Dinámicas biopoéticas del "Prototractatus" y el "Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus" de Ludwig Wittgenstein : arquitectura cognitiva de las proposiciones

Programa de doctorado: Nuevas perspectivas cognitivas en los estudios de lengua, literatura y traducción. La fecha de publicación es la fecha de lectura Tesis doctoral europea

Emissão e omissão no Wittgenstein de Rorty

O trabalho de Ludwig Wittgenstein é uma das mais constantes referências no percurso de Richard Rorty, cujos escritos, por sua vez, assumem um papel de relevo no âmbito do comentário wittgensteiniano. Apesar de abundarem os textos que contestam a leitura que Rorty faz de Wittgenstein, não há nenhum que, de forma global, vise analisar o modo como se desenrola tal leitura. Na parte I, faremos, pois, o retrato da leitura que Rorty faz de Wittgenstein, recorrendo aos três artigos que o norte-americano escreveu sobre o pensador austríaco: “Keeping Philosophy Pure: an Essay on Wittgenstein”, publicado em 1982, no livro Consequences of Pragmatism – Essays 1972-1980; “Wittgenstein, Heidegger, and the reification of language”, publicado, em 1991, no segundo volume dos Philosophical Papers de Rorty; e “Wittgenstein and the Linguistic Turn”, publicado em 2007, no quarto e último volume dos Philosophical Papers. Na parte II, procuraremos pôr em relevo três implicações democráticas do pensamento de Ludwig Wittgenstein, as quais, apesar de não mencionadas por Rorty, não só são compatíveis com o seu pragmatismo como, sobretudo, estabelecem uma conexão que Rorty não fez: aquela que liga o Rorty leitor de Wittgenstein ao Rorty que reflecte sobre os fundamentos da democracia. A defesa da democracia e a leitura de Wittgenstein surgem separadas no pensamento de Rorty; a sugestão que permeia a parte II é que teria sido mais frutífero, para Rorty e de acordo com os seus próprios parâmetros, estabelecer uma conexão entre o trabalho de Wittgenstein e a reflexão acerca da democracia. Argumenta-se que a pertinência de tal conexão permite concluir que Rorty rejeitou precipitadamente os termos terapia, metafísica e humanidade, na medida em que os mesmos, desde que entendidos num determinado sentido, são úteis para pensar a democracia como exigindo uma certa terapia, como o sistema que privilegia uma pluralidade de metafísicas ou como o modo de convívio no qual a humanidade consiste num espaço relacional de intercâmbio linguístico.

Suurten ajattelijoiden elämäkerrat ja elämänpolut. Bertrand Russellin, Ludwig Wittgensteinin ja Georg Henrik von Wrightin elämäkerrat bourdieulais-pragmatististen ja latourilaisten näkökulmien vertailussa

Perinteisesti elämäkertoja on kirjoitettu sankareista, suurmiehistä tai jollakin tapaa erityislaatuisina pidetyistä henkilöistä. Bertrand Russell, Ludwig Wittgenstein ja Georg Henrik von Wright täyttävät suuren ajattelijan kriteerit. Tämän tutkimuksen lähtökohta on, ettei suuren ajattelijan asemaa voi saavuttaa ilman yhteisön hyväksyvää arviota. Usein sankariaseman tai jopa neron maineen saavuttaneiden menestyksen taustalla on auttajia, kollegoita, oppi-isiä, sopiva työtilaisuus, joskus jopa maailmanpoliittinen tilanne. Keitä tai mitä ovat nämä muut, usein vähälle huomiolle jääneet, menestystekijät kolmen filosofin urapoluilla? Tässä tutkimuksessa menestyksen osatekijöitä etsitään filosofien elämä- ja omaelämäkerroista kahden työtä varten konstruoidun käsitteellisen lähestymistavan avulla. Niistä ensimmäinen nojaa pääosin ranskalaisen sosiologin Pierre Bourdieun ajatuksiin habituksesta, kentästä ja kentällä tarvittavista pääomista yhdistettynä amerikkalaisen pragmatistifilosofin John Deweyn habit-käsitteeseen. Toinen lähestymistapa soveltaa ranskalaisen tieteensosiologin Bruno Latourin toimijaverkkoteoriaa. Paitsi metodologista hyötyä, lähestymistapojen vertailun tarkoitus on tuottaa apuvälineitä elämäkertojen analysoijille, lukijoille ja miksei myös niiden kirjoittajille.

Form(s)-of-life: agamben's reading of Wittgenstein and the potential uses of a notion

Giorgio Agamben and Ludwig Wittgenstein seem to have very little in common: the former is concerned with traditional ontological issues while the latter was interested in logics and ordinary language, avoiding metaphysical issues as something we cannot speak about. However, both share a crucial notion for their philosophical projects: form of life. In this paper, I try to show that, despite their different approaches and goals, form of life is for both a crucial notion for thinking ethics and life in-common. Addressing human existence in its constitutive relation to language, this notion deconstructs traditional dichotomies like bios and zoé, the cultural and the biological, enabling both authors to think of a life which cannot be separated from its forms, recognizing the commonality of logos as the specific trait of human existence. Through an analogical reading between both theoretical frameworks, I suggest that the notion of form-of-life, elaborated by Wittgenstein to address human production of meaning, becomes the key notion in Agamben's affirmative thinking since it enables us to consider the common ontologically in its relation to Human potentialities and to foresee a new, common use of the world and ourselves.

La réflexion phénoménologique au crible de la grammaire : la question de l’expression de la vie intérieure de la conscience chez Husserl et Wittgenstein

Cotutelle avec l'Université Panthéon Sorbonne - Paris I

Wittgenstein y su concepto de la filosofía.

Se realiza un estudio sobre el filósofo Ludwig Wittgenstein, cuya filosofía está caracterizada por romper con los encasillamientos de la época, por estar relacionada con los problemas del lenguaje, y vinculada al movimiento neopositivista. En su obra aparece una profunda relación entre los problemas filosóficos y el lenguaje, y esta idea aparece en tres momentos de su evolución filosófica: la etapa del tractatus logico-philosophicus; la filosofía en los cuadernos azul y marrón; y la filosofía en las investigaciones filosóficas.

Wittgenstein e Bourdieu: diálogos para uma sociologia prática

The dialogue between philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein s notions and Pierre Bourdieu s sociological concepts related to social practice of language shows that the philosophy of language has an important influence on contemporary social theory. When we compare the ideas of these authors we discover that beyond the direct influences from the philosopher that the sociologist recognizes there are great parallelisms of thought. That is, Wittgenstein s pragmatic thought of the use of language does not concern only language, but also every socially built behavior. When we notice that the social and linguistic behavior are borne by the individual in a tacit way, that leads us to theorize about the prereflective dimension that builds human actions and even the habits of thought. The same processes allow the uses of language to build wider social practices. Besides, John Austin, one of Wittgenstein s disciples, and his speech acts theory, contribute with a way to reflecting on how language ressembles a concrete action. Finally, the linguistc therapy that Wittgenstein means to be his philosophical proposal is assimilated by Bourdieu, who takes it as one of the necessary topics of the sociological work

Sobre jogo de linguagem: Habermas e Wittgenstein

This paper brings notes regarding Wittgenstein’s philosophy of language and its presence in habermasian philosophy by means of the basic concept language game. The approach of language of the second Wittgenstein reaches a rather culturalist abstraction, which, however, disclaims him of the pretension of being a theoretical of language, but in Habermas, this approach is put with an intention: the systematization of the universal pragmatics, which he presents as a theory of language games.

Repensando o sentido formativo da atividade filosófica à luz do “Trabalho sobre si-mesmo” de Wittgenstein: se filosofar é trabalhar sobre si, o que se trabalha quando se filosofa?

Pós-graduação em Educação - FFC

Later Wittgenstein's Anti-Philosophical Therapy

The object of this essay is to discuss Ludwig Wittgenstein's remarks in Philosophical Investigations and elsewhere in the posthumously published writings concerning the role of therapy in relation to philosophy. Wittgenstein's reflections seem to suggest that there is a kind of philosophy or mode of investigation targeting the philosophical grammar of language uses that gratuitously give rise to philosophical problems, and produce in many thinkers philosophical anxieties for which the proper therapy is intended to offer relief. Two possible objectives of later Wittgensteinian therapy are proposed, for subjective psychological versus objective semantic symptoms of ailments that a therapy might address for the sake of relieving philosophical anxieties. The psychological in its most plausible form is rejected, leaving only the semantic. Semantic therapy in the sense defined and developed is more general and long-lasting, and more in the spirit of Wittgenstein's project on a variety of levels. A semantic approach treats language rather than the thinking, language-using subject as the patient needing therapy, and directs its attention to the treatment of problems in language and the conceptual framework a language game use expresses in its philosophical grammar, rather than to soothing unhappy or socially ill-adjusted individual psychologies.