Opinion of the Attorney General of the United States: Importation of meats and animals that have transited countries infected with foot-and-mouth disease or rinderpest.

Mode of access: Internet.

The epizootic of foot and mouth disease in California, February 17, 1924 to June 10, 1926 /

Mode of access: Internet.

Bibliography of foot-and-mouth disease in man, 1695-1965 /

Kept up to date by supplements.

Control of foot-and-mouth disease. Report of special subcommittee to the Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate, on study of pernicious effect of foot-and-mouth disease as it exists in Mexico and elsewhere, progress of program to prevent entry of the disease into the United States, the most effective methods of combating and controlling the disease and the proper location for the authorized research facilities.

Kenneth S. Wherry, chairman of subcommittee.

Report of the departmental committee on foot-and-mouth disease appointed by the minister of agriculture and fisheries. 1914.

Ernest G. Pretyman, chairman.

House joint resolution 154. Hearings before the subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations House of Representatives, Eightieth Congress, first congress, first session, on H. J. Res. 154 ... Control and eradication of foot-and-mouth disease and rinderpest ...

John Taber, chairman.

A study of the potential economic impact of foot-and-mouth disease in the United States /

Issued May 1979.

The 1929 outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease in southern California /

Caption title.

Instructions for employees engaged in eradicating foot-and-mouth disease.

At head of title: U.S. Department of agriculture. Bureau of animal industry.

Report on developments in the campaign for the eradication of foot-and-mouth disease in Mexico.

Title changes: 1947-48: Summary of developments in the Mexican outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease.

Report of the departmental committee appointed by the Minister of Agriculture and Fisheries to consider the outbreak of foot and mouth disease wich occurred in 1923-24 ...

Ernest G. Pretyman, chairman.

Potential economic implications for regional tourism of a Foot and Mouth Disease outbreak in North Queensland

International and domestic tourism are sensitive to disastrous events which make areas inaccessible to visitors, less attractive or more dangerous. One form of tourism disaster is the outbreak of an exotic disease, of which Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) is a prime case. It is now well documented that the 2001 FMD outbreak in the UK had a greater impact on tourism than on agriculture. It has been estimated than an FMD outbreak in Australia would impose a cost of about $13 million. The impact on tourism would be highly dependent on the extent and duration of an FMD outbreak, as well as on any management and containment restrictions imposed by the authorities in their attempt to control and eventually eradicate the disease. Public perception and thus the provision of accurate information and the way in which the media report disasters will also play an important role in determining the impact on the tourism industry. The economy of Tropical North Queensland relies heavily on international visitors, and an FMD outbreak in the region would impose a large cost to the regional economy, conservatively estimated here to be of the order of $200 million per year.

Local-authority led economic regeneration strategies in the aftermath of the Foot-and-Mouth Disease crisis of 2001

The Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD) outbreak of 2001 in the UK was completely unprecedented in its scale and severity, with over four million animals culled and a cost to the Exchequer of over £4 billion. Local authorities were at the front line in dealing with the outbreak, in coordinating the cull of livestock, the disposal of carcasses as well as attempting to deal with its aftermath and, in particular, the impact on the wider rural economy. This article examines the impacts of this crisis on three local authorities, Devon, Herefordshire and Cumbria. It examines how far the crisis acted as a catalyst in developing strategies to deal with a future outbreak as well as new local initiatives to promote regeneration in the areas most adversely affected. It focuses on developments that can be directly attributed to the crisis and shows that FMD had a considerable impact on communications and 'joined-up' activity within local authorities and with local stakeholders. © 2006, LEPU, South Bank University.

Policy on the hoof:the handling of the foot and mouth disease outbreak in 2001

The foot and mouth disease (FMD) epidemic of 2001 was a disaster for sections of the agricultural industry, a number of businesses and for the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF), which met its demise as a government department during the crisis, being replaced by the Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). There were some 2,030 confirmed cases and over four million animals slaughtered. It caused the postponement of local elections and of a general election. From a public policy perspective it raised questions about contingency planning, the adjustment of policy to take account of change and how to manage a crisis. This article focuses on the background to the crisis and how it was handled.

Phylodynamic modelling of foot-and-mouth disease virus sequence data

The under-reporting of cases of infectious diseases is a substantial impediment to the control and management of infectious diseases in both epidemic and endemic contexts. Information about infectious disease dynamics can be recovered from sequence data using time-varying coalescent approaches, and phylodynamic models have been developed in order to reconstruct demographic changes of the numbers of infected hosts through time. In this study I have demonstrated the general concordance between empirically observed epidemiological incidence data and viral demography inferred through analysis of foot-and-mouth disease virus VP1 coding sequences belonging to the CATHAY topotype over large temporal and spatial scales. However a more precise and robust relationship between the effective population size (