993 resultados para Sombart, Werner, 1863-1941.


Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

"William Belden Noble lectures"--Half t.p.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

"Dates of the publication of Charles Darwin's books and of the principal events in his life": p. [xiii]-xvii.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Each plate accompanied by guard sheet with descriptive letterpress.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

"List of works referred to in the text" : v. 1, p. [415]-440; v. 2, p. [581]-608 ; v. 3, p. [592]-639 ; v. 4, p. [471]-521.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

"Published at the expenses of the Carlsberg fund."

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Alfred Goldschmidt

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Alfred Graetzer

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

pa.

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The life and work of Werner Sombart poses an intellectual puzzle in the genealogy of modern social theorists. During his lifetime, Sombart was probably the most influential and prominent social scientist in Germany as well as in many other countries. Today he is among the least known social scientists. Why did he lose his status as one of the most brilliant and influential scholars and intellectuals of the 20th century? Why is his work almost forgotten today? While Weber's thesis about the influence of Protestantism on the development of capitalism is widely known, even beyond sociological circles, few sociologists today know that Sombart had an alternative explanation. An obvious explanation for Sombart's fall from grace is his embrace of Nazism. As Heidegger provides a counter-example, Sombart's fate requires a more complex explanation. In addition, we explore the different reception of his work in economic and sociological circles as compared to cultural theory and history. © 2001, SAGE Publications. All rights reserved.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Digital Image

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

In 1859, Queensland was separated from New South Wales as an independent colony. At this time the new Governor conspired to ensure the citizens did not inherit the old colonies system of full male suffrage. This was not returned until the Elections Act of 1872. However, the extended franchise was not a result of either democratic values or other ideological intentions. This article will analyse parliamentary debates to show that the revision to full suffrage was a result of administrative expediency driven by an inability to prevent abuse of the limited franchise.