Effect of phosphates on water treatment : phase III. effects of phosphates on coagulation and sedimentation of turbid waters /

"Final report for the period June 15, 1955 to September 15, 1957 for American Association of Soap and Glycerine Producers."

Ozone in water and waste water treatment : a bibliography.

Mode of access: Internet.

Ozone treatment of secondary effluents from waste-water treatment plants /

Mode of access: Internet.

Pond water treatment.

Reissue of 1954 ed. published by the Dept's Division of Sanitary Engineering, which was issued as the Dept.'s Circular N820.

Wastes from water treatment plants : literature review, results of an Illinois survey, and effects of alum sludge application to cropland /

"SWS Contract report 429." -- Cover.

Water supply, water treatment [microform].

"16 September 1985."

Operator and organizational maintenance manual : tank, steel, vertical, bolted, knockdown, sealed openings, standard bottom and roof, gasoline, oil, or water (type I-pol and potable water, type II-pol and non-potable water), 100 barrel capacity ... 10,000 barrel capacity ....

"May, 1974."

Providing solutions for a better tomorrow : a progress report on U.S. EPA's drinking water treatment technology demonstrations in Ecuador, Mexico and China /

Shipping list no.: 99-0007-P

Water analysis : a practical treatise on the examination of potable water /

Mode of access: Internet.

Occurrence and elimination of cyanobacterial toxins in two Australian drinking water treatment plants

In Australian freshwaters, Anabaena circinalis, Microcystis spp. and Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii are the dominant toxic cyanobacteria. Many of these Surface waters are used as drinking water resources. Therefore, the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia set a guideline for MC-LR toxicity equivalents of 1.3 mug/l drinking, water. However, due to lack of adequate data, no guideline values for paralytic shellfish poisons (PSPs) (e.g. saxitoxins) or cylindrospermopsin (CYN) have been set. In this spot check. the concentration of microcystins (MCs), PSPs and CYN were determined by ADDA-ELISA, cPPA, HPLC-DAD and/or HPLC-MS/MS, respectively, in two water treatment plants in Queensland/Australia and compared to phytoplankton data collected by Queensland Health, Brisbane. Depending on the predominant cyanobacterial species in a bloom, concentrations of up to 8.0, 17.0 and 1.3 mug/l were found for MCs, PSPs and CYN, respectively. However, only traces (< 1.0 mug/l) of these toxins were detected in final water (final product of the drinking water treatment plant) and tap water (household sample). Despite the low concentrations of toxins detected in drinking water, a further reduction of cyanobacterial toxins is recommended to guarantee public safety. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

The optimisation of legacy water treatment works to produce a more consistent final water quality

DUE TO COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS ONLY AVAILABLE FOR CONSULTATION AT ASTON UNIVERSITY LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SERVICES WITH PRIOR ARRANGEMENT

Performance evaluation of reverse osmosis (RO) pre-treatment technologies for in-land brackish water treatment

Integration of renewable energy with desalination technologies has emerged as an attractive solution to augment fresh water supply sustainably. Fouling and scaling are still considered as limiting factors in membrane desalination processes. For brackish water treatment, pre-treatment of reverse osmosis (RO) feed water is a key step in designing RO plants avoiding membrane fouling. This study aims to compare at pilot scale the rejection efficiency of RO membranes with multiple pre-treatment options at different water recoveries (30, 35, 40, 45 and 50%) and TDS concentrations (3500, 4000, and 4500mg/L). Synthetic brackish water was prepared and performance evaluation were carried out using brackish water reverse osmosis (BWRO) membranes (Filmtec LC-LE-4040 and Hydranautics CPA5-LD-4040) preceded by 5 and 1μm cartridge filters, 0.02μm ultra-filtration (UF) membrane, and forward osmosis (FO) membrane using 0.25M NaCl and MgCl2 as draw solutions (DS). It was revealed that FO membrane with 0.25M MgCl2 used as a draw solution (DS) and Ultra-filtration (UF) membrane followed by Filmtec membrane gave overall 98% rejection but UF facing high fouling potential due to high applied pressure. Use of 5 and 1μm cartridge filter prior to Filmtec membrane also showed effective results with 95% salt rejection.