Creation of a Reconstruction Finance Corporation : hearings ... Seventy-second Congress, first session on S. 1, a bill to provide emergency financing facilities for banks and other financial institutions and for other purposes. December 18, 19, 21, 22, 1931.

Frederic C. Walcott, chairman.

The RTC : in the midst of America's real estate crisis : hearing before the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions Supervision, Regulation and Insurance, Resolution Trust Corporation Task Force of the Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs, House of Representatives, One Hundred Second Congress, first session, July 26, 1991.

"Serial no. 102-64."

Alleged misappropriation by New York City's Department of Housing, Preservation, and Development : field hearing before the Subcommittee on General Oversight, Investigations, and the Resolution of Failed Financial Institutions of the Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, first session, February 10, 1993.

Mode of access: Internet.

East St. Louis housing problems hearings before the Subcommittee on Housing and Mortgage Reform of the Committee on Financial Institutions.

At head of title: Transcript.

Financial institutions processing procedures manual [for passenger car and motocycle license plates]

Description based on: 1980; title from cover.

Report on the housing hearings before the Subcommittee on Housing and Mortgage Reform to the House Committee on Financial Institutions, January, 1979, 80th General Assembly /

Cover title.

Urban housing hearings before the Subcommittee on Housing and Mortgage Reform of the Committee on Financial Institutions : Chicago, Illinois, August 11 and 12, 1977.

At head of title: Transcript.

[Reorganization and consolidation of the Illinois Dept. of Insurance, Illinois Office of Banks and Real Estate, Illinois Dept. of Professional Regulation, and the Illinois Dept. of Financial Institutions into the Illinois Dept. of Financial and Professional Regulation]

As part of the Governor's effort to streamline State government through improvements in the efficiency and effectiveness of operations, Executive Order 2004-06 ("EO6") provided for the reorganization (consolidation) of the Department of Insurance, Office of Banks and Real Estate, Department of Professional Regulation and Department of Financial Institutions. Through EO6 the four predecessor Agencies were abolished and a single new agency, The Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (hereafter referred to as "IDFPR") was created. The purpose of the consolidation of the four regulatory agencies was to allow for certain economies of scale to be realized primarily within the executive management and administrative functions. Additionally, the consolidation would increases the effectiveness of operations through the integration of certain duplicative functions within the four predecessor agencies without the denegration of the frontline functions. Beginning on or about July 1, 2004, the IDFPR began consolidation activities focusing primarily on the administrative functions of Executive Management, Fiscal and Accounting, General Counsel, Human Resources, Information Technology and Other Administrative Services. The underlying premise of the reorganization was that all improvements could be accomplished without the denegration of the frontline functions of the predecessor agencies. Accordingly, all powers, duties, rights, responsibilities and functions of the predecessor agencies migrated to IDFPR and the reorganization activities commenced July 1, 2004.

International finance : market access concerns of U.S. financial institutions in Japan : briefing report to Congressional requesters /

"GAO/NSIAD-88-108R."

Religious compliance in Islamic financial institutions

The central goal of this research is to explore the approach of the Islamic banking industry in defining and implementing religious compliance at regulatory, institutional, and individual level within the Islamic Banking and Finance (IBF) industry. It also examines the discrepancies, ambiguities and paradoxes that are exhibited in the individual and institutional behaviour in relation to the infusion and enactment of religious exigencies into compliance processes in IBF. Through the combined lenses of institutional work and a sensemaking perspective, this research portrays the practice of infusion of Islamic law in Islamic banks as being ambiguous and drifting down to the institutional and actor levels. In instances of both well-codified and non-codified regulatory frameworks for Shariah compliance, institutional rules ambiguity, rules interpretation and enactment ambiguities were found to be prevalent. The individual IBF professionals performed retrospective and prospective actions to adjust the role and rules boundaries both in the case of a Muslim and a non-Muslim country. The sensitizing concept of religious compliance is the primary theoretical contribution of this research and provides a tool to understand the nature of what constitutes Shariah compliance and the dynamics of its implementation. It helps to explain the empirical consequences of the lack of a clear definition of Shariah compliance in the regulatory frameworks and standards available for the industry. It also addresses the calls to have a clear reference on what constitute Shariah compliance in IBF as proposed in previous studies (Hayat, Butter, & Kock, 2013; Maurer, 2003, 2012; Pitluck, 2012). The methodological and theoretical perspective of this research are unique in the use of multi-level analysis and approaches that blend micro and macro perspectives of the research field, to illuminate and provide a more complete picture of religious compliance infusion and enactment in IBF.