Konstruktion und erste Validierung eines Fragebogens zur umfassenden Erfassung von Achtsamkeit: Das Comprehensive Inventory of Mindfulness Experiences

In der vorliegenden Arbeit werden Entwicklung und Validierung eines Fragebogens zur umfassenden Erfassung der Achtsamkeit, des Comprehensive Inventory of Mindfulness Experiences (CHIME), beschrieben. An einer Allgemeinbevölkerungs-Stichprobe (N = 298) und einer Stichprobe von TeilnehmerInnen an MBSR-Kursen (N = 161) wurde die Faktorenstruktur des CHIME ermittelt und seine Reliabilität und Validität geprüft. Faktorenanalytische Verfahren ergaben eine achtfaktorielle Struktur. Die Struktur wurde in einer zusätzlichen konfirmatorischen Stichprobe (N = 202) überprüft. Der Fragebogen sowie seine Unterskalen weisen gute Reliabilitätswerte auf (interne Konsistenz und Retest-Reliabilität). Analysen zur Messinvarianz der einzelnen Items über Gruppen, die sich bezüglich Meditationserfahrung, Alter, Geschlecht und Symptombelastung unterschieden, zeigten keine systematischen Unterschiede im Verständnis der Items. Die Kennwerte zur Konstrukt-, Kriterium-, und inkrementellen Validität sowie zur Veränderungssensitivität waren alle mindestens zufriedenstellend. Mit dem CHIME steht somit ein Fragebogen mit guten psychometrischen Eigenschaften zur Selbsteinschätzung der Achtsamkeit zur Verfügung. Der CHIME basiert auf allen in den aktuellen Instrumenten enthaltenen Aspekten des Achtsamkeitskonstrukts.

The potential of a mindfulness-enhanced, integrative neuropsychotherapy program for treating fatigue following stroke: A preliminary Study

Fatigue is a frequently reported symptom after a stroke. Although the phenomenology of poststroke fatigue is well known, clear definitions as well as diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines are missing. Poststroke fatigue can be regarded as a multidimensional phenomenon that might be influenced by neurological, physical, psychological, and cognitive factors. It can range from mild to severe and can affect every area of the activities of daily life. The objective of our preliminary study was to outline aspects of a specific treatment program for the management of poststroke fatigue. Eight patients were recruited for a mindfulness-enhanced, integrative neuropsychotherapy program. The treatment was a combination of neuropsychological interventions, psychoeducation, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and mindfulness techniques. The main treatment foci were (a) to facilitate an increased awareness of fatigue symptoms, (b) to help the patient detect and manage triggers of fatigue, and (c) to equip the patient with multiple self-help tools. Measures were assessed at the beginning, during, and at the end of treatment using self-assessment questionnaire for mental fatigue and related symptoms after neurological disorders and injuries. Significant pre- to post-assessment differences were observed. These findings suggest that patients may benefit from a specific treatment program in order to better adapt to poststroke fatigue. These findings encourage further investigation of this integrative treatment in larger samples that include adequate control treatments.

Die umfassende Erfassung von Achtsamkeit zur Erforschung achtsamkeitsbasierter Interventionen bei psychischen Störungen – Das Comprehensive Inventory of Mindfulness Experiences (CHIME)

Einleitung: Achtsamkeitsbasierte psychotherapeutische Interventionen haben sich in den letzten Jahren als wirksame Methoden bei der Behandlung unterschiedlichen psychischen Störungen etabliert. So konnte z.B. die Achtsamkeitsbasierte Kognitive Therapie der Depression (Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy, MBCT) in kontrollierten Studien eine Halbierung der Rückfallraten bei rezidivierenden Depressionen erreichen. Auch die Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) erwies sich in einem weiteren Bereich von Störungen als wirksam. Zur Evaluation und weiteren Entwicklung achtsamkeitsbasierter Interventionen ist eine umfassende und differenzierte Erfassung der Trait-Achtsamkeit und ihrer Veränderung im Rahmen der Behandlung von vorrangiger Bedeutung. Die bisher vorliegenden Instrumente konnte diese Anforderungen nur teilwiese erfüllen. Methode: Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden Entwicklung und Validierung eines Fragebogens zur umfassenden Erfassung der Achtsamkeit, des Comprehensive Inventory of Mindfulness Experiences (CHIME, Bergomi, Tschacher & Kupper, 2014), beschrieben. An einer Allgemeinbevölkerungs-Stichprobe (N=298) und einer Stichprobe von TeilnehmerInnen an MBSR-Gruppen (N=161) wurde die Faktorenstruktur des CHIME ermittelt und seine Reliabilität und Validität geprüft. Ergebnisse: Faktorenanalytische Verfahren ergaben eine achtfaktorielle Struktur. Der Fragebogen sowie seine Unterskalen weisen gute Reliabilitätswerte auf (interne Konsistenz und Retest-Reliabilität). Analysen zur Messinvarianz der einzelnen Items über Gruppen, die sich bezüglich Meditationserfahrung, Alter, Geschlecht und Symptombelastung unterschieden, zeigten keine systematischen Unterschiede im Verständnis der Items. Die Kennwerte zur Konstrukt-, Kriterium-, und inkrementellen Validität sowie zurVeränderungssensitivität waren alle mindestens zufriedenstellend. Mit dem CHIME steht somit ein Fragebogen mit guten psychometrischen Eigenschaften zur Selbsteinschätzung der Achtsamkeit zur Verfügung. Der CHIME basiert auf alle in den aktuellen Instrumenten enthaltenen Aspekte des Achtsamkeitskonstrukts und kann die Evaluation und weitere Entwicklung von achtsamkeitsbasierten Interventionen bei psychischen Störungen unterstützen. Referenz: Bergomi, C., Tschacher, W. & Kupper, Z. (2014). Konstruktion und erste Validierung eines Fragebogens zur umfassenden Erfassung von Achtsamkeit: Das Comprehensive Inventory of Mindfulness Experiences. Diagnostica. 60 (3) 111-125.

Construction and first validation of the comprehensive inventory of mindfulness (CHIME)

Introduction: Measuring trait mindfulness and change in mindfulness may be a crucial prerequisite for the evaluation and further development of mindfulness based interventions for the treatment of mental disorders. This endeavour is nontrivial as current measures cover varying aspects and mindfulness and may have problems regarding validity. This presentation describes the development and validation of a questionnaire for the comprehensive assessment of mindfulness: the Comprehensive Inventory of Mindfulness Experiences (CHIME). Method: The factor structure, reliability, and validity of the CHIME were established in a community sample (N = 298) and a sample of MBSR group participants (N = 161). Results: Factor-analytical procedures supported an eight-factor structure. The structure was tested in a further confirmatory sample (N = 202). The questionnaire and its subscales exhibited good reliability (internal consistency and retest-reliability). Analysis of the measurement invariance of the single items over groups differing in age, gender, meditation experience, and symptom load pointed to the absence of systematic differences in the items' semantic understanding. Parameters reflecting construct validity, criterion validity, and incremental validity as well as change sensitivity were all at least satisfactory. Conclusions: The CHIME is a self-report measure with favorable psychometric properties based on all aspects of mindfulness that are included in current mindfulness scales. This scale may be helpful in the evaluation and further development of mindfulness based interventions.

Mindfulness-based cognitive therapie for depression (MBCT) in clinical practice - baseline patient characteristics, process and outcome

Introduction: Mindfulness based cognitive therapy for depression (MBCT) has shown to be effective for the reduction of depressive relapse. However, additional information regarding baseline patient characteristics and process features related to positive response could be helpful both for the provision of MBCT in clinical practice, as well as for its further development. Method: Baseline characteristics, process data, and immediate outcome (symptom change, change in attitudes and trait mindfulness) of 108 patients receiving MBCT in routine care were recorded. A newly developed self-report measure (Daily Mindfulness Scale, DMS) was applied daily during the MBCT program. Additionally, patients filed daily reports on their mindfulness practice. There was no control group available. Results: Patients with more severe initial symptoms indicated greater amounts of symptom improvement, but did not show great rates of dropout from the MBCT intervention. Younger age was related to higher rates of dropout. Contradictory to some previous data, patients with lower levels of initial trait mindfulness showed greater improvement in symptoms, even after controlling for initial levels of symptoms. Adherence to daily mindfulness practice was high. Consistent with this result, the duration of daily mindfulness practice was not related to immediate outcome. Process studies using multivariate time series analysis revealed a specific role of daily mindfulness in reducing subsequent negative mood. Conclusions: Within the range of patient present in this study and the given study design, results support the use of MBCT in more heterogeneous groups. This demanding intervention was well tolerated by patients with higher levels of symptoms, and resulted in significant improvements regarding residual symptoms. Process-outcome analyses of initial trait mindfulness and daily mindfulness both support the crucial role of changes in mindfulness for the effects of MBCT.

Neural circuits of emotion regulation: a comparison of mindfulness-based and cognitive reappraisal strategies

Dealing with one's emotions is a core skill in everyday life. Effective cognitive control strategies have been shown to be neurobiologically represented in prefrontal structures regulating limbic regions. In addition to cognitive strategies, mindfulness-associated methods are increasingly applied in psychotherapy. We compared the neurobiological mechanisms of these two strategies, i.e. cognitive reappraisal and mindfulness, during both the cued expectation and perception of negative and potentially negative emotional pictures. Fifty-three healthy participants were examined with functional magnetic resonance imaging (47 participants included in analysis). Twenty-four subjects applied mindfulness, 23 used cognitive reappraisal. On the neurofunctional level, both strategies were associated with comparable activity of the medial prefrontal cortex and the amygdala. When expecting negative versus neutral stimuli, the mindfulness group showed stronger activations in ventro- and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, supramarginal gyrus as well as in the left insula. During the perception of negative versus neutral stimuli, the two groups only differed in an increased activity in the caudate in the cognitive group. Altogether, both strategies recruited overlapping brain regions known to be involved in emotion regulation. This result suggests that common neural circuits are involved in the emotion regulation by mindfulness-based and cognitive reappraisal strategies. Identifying differential activations being associated with the two strategies in this study might be one step towards a better understanding of differential mechanisms of change underlying frequently used psychotherapeutic interventions.

Meta-Awareness During Day and Night: The Relationship Between Mindfulness and Lucid Dreaming

The present study explored the relationship between lucidity in dreams (awareness of dreams while dreaming) and mindfulness during wakefulness, also considering meditation as a possible moderating variable. An online survey was completed by 528 respondents, of whom 386 (73.1%) had lucid dream experiences. The reported frequency of lucid dreams was found to be positively related to higher dispositional mindfulness in wakefulness. This relationship was only present in those participants who reported acquaintance with meditation. Regarding the dimensions of mindfulness, lucid dream frequency was more strongly associated with mindful presence rather than acceptance. The findings support the notion of an existing relationship between lucidity in dreams and mindfulness during wakefulness, yet it remains unclear whether the relationship is influenced by actual meditation practice or whether it reflects some natural predispositions. Future studies should examine the role of different meditation practices, investigate personality variables that might influence the relationship, and explore how different facets of mindfulness and lucidity interrelate.

The Process-Outcome Mindfulness Effects in Trainees (PrOMET) study: protocol of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial

Background Mindfulness has its origins in an Eastern Buddhist tradition that is over 2500 years old and can be defined as a specific form of attention that is non-judgmental, purposeful, and focused on the present moment. It has been well established in cognitive-behavior therapy in the last decades, while it has been investigated in manualized group settings such as mindfulness-based stress reduction and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. However, there is scarce research evidence on the effects of mindfulness as a treatment element in individual therapy. Consequently, the demand to investigate mindfulness under effectiveness conditions in trainee therapists has been highlighted. Methods/Design To fill in this research gap, we designed the PrOMET Study. In our study, we will investigate the effects of brief, audiotape-presented, session-introducing interventions with mindfulness elements conducted by trainee therapists and their patients at the beginning of individual therapy sessions in a prospective, randomized, controlled design under naturalistic conditions with a total of 30 trainee therapists and 150 patients with depression and anxiety disorders in a large outpatient training center. We hypothesize that the primary outcomes of the session-introducing intervention with mindfulness elements will be positive effects on therapeutic alliance (Working Alliance Inventory) and general clinical symptomatology (Brief Symptom Checklist) in contrast to the session-introducing progressive muscle relaxation and treatment-as-usual control conditions. Treatment duration is 25 therapy sessions. Therapeutic alliance will be assessed on a session-to-session basis. Clinical symptomatology will be assessed at baseline, session 5, 15 and 25. We will conduct multilevel modeling to address the nested data structure. The secondary outcome measures include depression, anxiety, interpersonal functioning, mindful awareness, and mindfulness during the sessions. Discussion The study results could provide important practical implications because they could inform ideas on how to improve the clinical training of psychotherapists that could be implemented very easily; this is because there is no need for complex infrastructures or additional time concerning these brief session-introducing interventions with mindfulness elements that are directly implemented in the treatment sessions.

Achtsamkeitsinterventionen in Ausbildungspsychotherapien: die "Process-Outcome Mindfulness Effects in Trainees (PROMET)-Studie"

Achtsamkeit hat seine Ursprünge in einer über 2500 Jahre alten, östlich-buddhistischen Tradition und kann konzeptualisiert werden als eine spezifische Form der Aufmerksamkeit, die nicht-bewertend, absichtsvoll und auf den aktuellen Moment fokussiert ist. Zentrale Ziel dieser Studie zu identifizieren, ob Übungen mit Achtsamkeitselementen, die zu Beginn von Therapiesitzungen durchgeführt werden, helfen können, den therapeutischen Prozess zu verbessern. Spezifischer werden die Effekte einer kurzen Übung mit Achtsamkeitselementen auf den therapeutischen Prozess und Behandlungserfolg unter Effectiveness-Bedingungen untersucht, die von ambulanten Patienten und Therapeuten gemeinsam zu Beginn jeder Therapiestunde durchgeführt wird. Dabei werden 150 Patienten vor dem Start ihrer therapeutischen Behandlung und nach Abschluss einer sechs Sitzungen andauernden diagnostischen Phase randomisiert auf entweder eine Achtsamkeitsinterventionsgruppe (AIG), eine Kontrollgruppe (KG), die eine Kurzversion von Progressiver Muskelrelaxation (PMR) durchführt, oder auf eine Treatment As Usual (TAU)-Gruppe. Das Studiendesign und erste Ergebnisse einer Vorstudie werden skizziert.

Evaluación del "Mindfulness": aplicación del cuestionario "Mindfulness" de cinco facetas (FFMQ) en población española

El objetivo empírico del presente trabajo ha sido el de realizar una serie de estudios para evaluar las propiedades psicométricas del FFMQ en población española (FFMQ-E). Los estudios empíricos realizados han cubierto el análisis de la estructura factorial y la bondad de ajuste del FFMQ-E, así como su validez y fiabilidad, además de la sensibilidad al cambio. Los resultados de dichos estudios se muestran a continuación: En base al análisis factorial exploratorio realizado con voluntarios españoles (N= 241), el FFMQ-E mantiene una estructura factorial de cinco facetas. Sin embargo dicha estructura es diferente a la de la versión original. Tres de las cinco facetas: –observar (excepto uno de sus ítems), –actuar con conciencia y –no enjuiciamiento, obtuvieron los pesos factoriales que las ubicaban según la escala original. Sin embargo ciertos ítems de la faceta –describir y la totalidad de los de la faceta de -no reactividad se ubican en el mismo factor; mientras que tres ítems de la faceta –describir presentaron pesos factoriales que los ubicaban en un factor diferente. Por otra parte, cinco ítems obtuvieron pesos factoriales bajos o repartidos con valores similares en varios factores. En relación a las bondades de ajuste del modelo factorial, se encontró tras el análisis factorial confirmatorio, una baja bondad de ajuste para los diferentes modelos explorados (de cuatro y cinco factores, tanto jerárquico como de correlaciones) en el grupo de voluntarios españoles (N= 241). La consistencia interna (alfa de Cronbach) en nuestro grupo de voluntarios (N= 285) fue de adecuada a buena. Los valores de alfa de Cronbach encontrados en nuestro estudio fueron los siguientes: -observar= 0,76, -describir= 0,81, -actuar con conciencia= 0,88 y –no enjuiciamiento= 0,86, con valores por encima de 0,70, excepto para la faceta de –no reactividad, que obtuvo un valor bajo de 0,66. La fiabilidad test-retest (N= 56) mostró valores de aceptables a buenos por encima de 0,60 con significación estadística (p<0,001) para un periodo de cuatro semanas...

Exploring mindfulness as a culturally sensitive intervention for the Deaf community

Mental health issues are as prevalent in the deaf community as the hearing community, if not more. Yet, Deaf individuals are often treated by mental health professionals less frequently and less effectively. Many systemic barriers exist that influence the lack of services provided to the Deaf community, primarily related to a lack of cultural understanding rooted in perceptions of Deaf individuals. However, the Deaf community may be best understood as a cultural minority, a unique community sharing a distinct culture, history, and language. This paper investigates the effects of systematic barriers and cultural misunderstanding among mental health professions regarding the Deaf community, explores the historical and current mental health problems Deaf individuals most commonly struggle with, and proposes a potential culturally sensitive intervention for the Deaf community based on these factors. To examine these issues, the author conducted a thorough review of Deaf cultural history and values, as well as a review of peer-reviewed articles regarding both Deaf mental health and mindfulness outcome studies. Based on this review, mindfulness may be an effective, culturally sensitive intervention that addresses both cultural and psychological components while working with the Deaf population.