Private versus public : how one gay professor negotiates the boundaries between his personal and professional lives /

This study examined how one university professor negotiated the boundaries between his personal life as a gay man and his professional life as a teacher. Using his sexual orientation as a focal point, the study explored the circumstances and underlying assumptions that influenced this professor's decisions to disclose information of a personal nature. Data collection was solicited from a number of sources: (a) In-depth interviews with the participant, his colleagues, students, and friends; (b) Field observation of the participant teaching over a 3 -day period; and (c) A document review of lesson plans, course outlines, student feedback forms, and the participant's teaching portfolio. The researcher maintained both observation journals and reflective journals during this process. Data analysis using the constant comparative method elicited several themes. The participant engaged in a variety of strategies in disclosing his sexual orientation that included: (a) no disclosure at all, (b) assuming people knew, (c) casually mentioning it in conversation, and (d) deliberately planning to tell someone. The participant also engaged in an ongoing assessment of his environment that included evaluating the level of risk in disclosing his sexual orientation and assessing the listener's ability to receive the information. The participant cited numerous reasons for disclosing his sexual orientation. Further inquiry revealed a number of belief systems that underlined these reasons. These belief systems included beliefs around privacy, authenticity, teaching, manners, professionalism, and homosexuality. The conclusions suggested that the participant utilized a consistent process in both his personal and professional lives to determine what information was kept private and what information was made public. While the process used to determine the degree of disclosure was consistent, the actual disclosures themselves varied widely in nature.

Subjective Ambivalence and the Expression of Anti-Gay Bias

Univalent attitudes toward gay people have been widely studied, but no research to date has examined ambivalent (i.e., torn, conflicted) attitudes toward gay people. However, the Justification-Suppression Model (JSM; Crandall & Eshleman, 2003) proposes that ambivalence leads to biased expressions through intrapsychic processes which facilitate biased expression, particularly in contexts presenting strong justifications for expressing prejudice and weak pressures to suppress prejudice. I test these implications in the context of bias toward gay people. In Study 1, the measurement of ambivalence is examined in terms of both subjective ambivalence (i.e., the reported experience of “torn” attitudes) and calculated ambivalence (i.e., mathematical conflict between positive and negative attitude components). I find that higher subjective ambivalence is only associated with more negative attitudes toward gay people (and not positive attitudes toward gay people), and that higher subjective ambivalence predicts less gay rights support even after taking negative and positive attitudes toward gay people into account. Further, higher subjective ambivalence is associated with ideological opposition to gay people and more negative intergroup emotions (e.g., intergroup disgust). These findings suggest it is valuable to examine the unique component of subjective ambivalence separate from univalent negativity. Because calculated ambivalence measures are mathematically dependent upon a univalent negative measure, they cannot be examined separately from negativity. Therefore, subjective ambivalence is the focus of Study 2. The main goals of Study 2 were to determine why and when subjective ambivalence is related to bias. I examined the extent to which the negative relation between subjective ambivalence and opposition to anti-gay bullying can be accounted for by lower intergroup empathy and lower collective guilt, which may facilitate the expression of bias in keeping with the JSM. The relation between subjective ambivalence and anti-gay bullying opposition was examined within four social contexts based on a 2 (high vs. low offensiveness) x 2 (normatively unjustified vs. normatively justified) manipulation. I expected that higher subjective ambivalence would be most strongly related to lower intergroup empathy and collective guilt when there are the strongest justifications for bias expression, and that lower intergroup empathy and collective guilt would lead to less opposition to anti-gay bullying. Higher subjective ambivalence predicted less anti-gay bullying opposition. After accounting for positivity and negativity, the direct effect of subjective ambivalence was no longer significant, yet subjective ambivalence uniquely predicted intergroup empathy, which in turn predicted less anti-gay bullying opposition. These findings provide evidence that subjective ambivalence is largely negative in nature, but also presents evidence for a unique component of subjective ambivalence (separate from univalent attitudes) associated with low intergroup empathy and negativity. In contrast to previous research, I found very little evidence for the context-dependency of subjective ambivalence. Further research on subjective ambivalence, including subjective ambivalence toward other social groups, may expand our understanding of the factors leading to biased expressions.

Towards an inculturated african communal model of ecclesia : clergy-laity collaborative ministry in Igboland of Southern Nigeria

Thèse numérisée par la Division de la gestion de documents et des archives de l'Université de Montréal

Les vidéos de gay bashing : des agresseurs à YouTube

La recherche portera sur la montée des vidéos de gay bashing depuis 2013. Par vidéo de gay bashing, nous entendons des vidéos documentant l’abus physique ou verbal d’individus perçus par les agresseurs comme étant gais, lesbiennes, bisexuels, transgenres ou queer, mais nous nous concentrerons spécifiquement sur des vidéos montrant des agressions envers des hommes. Ces vidéos peuvent être enregistrées par les agresseurs eux-mêmes ou par des témoins de la scène. Il s’agira de situer cette montée dans un contexte politique de retour de lois et sentiments anti-LGBT dans les pays d’où proviennent certaines des vidéos étudiées et par rapport aux différentes théories anthropologiques et socio-historiques concernant les sources et motivations derrière les actes de violence homophobe. Le corpus se composera de trois vidéos venant de Russie («Putin’s Crackdown on LGBT Teens un Russia»), de Lybie («Gay torture and violent in Lybia») et des États-Unis («Attack at gay pride event in Detroit»). L’analyse du corpus se fera en trois temps : d’abord l’analyse de la forme et du contenu des vidéos en tant que tels, ensuite, l’analyse de leur circulation et des différents utilisateurs qui distribuent les vidéos en ligne, et, finalement, l’analyse de la réception des vidéos en portant attention aux commentaires des utilisateurs. Il s’agira de montrer comment les vidéos de gay-bashing effectuent une rupture par rapport à une vision de YouTube, et autres médias sociaux, comme libérateurs et comme lieux d’expression de soi (particulièrement pour les membres des communautés LGBT) et les transforment en lieux d’une humiliation triplée par l’enregistrement de l’humiliation physique et sa diffusion sur le web. Il s’agira ensuite de voir comment la circulation et la redistribution de ces vidéos par différents groupes et utilisateurs les instrumentalisent selon différents agendas politiques et idéologiques, pour finalement se questionner, en s’inspirant du triangle de l’humiliation de Donald Klein, sur le rôle ambivalent du témoin (physique ou virtuel) dont la présence est nécessaire pour qu’il y ait humiliation. Finalement, nous nous intéresserons aux vidéos de témoignages de gay-bashing, vidéos faites par les victimes elles-mêmes, racontant leur traumatisme à la caméra, renouant ainsi avec les vidéos de coming out sous la forme de l’aveu et de la spectacularisation du soi. La présente recherche sera également l’occasion de développer des outils théoriques et méthodologiques propres aux nouveaux médias et aux nouvelles formes et contenus qui s’y développent.

Los movimientos sociales contemporáneos El caso del movimiento gay en Bogotá

La presente monografía tiene como objeto principal indagar a cerca del movimiento gay en Bogotá como movimiento social contemporáneo. Partiendo de la premisa de que en las sociedades complejas los sujetos sociales crean formas de acción colectiva que deben ser comprendidas a partir de su interacción, y de los roces que estas acciones tienen con los discursos hegemónicos, de forma tal que su estudio pueda mostrar la evolución y progresivo desarrollo de las agendas, prácticas y movilización de los actores, sus intereses y los recursos simbólicos, materiales y políticos que los motivan e intervienen en la formación de identidades políticas particulares. En este sentido, la presente investigación analiza la forma como el movimiento gay en Bogotá desarrolla su identidad y describe como éste se articula como un actor social y político en un entorno antagónico de política urbana, heterosexual y poco receptiva de las enunciaciones no hegemónicas de la política.

Suicidal ideation in Spanish and Italian lesbian and gay young adults : the role of internalized sexual stigma

Resumen tomado de la publicaci??n

Reflexiones de un profesor gay fuera del armario

Resumen tomado de la publicaci??n

Betty la fea y Chepe fortuna: representación de lo gay y lo homosexual en la telenovela colombiana

Esta tesis tiene como propósito indagar en diferentes aspectos de la representación gay y homosexual en la telenovela colombiana y estudiar el funcionamiento de las diferentes representaciones de masculinidad tomando como corpus principal Yo soy Betty la Fea y Chepe fortuna, dos de las telenovelas más reconocidas entre los años 1999 y 2010.

Representación social gay y trans: incidencia del discurso heterosexista

El presente trabajo de investigación tuvo por objetivo determinar cómo las representaciones sociales inciden en la conformación de los sistemas de creencias e ideologías de las personas gays y trans, a partir de la hegemonía del sistema heterosexista y su discurso normativo. Para esto, fueron analizadas categorías como ideología, prejuicio, heteronormatividad, discriminación y endodiscriminación. Ello ameritó un estudio de casos, realizado con miembros activistas de las instituciones ecuatorianas: Fundación Equidad y el Proyecto Transgénero, quienes compartieron sus experiencias de vida, así como reflexiones surgidas de su militancia y deconstrucción del modelo heteronormativo. El estudio arrojó como resultado que el lenguaje, profundamente imbricado en las representaciones sociales, constituye en el sujeto posiciones de identidad atravesadas por efectos de la discriminación y el prejuicio. Aunque, paradójicamente, la emergencia de corrientes contrahegemónicas al interior de los colectivos de gays y trans permite resignificar la palabra hiriente y darle lugar en la sociedad al no heterosexual. Además, se constató que, pese a ciertos avances legislativos género‐sensibles, persiste una clara diferenciación social entre lo que es considerado “normal” y lo “anti‐natural”; específicamente, entre el “nosotros correcto” y el “ellos” insurrecto a la norma, pensado como invivible y abyecto. Importa pensar, entonces, el efecto que ejercen instituciones de poder, como la iglesia, la clínica y el ámbito judicial.