal Investigator requesting that the PMC-formatted version be reviewed and approved. Only after such approval has grantee's manuscript submission obligation been satisfied. Second, the grantee also has a distinct obligation to grant NIH copyright permission to make the manuscript publicly accessible through PMC not later than 12 months after the date of publication. This obligation is connected to manuscript submission because the author, or the person submitting the manuscript on the author's behalf, must have the necessary rights under copyright at the time of submission to give NIH the copyright permission it requires. This White Paper explains and analyzes only the scope of the grantee's copyright-related obligations under the revised Public Access Policy and suggests six options for compliance with that aspect of the grantee's obligation. Time is of the essence for NIH grantees. As a practical matter, the grantee should have a compliance process in place no later than April 7, 2008. More specifically, the new Public Access Policy applies to any article accepted for publication on or after April 7, 2008 if the article arose under (1) an NIH Grant or Cooperative Agreement active in Fiscal Year 2008, (2) direct funding from an NIH Contract signed after April 7, 2008, (3) direct funding from the NIH Intramural Program, or (4) from an NIH employee. In addition, effective May 25, 2008, anyone submitting an application, proposal or progress report to the NIH must include the PMC reference number when citing articles arising from their NIH funded research. (This includes applications submitted to the NIH for the May 25, 2008 and subsequent due dates.) Conceptually, the compliance challenge that the Public Access Policy poses for grantees is easily described. The grantee must depend to some extent upon the author(s) to take the necessary actions to ensure that the grantee is in compliance with the Public Access Policy because the electronic manuscripts and the copyrights in those manuscripts are initially under the control of the author(s). As a result, any compliance option will require an explicit understanding between the author(s) and the grantee about how the manuscript and the copyright in the manuscript are managed. It is useful to conceptually keep separate the grantee's manuscript submission obligation from its copyright permission obligation because the compliance personnel concerned with manuscript management may differ from those responsible for overseeing the author's copyright management. With respect to copyright management, the grantee has the following six options: (1) rely on authors to manage copyright but also to request or to require that these authors take responsibility for amending publication agreements that call for transfer of too many rights to enable the author to grant NIH permission to make the manuscript publicly accessible ('the Public Access License'); (2) take a more active role in assisting authors in negotiating the scope of any copyright transfer to a publisher by (a) providing advice to authors concerning their negotiations or (b) by acting as the author's agent in such negotiations; (3) enter into a side agreement with NIH-funded authors that grants a non-exclusive copyright license to the grantee sufficient to grant NIH the Public Access License; (4) enter into a side agreement with NIH-funded authors that grants a non-exclusive copyright license to the grantee sufficient to grant NIH the Public Access License and also grants a license to the grantee to make certain uses of the article, including posting a copy in the grantee's publicly accessible digital archive or repository and authorizing the article to be used in connection with teaching by university faculty; (5) negotiate a more systematic and comprehensive agreement with the biomedical publishers to ensure either that the publisher has a binding obligation to submit the manuscript and to grant NIH permission to make the manuscript publicly accessible or that the author retains sufficient rights to do so; or (6) instruct NIH-funded authors to submit manuscripts only to journals with binding deposit agreements with NIH or to journals whose copyright agreements permit authors to retain sufficient rights to authorize NIH to make manuscripts publicly accessible.
Resumo:
BACKGROUND:The Framingham Heart Study (FHS), founded in 1948 to examine the epidemiology of cardiovascular disease, is among the most comprehensively characterized multi-generational studies in the world. Many collected phenotypes have substantial genetic contributors; yet most genetic determinants remain to be identified. Using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from a 100K genome-wide scan, we examine the associations of common polymorphisms with phenotypic variation in this community-based cohort and provide a full-disclosure, web-based resource of results for future replication studies.METHODS:Adult participants (n = 1345) of the largest 310 pedigrees in the FHS, many biologically related, were genotyped with the 100K Affymetrix GeneChip. These genotypes were used to assess their contribution to 987 phenotypes collected in FHS over 56 years of follow up, including: cardiovascular risk factors and biomarkers; subclinical and clinical cardiovascular disease; cancer and longevity traits; and traits in pulmonary, sleep, neurology, renal, and bone domains. We conducted genome-wide variance components linkage and population-based and family-based association tests.RESULTS:The participants were white of European descent and from the FHS Original and Offspring Cohorts (examination 1 Offspring mean age 32 +/- 9 years, 54% women). This overview summarizes the methods, selected findings and limitations of the results presented in the accompanying series of 17 manuscripts. The presented association results are based on 70,897 autosomal SNPs meeting the following criteria: minor allele frequency [greater than or equal to] 10%, genotype call rate [greater than or equal to] 80%, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium p-value [greater than or equal to] 0.001, and satisfying Mendelian consistency. Linkage analyses are based on 11,200 SNPs and short-tandem repeats. Results of phenotype-genotype linkages and associations for all autosomal SNPs are posted on the NCBI dbGaP website at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gap/cgi-bin/study.cgi?id=phs000007.CONCLUSION:We have created a full-disclosure resource of results, posted on the dbGaP website, from a genome-wide association study in the FHS. Because we used three analytical approaches to examine the association and linkage of 987 phenotypes with thousands of SNPs, our results must be considered hypothesis-generating and need to be replicated. Results from the FHS 100K project with NCBI web posting provides a resource for investigators to identify high priority findings for replication.
Resumo:
This file contains a finding aid for the Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research (BASOR) Collection. To access the collection, please contact the archivist (asorarch@bu.edu) at the American Schools of Oriental Research, located at Boston University.
Resumo:
The Khirbet et-Tannur Excavation Records document the 1938 excavation of a Nabataean temple. The excavation was directed by Nelson Glueck. The collection includes level books, excavation diaries, artifacts, and photographs. The collection is being processed. A finding aid for the document portion of the collection is available.
