Qualité de vie après traitement de l'insuffisance veineuse superficielle primaire. [Quality of life in patients traited for primary superficial venous insufficiency].

Venous symptoms and quality of life (QOL) of 78 patients (54 women, mean age 49,5±13,3 years) with primary superficial venous insufficiency (PSVI) were compared at one year after treatment with crossectomy and stripping (C/S, 56 patients) or endovenous laser ablation (EVLA, 22 patients) using the VEINES-QOL questionnaire. Both treatments significantly (p<0,001) improved the scores for venous symptoms (difference 10,6±9,9 and 9,9±8,2 score points for C/S and EVLA, respectively) and QOL (difference 10,3±8,7 and 8,4±6,6 score points for C/S and EVLA, respectively). No difference was found between treatments regarding symptoms or QOL improvement (p=0,30). We conclude that C/S and EVLA are equally effective in improving symptoms and QOL in PSVI.

Insuffisance de la déclaration de M. l'évêque de Clermont, au sujet du serment civique, dans la séance du vendredi matin 9 juillet 1790 : en remède pour tous les malades, surtout ceux de l'Assemblée ([Reprod.]) / [par l'abbé Rougane]

Collection : Les archives de la Révolution française ; 8.421

Fibrose rétropéritonéale: cause rare d'insuffisance rénale postrénale, a ne pas méconnaître [Retroperitoneal fibrosis: a rare cause of postrenal kidney failure, no to be missed].

We report the observation of a fifty years old man, admitted in the emergency room for bilateral lumbar pain and hyperkaliemic metabolic acidosis, and postrenal kidney failure induced by bilateral hydronephrosis. Radiographic exploration and histologic studies of biopsy confirmed an idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis that clinically and biologicaly responded to three seances of hemodialysis, and insertion in each uretere of one double J stent, and long term corticotherapy. The retroperitoneal fibrosis is a little common inflammatory disease, characterized by the development of a fibrous mass around the retroperitoneal structures. His diagnostic means evolved. On the other hand, his treatment was the object of no checked controlled and randomized trial. This article proposes an updating of the knowledge on this subject.

La néphropathie ischémique par athérosclérose aortorénale : acquisitions thérapeutiques [Atherosclerotic renal artery disease management update]

In the case of atherosclerotic renal artery disease, the best conclusive results lie principally not in the degree of the stenosis but rather in the degree the renal parenchymal disease beyond the stenosis itself. These determining factors involve the controlling of the patients blood pressure, the improvement in the renal function and the beneficial results to the cardiovascular system. Besides the indispensable medical treatment, a revascularisation by angioplasty may be indicated. This procedure with or without vascular stent often allows satisfactory angiographic results. A treatment by surgical revascularisation is only recommended in the case of extensive atherosclerotic lesions of the aorta, complex lesions of the latter or an abdominal aortic aneurism. Although the frequency of restenosis of angioplasty with stent remains extremely low, the risk of cholesterol emboli due to the diffuse atherosclerotic lesions of the abdominal aorta, must be considered at the time of each aortic catheterization. The therapeutic approach of atherosclerotic renal artery disease must be dictated by the whole cardiovascular risk factors and by the threat of target organs. The control of the blood pressure and the maintenance of the renal function must be integrated in the decisional algorithm as well as the possible risks in carrying out an eventual revascularisation procedure. Finally, the renal angioplasty should in numerous situations be integrated in the overall assumption of responsibility of the atherosclerotic vascular diseases, and should be part of the medical treatment. Several questions still do exist; at what moment an atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis should and e considered critical, and which procedure should be considered for which patient? The purpose of this review is to propose a decisional tool for individualized treatments in the light of results from randomized and controlled studies.