German companies strengthen their cooperation with Russian gas suppliers. OSW Commentary No. 64, 2011-10-24

Germany’s decision to give up the use of nuclear energy will force it to find a conventional low-carbon energy source as a replacement; in the short term, in addition to coal, this is likely to be gas. Due to their continued high debt and the losses associated with the end of atomic power, German companies will not be able to spend large funds on investing in conventional energy. First of all, they will aim to raise capital and repay their debts. The money for this will come from selling off their less profitable assets; this will include sales on the gas market. This will create opportunities for natural gas exporters and extraction companies such as Gazprom to buy back some of the German companies’ assets (electricity companies, for example). The German companies will probably continue to seek to recover the costs incurred in the investment projects already underway, such as Nord Stream, the importance of which will grow after Russian gas imports increase. At the same time, because of their debts, the German companies will seek to minimise their investment costs by selling some shares on the conventional energy market, to Russian corporations among others; the latter would thus be able to increase their stake in the gas market in both Western (Germany, Great Britain, the Benelux countries) and Central Europe (Poland, the Czech Republic). It is possible that while establishing the details of cooperation between the Russian and German companies, Russia will try to put pressure on Germany to give up competing projects such as Nabucco. However, a well-diversified German energy market should be able to defend itself against attempts to increase German dependence on Russian gas supplies and the dictates of high prices.

Profiles of automotive suppliers industries - engineered mechanical components.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C.

Arms industries : new suppliers and regional security /

Includes bibliographical references (p. 169-189) and index.

Analysis of federal stimuli to development of new technology by suppliers to automobile manufacturers. An exploratory study of barriers and facilitators. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C.

Alleged coercive and discriminatory practices against retail gasoline operators by oil company suppliers : interim report of Subcommittee No. 5 on Distribution Problems to the Select Committee on Small Business, House of Representatives, Eighty-fourth Congress, first session, pursuant to H. Res. 114, a resolution creating a Select Committee to Conduct a Study and Investigation of the Problems of Small Business.

Mode of access: Internet.

AID small business circular; trade opportunities for American suppliers

Mode of access: Internet.

Directory of Medicare suppliers of services.

Mode of access: Internet.

Optimal price regulation in a growth model with monopolistic suppliers of intermediate goods

In this paper we investigate the trade-off faced by regulators who must set a price for an intermediate good somewhere between the marginal cost and the monopoly price. We utilize a growth model with monopolistic suppliers of intermediate goods. Investment in innovation is required to produce a new intermediate good. Marginal cost pricing deters innovation, while monopoly pricing maximizes innovation and economic growth at the cost of some static inefficiency. We demonstrate the existence of a second-best price above the marginal cost but below the monopoly price, which maximizes consumer welfare. Simulation results suggest that substantial reductions in consumption, production, growth, and welfare occur where regulators focus on static efficiency issues by setting prices at or near marginal cost.