No name, 1935

[A distant figure follows a trail through the snow towards a line of tents]

No name, 1935

[With thumbs in his work pants pockets, a man stands at the rear end of a car, tents can be seen in the background with a figure seated at a bench]

No name, 1936

[A man in a sweater leans against the hood of a car with one hand in this pocket, more cars can be seen parked in the background]

No name, 1936

[Distantly a man walks through a camp, several tents line either side of the walkway]

No name, undated

[A car is parked near a memorial cannon with a figure draped over it, a flagpole and sign for a casino are positioned nearby]

No name, 1936

[A man dressed in casual clothing stands at the bottom of stairs leading to a brick building, his hands clasped in front of him]

No name, undated

[A man in work clothes poses with a large transport truck]

No name, undated

[Three men and a dog pose on the back a car, two others are seen in the background near a tent]

No name, 1936

[A man in formal attire stands at attention with a background of cabins]

No name, 1936

[Seated near a medic cross propped against a doorway, a man dressed in casual wear smiles for his photograph]

No name, 1936, enlargement of earlier photo

[A man dressed in casual clothing stands at the bottom of stairs leading to a brick building, his hands clasped in front of him]

Essex Institute historical collections.

Some issues have also a distinctive title.

An historical and critical account of the lives and writings of James I. and Charles I. and of the lives of Oliver Cromwell and Charles II... From original writers and state-papers.

Originally published (1751-66) as separate works. The life of Peters appeared without the author's name.

Mackey topology on locally convex spaces and on locally quasi-convex groups. Similarities and historical remarks

A counterpart of the Mackey–Arens Theorem for the class of locally quasi-convex topological Abelian groups (LQC-groups) was initiated in Chasco et al. (Stud Math 132(3):257–284, 1999). Several authors have been interested in the problems posed there and have done clarifying contributions, although the main question of that source remains open. Some differences between the Mackey Theory for locally convex spaces and for locally quasi-convex groups, stem from the following fact: The supremum of all compatible locally quasi-convex topologies for a topological abelian group G may not coincide with the topology of uniform convergence on the weak quasi-convex compact subsets of the dual groupG∧. Thus, a substantial part of the classical Mackey–Arens Theorem cannot be generalized to LQC-groups. Furthermore, the mentioned fact gives rise to a grading in the property of “being a Mackey group”, as defined and thoroughly studied in Díaz Nieto and Martín-Peinador (Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics 80:119–144, 2014). At present it is not known—and this is the main open question—if the supremum of all the compatible locally quasi-convex topologies on a topological group is in fact a compatible topology. In the present paper we do a sort of historical review on the Mackey Theory, and we compare it in the two settings of locally convex spaces and of locally quasi-convex groups. We point out some general questions which are still open, under the name of Problems.

Handle with care: historical geographies and difficult cultural legacies of egg-collecting

This thesis offers an examination of egg-collecting, which was a very popular pastime in Britain from the Victorian era well into the twentieth century. Collectors, both young and old, would often spend whole days and sometimes longer trips in a wide variety of different habitats, from sea shores to moorlands, wetlands to craggy mountainsides, searching for birds’ nests and the bounty to be found within them. Once collectors had found and taken eggs, they emptied out the contents; hence, they were really eggshell collectors. Some egg collectors claimed that egg-collecting was not just a hobby but a science, going by the name of oology, and seeking to establish oology as a recognised sub-discipline of ornithology, these collectors or oologists established formal institutions such as associations and societies, attended meetings where they exhibited unusual finds, and also contributed to specialist publications dedicated to oology. Egg-collecting was therefore many things at once: a culture of the British countryside, from where many eggs were taken; a culture of natural history, taking on the trappings of a science; and a culture of enthusiasm, providing a consuming passion for many collectors. By the early twentieth century, however, opposing voices were increasingly being raised, by conservation groups and other observers, about the impact that egg-collecting was having on bird populations and on the welfare of individual birds. By mid-century the tide had turned against the collectors, and egg-collecting in Britain was largely outlawed in 1954, with further restrictions imposed in 1981. While many egg collections have been lost or destroyed, some have been donated to museums, including Glasgow Museums (GM), which holds in its collections over 30,000 eggs. As a Collaborative Doctoral Award involving the University of Glasgow and GM, the project outlined in this thesis aims to bring to light and to life these egg collections, the activities of the collectors who originally built them, and the wider world of British egg-collecting. By researching archival material held by Glasgow Museums, published specialist egg-collecting journals and other published sources, as well as the eggs as a material archive, this thesis seeks to recover some of the practices and preoccupations of egg collectors. It also recounts the practical activities carried out during the course of the project at GM, particularly those involving a collection of eggs newly donated to the museum during the course of this project, culminating in a new temporary display of birds’ eggs at Glasgow Museums Resource Centre.