Safety of ondansetron loading doses in children with cancer

INTRODUCTION: In highly emetogenic chemotherapy, the recommended dose of the serotonin-receptor antagonist ondansetron (5 mg/m(2) q8h) may be insufficient to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. In adults, ondansetron-loading doses (OLD) of 32 mg are safe. We aimed to evaluate in children the safety of an OLD of 16 mg/m(2) (top, 24 mg) i.v., followed by two doses of 5 mg/m(2) q8h. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included all pediatric oncology patients having received >/=1 OLD between 2002 and 2005. Adverse events (AE) definitely, probably, or possibly related to OLD were studied, excluding AE not or unlikely related to the OLD. Associations between potential predictors and at least moderate AE were analyzed by mixed logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 167 patients treated with chemotherapy, 37 (22%) received 543 OLD. The most common AE were hypotension, fatigue, injection site reaction, headache, hot flashes/flushes, and dizziness. At least mild AE were described in 139 OLD (26%), at least moderate AE in 23 (4.2%), and severe AE in 5 (0.9%; exact 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4-2.1). Life-threatening or lethal AE were not observed (0.0%; 0.0-0.6). At least moderate AE were significantly more frequent in female patients (odds ratio [OR] 3.5; 95% CI 1.4-8.8; p = 0.010), after erroneously given second OLD (17.0; 1.9-154; p = 0.012) and higher 24 h cumulative surface corrected dose (1.26 per mg/m(2); 1.06-1.51; p = 0.009). OLD given to infants below 2 years were not associated with more frequent AE. CONCLUSIONS: Ondansetron-loading doses of 16 mg/m(2) (top, 24 mg) i.v. seem to be safe in infants, children, and adolescents.

Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Children with Cancer: A Study at a Swiss University Hospital

Background Though complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) are frequently used by children and adolescents with cancer, there is little information on how and why they use it. This study examined prevalence and methods of CAM, the therapists who applied it, reasons for and against using CAM and its perceived effectiveness. Parent-perceived communication was also evaluated. Parents were asked if medical staff provided information on CAM to patients, if parents reported use of CAM to physicians, and what attitude they thought physicians had toward CAM. Study Design All childhood cancer patients treated at the University Children’s Hospital Bern between 2002–2011 were retrospectively surveyed about their use of CAM. Results Data was collected from 133 patients (response rate: 52%). Of those, 53% had used CAM (mostly classical homeopathy) and 25% of patients received information about CAM from medical staff. Those diagnosed more recently were more likely to be informed about CAM options. The most frequent reason for choosing CAM was that parents thought it wouldimprove the patient’s general condition. The most frequent reason for not using CAM was lack of information. Of those who used CAM, 87% perceived positive effects. Conclusions Since many pediatric oncology patients use CAM, patients’ needs should be addressed by open communication between families, treating oncologists and CAM therapists, which will allow parents to make informed and safe choices about using CAM.

Qualidade de vida de pacientes oncológicos na freqüência de um grupo de suporte multidisciplinar

As relações sociais e de apoio constituem um fator importante para melhorar a qualidade de vida dos portadores de doenças crônico-degenerativas. Neste contexto, os grupos multidisciplinares de suporte representam uma prática de atenção à saúde que evidenciam um potencial terapêutico e de aprendizagem para os pacientes, familiares e profissionais de saúde. A finalidade deste estudo foi investigar se o grupo de suporte alterou a qualidade de vida 31 de pacientes portadores de câncer. Trata-se de um estudo descritivo-exploratório com abordagem quantitativa, no qual foi utilizado o questionário EORTC-QLQ-C30, específico para mensurar a qualidade de vida de pacientes oncológicos. O EORTC-QLQ-C30 foi utilizado em duas fases: antes da adesão do paciente ao grupo e após quatro meses de participação do paciente nas atividades grupais. A comparação dos resultados das duas fases mostrou aumento dos escores das Funções e da Medida Global de Saúde e Qualidade de Vida, diminuição dos escores das escalas de sintomas, além de alterações não significativas no item Dificuldades Financeiras. Conclui-se que após as atividades grupais, houve melhora da qualidade de vida dos participantes deste estudo, exceto no que se refere à questão financeira.(AU)

Qualidade de vida de pacientes oncológicos na freqüência de um grupo de suporte multidisciplinar

As relações sociais e de apoio constituem um fator importante para melhorar a qualidade de vida dos portadores de doenças crônico-degenerativas. Neste contexto, os grupos multidisciplinares de suporte representam uma prática de atenção à saúde que evidenciam um potencial terapêutico e de aprendizagem para os pacientes, familiares e profissionais de saúde. A finalidade deste estudo foi investigar se o grupo de suporte alterou a qualidade de vida 31 de pacientes portadores de câncer. Trata-se de um estudo descritivo-exploratório com abordagem quantitativa, no qual foi utilizado o questionário EORTC-QLQ-C30, específico para mensurar a qualidade de vida de pacientes oncológicos. O EORTC-QLQ-C30 foi utilizado em duas fases: antes da adesão do paciente ao grupo e após quatro meses de participação do paciente nas atividades grupais. A comparação dos resultados das duas fases mostrou aumento dos escores das Funções e da Medida Global de Saúde e Qualidade de Vida, diminuição dos escores das escalas de sintomas, além de alterações não significativas no item Dificuldades Financeiras. Conclui-se que após as atividades grupais, houve melhora da qualidade de vida dos participantes deste estudo, exceto no que se refere à questão financeira.(AU)

CONVICÇÕES DE SAÚDE EM PACIENTES COM CÂNCER

O objetivo deste artigo é tecer algumas reflexões acerca das convicções de saúde em pacientes com câncer, participantes de um programa de atendimento multidisciplinar realizado numa universidade da Grande São Paulo. Foram utilizados depoimentos de 06 (seis) pacientes, na forma de entrevistas dirigidas e o conteúdo analisado segundo um modelo de convicção de saúde, o qual preconiza que o paciente terá maiores possibilidades de aderir aos tratamentos, seguindo cinco convicções básicas de saúde, a saber: suscetibilidade, severidade, benefícios, barreiras, eficácia própria. Uma ampliação deste modelo foi proposta por outro estudo que acrescenta mais duas categorias às já existentes: impacto ao diagnóstico e expectativas de futuro.(AU)

CONVICÇÕES DE SAÚDE EM PACIENTES COM CÂNCER

O objetivo deste artigo é tecer algumas reflexões acerca das convicções de saúde em pacientes com câncer, participantes de um programa de atendimento multidisciplinar realizado numa universidade da Grande São Paulo. Foram utilizados depoimentos de 06 (seis) pacientes, na forma de entrevistas dirigidas e o conteúdo analisado segundo um modelo de convicção de saúde, o qual preconiza que o paciente terá maiores possibilidades de aderir aos tratamentos, seguindo cinco convicções básicas de saúde, a saber: suscetibilidade, severidade, benefícios, barreiras, eficácia própria. Uma ampliação deste modelo foi proposta por outro estudo que acrescenta mais duas categorias às já existentes: impacto ao diagnóstico e expectativas de futuro.(AU)

Psychosocial Distress Screening in a Community Cancer Center: An Examination of Gender Differences

Objective: The aim of this study was to gain a better understanding of the needs of male and female oncology patients within a community cancer setting to inform the provision of psychosocial services. Data obtained from 835 single-page measures of oncology patient distress were collected and analyzed to examine the relationship between gender and reported level of distress, the source of this distress, and requests for follow-up from psychosocial service providers.Method: Patients in medical and radiation oncology were given a distress screener tool that included a distress thermometer, a problem checklist, and a list of psychosocial service providers with whom the patient could request to speak.Results: Women reported higher levels of distress than men (p=.003). Women were also more likely than men to endorse practical problems as the cause of their distress (p=.003). A marginally significant relationship between gender and requesting the cancer resource navigator was also found (p=. 059)Conclusion: Gender is a salient factor in reported distress among cancer patients. Although no single variable can entirely explain an individual's response to cancer, male and female patients do appear to have distinctive, gender-specific needs. Psychosocial interventions that account for differences related to gender-role may be particularly beneficial. These results also illustrate the utility of consistent screening practices to better understand and meet the psychosocial needs of oncology

Psychosocial Distress Screening in a Community Cancer Center: An Exploratory Study of Distress Screening Across the Cancer Treatment Continuum

Purpose: The primary goal of this exploratory study is to demonstrate that distress screening across the course of cancer treatment is possible and provides valuable information about patient needs over time. Distress screening is aligned with guidelines from national accrediting organizations and may lead to improved health-related quality of life, satisfaction with medical care, and possibly survival.Methods: Medical, surgical, and radiation oncology patients completed a screening instrument before their appointments during a six-month period. Patients indicated their level of distress on four domains (practical, emotional, health and social concerns). De-identified data was collected, aggregated and descriptive statistics were analyzed.Results: Approximately 3000 screens were collected and 1500 cancer patients were screened. Of patients who indicated distress, 54% demonstrated a distress level of five or greater. Distress level eight was the most frequent level of distress indicated. The Cancer Dietitian was the most commonly requested healthcare team provider. The Health Concern domain was most frequently endorsed.Conclusion: NCCN, IOM and COC guidelines recommend distress screening in all cancer treatment centers, however implementation has proven difficult. This study adds to the literature about distress in cancer patients, demonstrates the feasibility of repeated distress screening and provides a model program demonstrating the implementation of repeated distress screening at a community cancer center. Findings highlight the importance of supportive oncology services due to the prevalence of high levels of distress. Findings demonstrate the importance of the Cancer Dietitian in supportive cancer care. Additionally, the research reveals a potential perceived stigma in seeking psychosocial oncology services.

A standard weight descriptor for dose adjustment in the obese patient

Objective: To develop a standard weight descriptor that can be used for estimation of patient size for obese patients. Patients and methods: Data were available from 3849 patients: 2839 from oncology patients (index data set) and 1010 from general medical patients (validation data set). The patients had a wide range of age (16-100 years), weight (25-165kg) and body mass index (BMI) [12-52 kg/m(2)] in both data sets. From the normal-weight patients in the oncology data set, an equation for male and female patients was developed to predict their normal weight as the sum of the lean body mass and normal fat body mass. The equations were evaluated by predicting the weight of patients in the general medical data set who had a normal BMI (30 kg/m(2)).

Physicians' attitudes towards end-of-life decisions: a comparison between seven countries

In the context of an European collaborative research project (EURELD), a study on attitudes towards medical end-of-life decisions was conducted among physicians in Belgium, Denmark, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden and Switzerland. Australia also joined the consortium. A written questionnaire with structured questions was sent to practising physicians from specialties frequently involved in the care of dying patients. 10,139 questionnaires were studied. Response rate was equal to or larger than 50% in all countries except Italy (39%). Apart from general agreement with respect to the alleviation of pain and symptoms with possible life-shortening effect, there was large variation in support-between and within countries-for medical decision that may result in the hastening of death. A principal component factor analysis found that 58% of the variance of the responses is explained by four factors. 'Country' explained the largest part of the variation of the standardized factor scores. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

TRALI in 2 cases of leukemia

We describe transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) in 2 acute leukemia cases to increase awareness of this under reported serious transfusion complication syndrome in multitransfused patients. There are a number of reports in multitransfused patients with nonmalignant disorders. However, reports of pediatric oncology patients are few, suggesting a lack of recognition or misdiagnosis of the syndrome. A disproportionately high number of fatalities in children is recorded in the literature. This highlights the need for increased awareness and appropriate treatment of this serious complication of transfusion. Although TRALI is initially a clinical diagnosis, the laboratory investigation is vital as it contributes to defining the pathogenesis of the syndrome and importantly facilitates the effective management of implicated donations and donors. An investigational strategy for suspected cases is presented and the results are discussed in the context of current proposed mechanisms for TRALI. As each transfused blood product is associated with a potential risk of TRALI, more frequent reports in patients receiving large volume or recurrent transfusion would be expected.

Qualidade de vida de pacientes oncológicos na freqüência de um grupo de suporte multidisciplinar

As relações sociais e de apoio constituem um fator importante para melhorar a qualidade de vida dos portadores de doenças crônico-degenerativas. Neste contexto, os grupos multidisciplinares de suporte representam uma prática de atenção à saúde que evidenciam um potencial terapêutico e de aprendizagem para os pacientes, familiares e profissionais de saúde. A finalidade deste estudo foi investigar se o grupo de suporte alterou a qualidade de vida 31 de pacientes portadores de câncer. Trata-se de um estudo descritivo-exploratório com abordagem quantitativa, no qual foi utilizado o questionário EORTC-QLQ-C30, específico para mensurar a qualidade de vida de pacientes oncológicos. O EORTC-QLQ-C30 foi utilizado em duas fases: antes da adesão do paciente ao grupo e após quatro meses de participação do paciente nas atividades grupais. A comparação dos resultados das duas fases mostrou aumento dos escores das Funções e da Medida Global de Saúde e Qualidade de Vida, diminuição dos escores das escalas de sintomas, além de alterações não significativas no item Dificuldades Financeiras. Conclui-se que após as atividades grupais, houve melhora da qualidade de vida dos participantes deste estudo, exceto no que se refere à questão financeira.(AU)

CONVICÇÕES DE SAÚDE EM PACIENTES COM CÂNCER

O objetivo deste artigo é tecer algumas reflexões acerca das convicções de saúde em pacientes com câncer, participantes de um programa de atendimento multidisciplinar realizado numa universidade da Grande São Paulo. Foram utilizados depoimentos de 06 (seis) pacientes, na forma de entrevistas dirigidas e o conteúdo analisado segundo um modelo de convicção de saúde, o qual preconiza que o paciente terá maiores possibilidades de aderir aos tratamentos, seguindo cinco convicções básicas de saúde, a saber: suscetibilidade, severidade, benefícios, barreiras, eficácia própria. Uma ampliação deste modelo foi proposta por outro estudo que acrescenta mais duas categorias às já existentes: impacto ao diagnóstico e expectativas de futuro.(AU)

Chemotherapy patient perception regarding communication with the healthcare staff

Purpose: To qualitatively explore the communication between healthcare professionals and oncology patients based on the perception of patients undergoing chemotherapy.Method: Qualitative and exploratory design. Participants were 14 adult patients undergoing chemotherapy at different stages of the disease. A socio-demographic and clinical data form was utilized along with semi-structured interviews. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and content analysis was performed. Two independent judges evaluated the interview content in regards to emerging categories and obtained a Kappa index of 0.834.Results: Three categories emerged from the data: 1) Technical communication without emotional support, in which the information provided is composed of strictly technical information regarding the diagnosis, treatment and/or prognosis; 2) Technical communication, in which the information provided is oriented towards the technical aspects of the patient’s physical condition, while also providing psychological support for the patients’ subjective needs; and 3) Insufficient technical communication, win which there are gaps in the information provided causing confusion and suffering to the patient.Conclusions: Communication with emotional support contributes to greater satisfaction of chemotherapy patients. Practical implications: the results provide elements for the training of healthcare professionals regarding the importance of the emotional support that can be offered to cancer patients during their treatment.

Cancer diagnosis disclosure from Portuguese physicians

OBJECTIVE: Doctor-patient communication in oncology, particularly concerning diagnostic disclosure, is a crucial factor related to the quality of the doctor-patient relationship and the psychological state of the patient. The aims of our study were to investigate physicians' opinions and practice with respect to disclosure of a cancer diagnosis and to explore potential related factors. METHOD: A self-report questionnaire developed for our study was responded to by 120 physicians from Coimbra University Hospital Centre and its primary healthcare units. RESULTS: Some 91.7% of physician respondents generally disclosed a diagnosis, and 94.2% were of the opinion that the patient knowing the truth about a diagnosis had a positive effect on the doctor-patient relationship. A need for training about communicating with oncology patients was reported by 85.8% of participants. The main factors determining what information to provide to patients were: (1) patient intellectual and cultural level, (2) patient desire to know the truth, and (3) the existence of family. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Our results point to a paradigm shift in communication with cancer patients where disclosure of the diagnosis should be made part of general clinical practice. Nevertheless, physicians still experience difficulties in revealing cancer diagnoses to patients and often lack the skills to deal with a patient's emotional responses, which suggests that more attention needs to be focused on communication skills training programs.