La modulation transcriptionnelle du neuropeptide enképhaline par les récepteurs nucléaires Nur77 et RXRγ

Certains neuropeptides (enképhaline et neurotensine) sont des modulateurs du système dopaminergique. Chez les rongeurs, le traitement avec l’antipsychotique typique halopéridol (antagoniste des récepteurs D2), augmente fortement leurs niveaux d’ARNm dans le striatum, une structure centrale du système dopaminergique qui contrôle l’activité locomotrice. Comme l’halopéridol est associé avec de nombreux effets secondaires moteurs, on peut penser que la modulation des neuropeptides est possiblement un mécanisme d’adaptation visant à rétablir l’homéostasie du système dopaminergique après le blocage des récepteurs D2. Cependant, le mécanisme moléculaire de cette régulation transcriptionnelle n’est pas bien compris. Nur77 est un facteur de transcription de la famille des récepteurs nucléaires orphelins qui agit en tant que gène d’induction précoce. Le niveau de son ARNm est aussi fortement augmenté dans le striatum suivant un traitement avec halopéridol. Plusieurs évidences nous suggèrent que Nur77 est impliqué dans la modulation transcriptionnelle des neuropeptides. Nur77 peut former des hétérodimères fonctionnels avec le récepteur rétinoïde X (RXR). En accord avec une activité transcriptionnelle d’un complexe Nur77/RXR, l’agoniste RXR (DHA) réduit tandis que l’antagoniste RXR (HX531) augmente les troubles moteurs induits par un traitement chronique à l’halopéridol chez les souris sauvages tandis que ces ligands pour RXR n’ont aucun effet chez les souris Nur77 nulles. Nos travaux ont révélé que l’antagoniste RXR (HX531) réduit l’augmentation des niveaux d’enképhaline suivant un traitement chronique avec l’halopéridol. Nous avons ensuite démontré la liaison in vitro de Nur77 sur un élément de réponse présent dans le promoteur proximal de la proenképhaline, le peptide précurseur de l’enképhaline. Ces résultats supportent l’hypothèse que Nur77, en combinaison avec RXR, pourrait participer à la régulation transcriptionnelle des neuropeptides dans le striatum et donc contribuer à la neuroadaptation du système dopaminergique suivant un traitement aux antipsychotiques typiques.

Mécanismes cellulaires de l'induction du facteur de transcription Nur77 après un traitement aux antipsychotiques

Les antipsychotiques sont utilisés en clinique depuis plus de 50 ans pour pallier aux symptômes de la schizophrénie. Malgré une recherche intensive, les mécanismes cellulaires et moléculaires responsables de l’effet clinique de cette médication demeurent encore nébuleux. Ces drogues sont reconnues comme des antagonistes des récepteurs D2 de la dopamine et peuvent moduler la transcription génique dans le striatum. Au cours des recherches qui ont mené à l'écriture de cette thèse, nous avons exploré l’expression de Nur77, un facteur de transcription de la famille des récepteurs nucléaires, afin de caractériser le rôle de la dopamine, la sérotonine, l’adénosine et le glutamate dans la régulation génique contrôlée par les antagonistes D2. En premier lieu, nous avons examiné l’impact de la co-administration d’agents sérotonergiques et adrénergiques sur l’expression de l’ARNm de Nur77 induite par l’halopéridol, un antipsychotique de première génération. Nous avons observé que le 8-OH-DPAT et le MDL11939 préviennent partiellement l’induction de Nur77 dans le striatum. Au contraire, l’idazoxan potentialise l’effet de l’halopéridol sur l’expression de Nur77 alors que le prazosin reste sans effet. Ces résultats démontrent que l’expression striatale de Nur77 induite par l’halopéridol peut être modulée à la baisse avec un agoniste 5-HT1A ou un antagoniste 5-HT2A. Par la suite, nous avons évalué dans divers paradigmes expérimentaux l’effet de l’éticlopride, un antagoniste spécifique D2, afin d’explorer davantage le mécanisme de l’effet transcriptionnel des antagonistes D2. Étonnamment, la suppression de l’isoforme D2L chez la souris D2L KO ne réduit pas la réponse de l’éticlopride dans le striatum. Par contre, une lésion corticale avec l’acide iboténique bloque l’effet de l’éticlopride sur la transcription de Nur77, suggérant un rôle du glutamate. La combinaison d’un antagoniste des récepteurs métabotropes du glutamate de types 5 (mGluR5) et d’un antagoniste des récepteurs de l’adénosine A2A abolit complètement l’augmentation de la transcription de Nur77 induit par l’éticlopride dans le striatum. La modulation directe de l’expression striatale de Nur77 par les récepteurs mGluR5 et A2A a été confirmée dans un modèle de cultures organotypiques de tranches cérébrales. Ces résultats démontrent clairement que la modulation de l’expression génique dans le striatum, à la suite d’un traitement avec un antagoniste D2 pourrait être indépendante d’une interaction directe avec les récepteurs D2 post-synaptiques, et reposerait plutôt sur son interaction avec les récepteurs D2 hétérosynaptiques des afférences corticostriées et l’activation subséquente des récepteurs post-synaptiques du glutamate et de l’adénosine. En résumé, nos résultats suggèrent que l’interaction des antipsychotiques atypiques avec les récepteurs 5-HT2A et 5-HT1A pourrait expliquer la différence dans le patron d’expression génique induit par ces drogues en comparaison avec les antipsychotiques typiques. De plus, nos résultats révèlent un nouveau mécanisme d’action des antagonistes D2 et supportent un rôle primordial du glutamate et de l’adénosine dans les effets des antipsychotiques de première génération.

Cloning and characterization of a corepressor and potential component of the nuclear hormone receptor repression complex

Nuclear hormone receptors are potent repressors of transcription in the unliganded state. We describe here the cloning of a nuclear receptor corepressor that we call SUN-CoR (Small Unique Nuclear receptor CoRepressor), which shows no homology to previously described nuclear hormone receptor corepressors, N-CoR, or SMRT. SUN-CoR is a highly basic, 16-kDa nuclear protein that is expressed at high levels in adult tissues and is induced during adipocyte and myogenic differentiation. SUN-CoR potentiates transcriptional repression by thyroid hormone receptor and RevErb in vivo, represses transcription when fused to a heterologous DNA binding domain, and interacts with RevErb as well as with thyroid hormone receptor in vitro. SUN-CoR also interacts with N-CoR and SMRT in vitro and with endogenous N-CoR in cells. We conclude that SUN-CoR is a corepressor and may function as an additional component of the complex involved in transcriptional repression by unliganded and orphan nuclear hormone receptors.

Activation of Androgen Receptor Function by a Novel Nuclear Protein Kinase

Androgen receptor (AR) belongs to the nuclear receptor superfamily and mediates the biological actions of male sex steroids. In this work, we have characterized a novel 130-kDa Ser/Thr protein kinase ANPK that interacts with the zinc finger region of AR in vivo and in vitro. The catalytic kinase domain of ANPK shares considerable sequence similarity with the minibrain gene product, a protein kinase suggested to contribute to learning defects associated with Down syndrome. However, the rest of ANPK sequence, including the AR-interacting interface, exhibits no apparent homology with other proteins. ANPK is a nuclear protein that is widely expressed in mammalian tissues. Its overexpression enhances AR-dependent transcription in various cell lines. In addition to the zinc finger region, ligand-binding domain and activation function AF1 of AR are needed, as the activity of AR mutants devoid of these domains was not influenced by ANPK. The receptor protein does not appear to be a substrate for ANPK in vitro, and overexpression of ANPK does not increase the extent of AR phosphorylation in vivo. In view of this, it is likely that ANPK-mediated activation of AR function is exerted through modification of AR-associated proteins, such as coregulatory factors, and/or through stabilization of the receptor protein against degradation.

Analysis of estrogen receptor transcriptional enhancement by a nuclear hormone receptor coactivator.

The estrogen receptor (ER), a member of a large superfamily of nuclear hormone receptors, is a ligand-inducible transcription factor that regulates the expression of estrogen-responsive genes. The ER, in common with other members of this superfamily, contains two transcription activation functions (AFs)--one located in the amino-terminal region (AF-1) and the second located in the carboxyl-terminal region (AF-2). In most cell contexts, the synergistic activity of AF-1 and AF-2 is required for full estradiol (E2)-stimulated activity. We have previously shown that a ligand-dependent interaction between the two AF-containing regions of ER was promoted by E2 and the antiestrogen trans-hydroxytamoxifen (TOT). This interaction, however, was transcriptionally productive only in the presence of E2. To explore a possible role of steroid receptor coactivators in transcriptional synergism between AF-1 and AF-2, we expressed the amino terminal (AF-1-containing) and carboxyl-terminal (AF-2-containing) regions of ER as separate polypeptides in mammalian cells, along with the steroid receptor coactivator-1 protein (SRC-1). We demonstrate that SRC-1, which has been shown to significantly increase ER transcriptional activity, enhanced the interaction, mediated by either E2 or TOT, between the AF-1-containing and AF-2-containing regions of the ER. However, this enhanced interaction resulted in increased transcriptional effectiveness only with E2 and not with TOT, consistent with the effects of SRC-1 on the full-length receptor. Our results suggest that after ligand binding, SRC-1 may act, in part, as an adapter protein that promotes the integration of amino- and carboxyl-terminal receptor functions, allowing for full receptor activation. Potentially, SRC-1 may be capable of enhancing the transcriptional activity of related nuclear receptor superfamily members by facilitating the productive association of the two AF-containing regions in these receptors.

Drosophila hormone receptor 38: a second partner for Drosophila USP suggests an unexpected role for nuclear receptors of the nerve growth factor-induced protein B type.

In Drosophila the response to the hormone ecdysone is mediated in part by Ultraspiracle (USP) and ecdysone receptor (EcR), which are members of the nuclear receptor superfamily. Heterodimers of these proteins bind to ecdysone response elements (EcREs) and ecdysone to modulate transcription. Herein we describe Drosophila hormone receptor 38 (DHR38) and Bombyx hormone receptor 38 (BHR38), two insect homologues of rat nerve growth factor-induced protein B (NGFI-B). Although members of the NGFI-B family are thought to function exclusively as monomers, we show that DHR38 and BHR38 in fact interact strongly with USP and that this interaction is evolutionarily conserved. DHR38 can compete in vitro against EcR for dimerization with USP and consequently disrupt EcR-USP binding to an EcRE. Moreover, transfection experiments in Schneider cells show that DHR38 can affect ecdysone-dependent transcription. This suggests that DHR38 plays a role in the ecdysone response and that more generally NGFI-B type receptors may be able to function as heterodimers with retinoid X receptor type receptors in regulating transcription.

Caractérisation de l’activité Nur77 et de ses complexes en essais BRET par complémentation

Dans le système nerveux central, la dopamine joue un rôle crucial dans de nombreuses fonctions physiologiques telles que : l’apprentissage, le mouvement volontaire, la motivation, la cognition et la production hormonale. Il a été aussi démontré que le système de signalisation dopaminergique est altéré dans plusieurs maladies neurologiques et psychiatriques comme la maladie de Parkinson et la schizophrénie. Des études, effectuées dans le laboratoire du Dr.Daniel Lévesque (laboratoire d’accueil), ont montré que les récepteurs nucléaires Nur77 (NR4A1, NGFI-B) et RXRγ (retinoid X receptors γ) sont impliqués dans la régulation des effets de la dopamine dans le système nerveux central. De plus, ces données suggèrent que le complexe Nur77 et RXR joueraient un rôle crucial dans l’effet des médicaments antipsychotiques et antiparkinsoniens. Toutefois, très peu de médicaments ciblant Nur77 ont été identifiés à ce jour et les médicaments agissant sur RXRγ restent mal caractérisés. En outre, les analyses actuellement disponibles ne peuvent pas résumer la complexité des activités des NRs et génèrent des mesures indirectes des activités des drogues. Afin de mieux comprendre comment est régulée l’interaction Nur77/RXRγ dans ces processus, mon projet a été de mettre au point un essai BRET (Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer) et PCA-BRET (Protein Complementation Assay-BRET) basé sur le recrutement d'un motif mimant un co-activateur fusionné avec la YFP. Nos différents essais ont été validés par courbes dose-réponse en utilisant différents composés RXR . Les EC50 (concentration efficace médiane, qui permet de mesurer l'efficacité d'un composé) obtenues étaient très semblables aux valeurs précédemment rapportées dans la littérature. Nous avons aussi pu identifier un composé le SR11237 (BMS649) qui semble posséder une sélectivité pour le complexe Nur77/RXRγ par rapport aux complexes Nurr1/RXRγ et RXRγ /RXRγ. Nos résultats indiquent que ces essais de BRET peuvent être utilisés pour évaluer la sélectivité de nouveaux composés pour les complexes Nur77/RXRγ, Nurr1/RXRγ et RXRγ /RXRγ. Un autre aspect de mon projet de doctorat a été de mettre en évidence par BRET l’importance de la SUMOylation dans la régulation de l'activité de Nur77 dans sa forme monomèrique, homodimèrique et hétérodimèrique. Nous avons ainsi identifié que Nur77 recrute principalement SUMO2 sur sa lysine 577. Il est intéressant de noté que le recrutement de la SUMO2 à Nur77 est potentialisé en présence de la SUMO E3 Ligase PIASγ. Aussi, la perte de la SUMOylation sur la lysine 577 entraîne l'incapacité de Nur77 de recruter divers motifs de co-activation mais pas pour ses formes homo- et hétérodimèrique. Cependant, la présence de PIASγ ne potentialise pas le recrutement du co-activateur, suggérant que cette SUMO E3 Ligase est seulement impliqué dans le processus de recrutement de la SUMO mais pas dans celui du co-activateur. Nous avons ainsi déterminé une nouvelle modification post-traductionnelle sur Nur77 régulant spécifiquement son activité monomérique Ces projets pourraient donc apporter de nouvelles données cruciales pour l’amélioration du traitement de la maladie de Parkinson ou de la schizophrénie, ainsi que d'obtenir une meilleure compréhension sur les mécanismes permettant la régulation de la fonction de Nur77

Caractérisation de l’activité Nur77 et de ses complexes en essais BRET par complémentation

Dans le système nerveux central, la dopamine joue un rôle crucial dans de nombreuses fonctions physiologiques telles que : l’apprentissage, le mouvement volontaire, la motivation, la cognition et la production hormonale. Il a été aussi démontré que le système de signalisation dopaminergique est altéré dans plusieurs maladies neurologiques et psychiatriques comme la maladie de Parkinson et la schizophrénie. Des études, effectuées dans le laboratoire du Dr.Daniel Lévesque (laboratoire d’accueil), ont montré que les récepteurs nucléaires Nur77 (NR4A1, NGFI-B) et RXRγ (retinoid X receptors γ) sont impliqués dans la régulation des effets de la dopamine dans le système nerveux central. De plus, ces données suggèrent que le complexe Nur77 et RXR joueraient un rôle crucial dans l’effet des médicaments antipsychotiques et antiparkinsoniens. Toutefois, très peu de médicaments ciblant Nur77 ont été identifiés à ce jour et les médicaments agissant sur RXRγ restent mal caractérisés. En outre, les analyses actuellement disponibles ne peuvent pas résumer la complexité des activités des NRs et génèrent des mesures indirectes des activités des drogues. Afin de mieux comprendre comment est régulée l’interaction Nur77/RXRγ dans ces processus, mon projet a été de mettre au point un essai BRET (Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer) et PCA-BRET (Protein Complementation Assay-BRET) basé sur le recrutement d'un motif mimant un co-activateur fusionné avec la YFP. Nos différents essais ont été validés par courbes dose-réponse en utilisant différents composés RXR . Les EC50 (concentration efficace médiane, qui permet de mesurer l'efficacité d'un composé) obtenues étaient très semblables aux valeurs précédemment rapportées dans la littérature. Nous avons aussi pu identifier un composé le SR11237 (BMS649) qui semble posséder une sélectivité pour le complexe Nur77/RXRγ par rapport aux complexes Nurr1/RXRγ et RXRγ /RXRγ. Nos résultats indiquent que ces essais de BRET peuvent être utilisés pour évaluer la sélectivité de nouveaux composés pour les complexes Nur77/RXRγ, Nurr1/RXRγ et RXRγ /RXRγ. Un autre aspect de mon projet de doctorat a été de mettre en évidence par BRET l’importance de la SUMOylation dans la régulation de l'activité de Nur77 dans sa forme monomèrique, homodimèrique et hétérodimèrique. Nous avons ainsi identifié que Nur77 recrute principalement SUMO2 sur sa lysine 577. Il est intéressant de noté que le recrutement de la SUMO2 à Nur77 est potentialisé en présence de la SUMO E3 Ligase PIASγ. Aussi, la perte de la SUMOylation sur la lysine 577 entraîne l'incapacité de Nur77 de recruter divers motifs de co-activation mais pas pour ses formes homo- et hétérodimèrique. Cependant, la présence de PIASγ ne potentialise pas le recrutement du co-activateur, suggérant que cette SUMO E3 Ligase est seulement impliqué dans le processus de recrutement de la SUMO mais pas dans celui du co-activateur. Nous avons ainsi déterminé une nouvelle modification post-traductionnelle sur Nur77 régulant spécifiquement son activité monomérique Ces projets pourraient donc apporter de nouvelles données cruciales pour l’amélioration du traitement de la maladie de Parkinson ou de la schizophrénie, ainsi que d'obtenir une meilleure compréhension sur les mécanismes permettant la régulation de la fonction de Nur77

The contribution of different androgen receptor domains to receptor dimerization and signaling

The androgen receptor (AR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor of the nuclear receptor superfamily that plays a critical role in male physiology and pathology. Activated by binding of the native androgens testosterone and 5-dihydrotestosterone, the AR regulates transcription of genes involved in the development and maintenance of male phenotype and male reproductive function as well as other tissues such as bone and muscle. Deregulation of AR signaling can cause a diverse range of clinical conditions, including the X-linked androgen insensitivity syndrome, a form of motor neuron disease known as Kennedy’s disease, and male infertility. In addition, there is now compelling evidence that the AR is involved in all stages of prostate tumorigenesis including initiation, progression, and treatment resistance. To better understand the role of AR signaling in the pathogenesis of these conditions, it is important to have a comprehensive understanding of the key determinants of AR structure and function. Binding of androgens to the AR induces receptor dimerization, facilitating DNA binding and the recruitment of cofactors and transcriptional machinery to regulate expression of target genes. Various models of dimerization have been described for the AR, the most well characterized interaction being DNA-binding domain- mediated dimerization, which is essential for the AR to bind DNA and regulate transcription. Additional AR interactions with potential to contribute to receptor dimerization include the intermolecular interaction between the AR amino terminal domain and ligand-binding domain known as the N-terminal/C-terminal interaction, and ligand-binding domain dimerization. In this review, we discuss each form of dimerization utilized by the AR to achieve transcriptional competence and highlight that dimerization through multiple domains is necessary for optimal AR signaling.

Receptor-DNA interactions: EMSA and footprinting

Defining the precise promoter DNA sequence motifs where nuclear receptors and other transcription factors bind is an essential prerequisite for understanding how these proteins modulate the expression of their specific target genes. The purpose of this chapter is to provide the reader with a detailed guide with respect to the materials and the key methods required to perform this type of DNA-binding analysis. Irrespective of whether starting with purified DNA-binding proteins or somewhat crude cellular extracts, the tried-and-true procedures described here will enable one to accurately access the capacity of specific proteins to bind to DNA as well as to determine the exact sequences and DNA contact nucleotides involved. For illustrative purposes, we primarily have used the interaction of the androgen receptor with the rat probasin proximal promoter as our model system.

Progesterone, glucocorticoid, but not estrogen receptor mRNA is altered in breast cancer stroma

Our laboratory has previously found that anti-mitogenic nuclear receptor mRNA is elevated in late stage tumours and this study was performed to scrutinize the possibility of cancer-stroma crosstalk using hormone signaling in these tissues. RNA levels in stromal tissue were examined for the estrogen α, estrogen β, androgen, progesterone and glucocorticoid nuclear receptors by a semi-quantitative PCR. Significant differences in expression between the cancer stroma and control tissue were seen, analyzing for both cancer grade and estrogen receptor status. Stroma and control tissue were significantly different for the progesterone and glucocorticoid nuclear receptors (p = 5.908 × 10−7 and 2.761 × 10−5, respectively). Glucocorticoid receptor also showed a significant increase to mRNA levels in the stroma of estrogen receptor negative tumours (p = 5.85 × 10−5). By contrast, the estrogen receptors α and β, those most closely associated with breast tissue growth, showed no significant change in mRNA (p = 0.372 and 0.655, respectively). Androgen receptor mRNA also remained unaffected (p = 0.174).

Androgen receptor in transcriptional regulation and carcinogenesis

Androgens control a variety of developmental processes that create the male phenotype and are important for maintaining male fertility and normal functions of tissues and organs that are not directly involved in procreation. Androgen receptor (AR) that mediates the biological actions of androgens is a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily of ligand-inducible transcription factors. Although AR was cloned over 15 years ago, the mechanisms by which it regulates gene expression are not well understood. A growing body of in vitro experimental evidence suggests that a complex network of proteins is involved in the androgen-dependent transcriptional regulation. However, the process of AR-dependent transcriptional regulation under physiological conditions is largely elusive. In the present study, a series of experiments were performed, including quantitative chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays, to investigate AR-mediated transcription process using living prostate cancer cells. Our results show that the loading of AR and recruitment of coactivators and RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to both the promoter and enhancer of AR target genes are a transient and cyclic event that in addition to hyperacetylation, also involves dynamic changes in methylation, phosphorylation of core histone H3 in androgen-treated LNCaP cells. The dynamics of testosterone (T)-induced loading of AR onto the proximal promoters of the genes clearly differed from that loaded onto the distal enhancers. Significantly, more holo-AR was loaded onto the enhancers than the promoters, but the principal Pol II transcription complex was assembled on the promoters. By contrast, the pure antiandrogen bicalutamide (CDX) complexed to AR elicited occupancy of the PSA promoter, but was unable to load onto the PSA enhancer and was incapable of recruiting Pol II, coactivators and following changes of covalent histone modifications. The partial antagonist cyproterone acetate (CPA) and mifepristone (RU486) were capable of promoting AR loading onto both the PSA promoter and enhancer at a comparable efficiency with androgen in LNCaP cells expressing mutant AR. However, CPA- and RU486-bound AR not only recruited Pol II and coactivator p300 and GRIP1 onto the promoter and enhancer, but also recruited the corepressor NCoR onto the promoter as efficiently as CDX. In addition, we demonstrate that both proteasome and protein kinases are implicated in AR-mediated transcription. Even though proteasome inhibitor MG132 and protein kinase inhibitor DRB (5, 6-Dichlorobenzimidazole riboside) can block ligand-dependent accumulation of PSA mRNA with same efficiency, their use results in different molecular profiles in terms of the formation of AR-mediated transcriptional complex. Collectively, these results indicate that transcriptional activation by AR is a complicated process, which includes transient loading of holo-AR and recruitment of Pol II and coregulators accompanied by a cascade of distinct covalent histone modifications; This process involves both the promoter and enhancer elements, as well as other general components of the cell machineries e.g. proteasome and protein kinase; The pure antiandrogen CDX and the partial antagonist CPA and RU486 exhibit clearly different profiles in terms of their ability to induce the formation of AR-dependent transcriptional complexes and the histone modifications associated with the target genes in human prostate cancer cells. Finally, by using quantitative RT-PCR to compare the expression of sixteen AR co-regulators in prostate cancer cell lines, xenografts, and clinical prostate cancer specimens we suggest that AR co-regulators protein inhibitor of activated STAT1 (PIAS1) and steroid receptor coactivator 1(SRC1) could be involved in the progression of prostate cancer.

Molecular Mechanisms of Androgen Receptor Interactions

The androgen receptor (AR) mediates the effects of the male sex-steroid hormones (androgens), testosterone and 5?-dihydrotestosterone. Androgens are critical in the development and maintenance of male sexual characteristics. AR is a member of the steroid receptor ligand-inducible transcription factor family. The steroid receptor family is a subgroup of the nuclear receptor superfamily that also includes receptors for the active forms of vitamin A, vitamin D3, and thyroid hormones. Like all nuclear receptors, AR has a conserved modular structure consisting of a non-conserved amino-terminal domain (NTD), containing the intrinsic activation function 1, a highly conserved DNA-binding domain, and a conserved ligand-binding domain (LBD) that harbors the activation function 2. Each of these domains plays an important role in receptor function and signaling, either via intra- and inter-receptor interactions, interactions with specific DNA sequences, termed hormone response elements, or via functional interactions with domain-specific proteins, termed coregulators (coactivators and corepressors). Upon binding androgens, AR acquires a new conformational state, translocates to the nucleus, binds to androgen response elements, homodimerizes and recruits sequence-specific coregulatory factors and the basal transcription machinery. This set of events is required to activate gene transcription (expression). Gene transcription is a strictly modulated process that governs cell growth, cell homeostasis, cell function and cell death. Disruptions of AR transcriptional activity caused by receptor mutations and/or altered coregulator interactions are linked to a wide spectrum of androgen insensitivity syndromes, and to the pathogenesis of prostate cancer (CaP). The treatment of CaP usually involves androgen depletion therapy (ADT). ADT achieves significant clinical responses during the early stages of the disease. However, under the selective pressure of androgen withdrawal, androgen-dependent CaP can progress to an androgen-independent CaP. Androgen-independent CaP is invariably a more aggressive and untreatable form of the disease. Advancing our understanding of the molecular mechanisms behind the switch in androgen-dependency would improve our success of treating CaP and other AR related illnesses. This study evaluates how clinically identified AR mutations affect the receptor s transcriptional activity. We reveal that a potential molecular abnormality in androgen insensitivity syndrome and CaP patients is caused by disruptions of the important intra-receptor NTD/LBD interaction. We demonstrate that the same AR LBD mutations can also disrupt the recruitment of the p160 coactivator protein GRIP1. Our investigations reveal that 30% of patients with advanced, untreated local CaP have somatic mutations that may lead to increases in AR activity. We report that somatic mutations that activate AR may lead to early relapse in ADT. Our results demonstrate that the types of ADT a CaP patient receives may cause a clustering of mutations to a particular region of the receptor. Furthermore, the mutations that arise before and during ADT do not always result in a receptor that is more active, indicating that coregulator interactions play a pivotal role in the progression of androgen-independent CaP. To improve CaP therapy, it is necessary to identify critical coregulators of AR. We screened a HeLa cell cDNA library and identified small carboxyl-terminal domain phosphatase 2 (SCP2). SCP2 is a protein phosphatase that directly interacts with the AR NTD and represses AR activity. We demonstrated that reducing the endogenous cellular levels of SCP2 causes more AR to load on to the prostate specific antigen (PSA) gene promoter and enhancer regions. Additionally, under the same conditions, more RNA polymerase II was recruited to the PSA promoter region and overall there was an increase in androgen-dependent transcription of the PSA gene, revealing that SCP2 could play a role in the pathogenesis of CaP.

The role of the IL-1 type 1 receptor in the life, death and differentiation of adult hippocampal neural precursor cells

Neurogenesis occurs in two distinct regions of the adult brain; the subgranular zone (SGZ) of the dentate gyrus (DG) in the hippocampus, and the subventricular zone (SVZ) lining the lateral ventricles. It is now well-known that adult hippocampal neurogenesis can be modulated by a number of intrinsic and extrinsic factors e.g. local signalling molecules, exercise, environmental enrichment and learning. Moreover, levels of adult hippocampal neurogenesis decrease with age, at least in rodents, and alterations in hippocampal neurogenesis have been reported in animal models and human studies of neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative conditions. Neuroinflammation is a common pathological feature of these conditions and is also a potent modulator of adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Recently, the orphan nuclear receptor TLX has been identified as an important regulator of adult hippocampal neurogenesis as its expression is necessary to maintain the neural precursor cell (NPC) pool in the adult DG. Likewise, exposure of animals to voluntary exercise has been consistently demonstrated to promote adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Lentivirus (LV)- mediated gene transfer is a useful tool to elucidate gene function and to explore potential therapeutic candidates across an array of conditions as it facilitates sustained gene expression in both dividing and post-mitotic cell populations. Both intrinsic and extrinsic factors are important regulators of adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Examining how these factors are affected by an inflammatory stimulus, and the subsequent effects on adult hippocampal neurogenesis provides important information for the development of novel treatment strategies for neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative conditions in which adult hippocampal neurogenesis is impaired. The aims of the series of experiments presented in this thesis were to examine the effect of the pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-1β (IL-1β) on adult hippocampal NPCs both in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, we have shown that IL-1β reduces proliferation of adult hippocampal NPCs in a dose and time-dependent manner. In addition, we have demonstrated that TLX expression is reduced by IL-1β. Blockade of IL-1β signalling prevented both the IL-1β-induced reduction in cell proliferation and TLX expression. In vivo, we examined the effect of short term and long term exposure to LV-IL-1β in sedentary mice and in mice exposed to voluntary running. We demonstrated that impaired hippocampal neurogenesis is only evident after long term exposure to IL-1β. In mice exposed to voluntary running, hippocampal neurogenesis is significantly increased following short-term but not long-term exposure to running. Moreover, short-term running effectively prevents any IL-1β-induced effects on hippocampal neurogenesis; however, no such effects are seen following long-term exposure to running.

Prolactin receptor signaling is essential for perinatal brown adipocyte function: a role for insulin-like growth factor-2.

BACKGROUND: The lactogenic hormones prolactin (PRL) and placental lactogens (PL) play central roles in reproduction and mammary development. Their actions are mediated via binding to PRL receptor (PRLR), highly expressed in brown adipose tissue (BAT), yet their impact on adipocyte function and metabolism remains unclear. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: PRLR knockout (KO) newborn mice were phenotypically characterized in terms of thermoregulation and their BAT differentiation assayed for gene expression studies. Derived brown preadipocyte cell lines were established to evaluate the molecular mechanisms involved in PRL signaling on BAT function. Here, we report that newborn mice lacking PRLR have hypotrophic BAT depots that express low levels of adipocyte nuclear receptor PPARgamma2, its coactivator PGC-1alpha, uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) and the beta3 adrenoceptor, reducing mouse viability during cold challenge. Immortalized PRLR KO preadipocytes fail to undergo differentiation into mature adipocytes, a defect reversed by reintroduction of PRLR. That the effects of the lactogens in BAT are at least partly mediated by Insulin-like Growth Factor-2 (IGF-2) is supported by: i) a striking reduction in BAT IGF-2 expression in PRLR KO mice and in PRLR-deficient preadipocytes; ii) induction of cellular IGF-2 expression by PRL through JAK2/STAT5 pathway activation; and iii) reversal of defective differentiation in PRLR KO cells by exogenous IGF-2. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that the lactogens act in concert with IGF-2 to control brown adipocyte differentiation and growth. Given the prominent role of brown adipose tissue during the perinatal period, our results identified prolactin receptor signaling as a major player and a potential therapeutic target in protecting newborn mammals against hypothermia.