Language and interdisciplinarity

Since language is multifaceted and heterogeneous, interdisciplinarity is natural to linguistic studies. In this article, after demonstrating that, I present two basic ways of doing science. One is ruled by the principle of exclusion, whereas the other is ruled by the principle of participation. The former leads to specialization, whereas the latter leads to the surpassing of specialization. From that, I discuss the advantages and problems of disciplinarity, and present the reasons why nowadays interdisciplinarity is a positive universal in scientific and pedagogical discourses. Also, based on etymology, I discuss the concepts of interdisciplinarity, multidisciplinarity, pluridisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity. Finally, I examine the bonds between linguistics and other sciences, by drawing a brief history of the relations between linguistics and literature in Brazil.

Modern scientific methods and their potential in wastewater science and technology

Application of novel analytical and investigative methods such as fluorescence in situ hybridization, confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), microelectrodes and advanced numerical simulation has led to new insights into micro-and macroscopic processes in bioreactors. However, the question is still open whether or not these new findings and the subsequent gain of knowledge are of significant practical relevance and if so, where and how. To find suitable answers it is necessary for engineers to know what can be expected by applying these modern analytical tools. Similarly, scientists could benefit significantly from an intensive dialogue with engineers in order to find out about practical problems and conditions existing in wastewater treatment systems. In this paper, an attempt is made to help bridge the gap between science and engineering in biological wastewater treatment. We provide an overview of recently developed methods in microbiology and in mathematical modeling and numerical simulation. A questionnaire is presented which may help generate a platform from which further technical and scientific developments can be accomplished. Both the paper and the questionnaire are aimed at encouraging scientists and engineers to enter into an intensive, mutually beneficial dialogue. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Neonatal respiratory therapy in the new millennium: Does clinical practice reflect scientific evidence?

Respiratory therapy has historically been considered the primary role of the physiotherapist in neonatal intensive care in Australia. In 2001 a survey was undertaken of all level three neonatal intensive care units in Australia to determine the role of the physiotherapist and of respiratory therapy in clinical practice. It appears that respiratory therapy is provided infrequently, with the number of infants treated per month ranging from 0 to 10 in 15 of the 20 units who provide respiratory therapy, regardless of therapist availability. The median number of respiratory treatments per month during the week was three, and on weekends it was one. Respiratory therapy was carried out by physiotherapists and nurses in 54.6% of units, by physiotherapists only in 36.4% of units, and by nurses only in the remaining 9% of units surveyed. There was also a diminution of the role of respiratory therapy in the extubation of premature infants. A review of the literature shows that overall the use of respiratory therapy reflects current evidence. The question remains whether it is possible to maintain the competency of staff and justify the cost of training in the current healthcare economic climate. It seems probable that the future role of physiotherapists in neonatal intensive care unit may be in the facilitation of optimal neurological development of surviving very low birth weight infants.

Os espaços/tempos da pesquisa sobre o professor

Analisa como a questão do professor se apresenta na produção científica brasileira. Toma como base o discurso apresentado na SBPC, por, entre outros fatores, ser originário de entidade que congrega cientistas de todas as áreas de conhecimento e ser representativo da produção docente e discente de graduação e pós-graduação das várias regiões e instituições do país. Usa como metodologia a abordagem histórico-documental. Utiliza como fontes os resumos publicados nos anais de 2001 e da década de 1980. Os resultados evidenciam: 1) um aumento extraordinário do número de trabalhos sobre o professor, a permanência da origem institucional (universidade pública) e territorial (Sudeste); 2) alteração do predomínio do enfoque temático, da formação do professor, em nível superior e médio, para a prática pedagógica exercida no cotidiano escolar do ensino fundamental; 3) alteração no enfoque metodológico, passando dos estudos exploratório-descritivos para a pesquisa-ação crítica voltada para a intervenção no cotidiano escolar do ensino fundamental. Conclui pela negação dos espaços/tempos da produção científica sobre o professor, visto que os espaços/tempos são ações de sujeitos históricos, que exibem operações de troca, intercâmbios, compartilhamentos coletivos e não a determinação do "lugar próprio" do pesquisador e/ou da "autoria marcada". Os discursos expressos pareceram, cada um, ocupar um "lugar próprio" e isolado, não permitindo a sua acepção como conjunto da obra sobre a questão do professor, não se vislumbrando uma tessitura temática coletiva, com gênese nos espaços/tempos da academia em sua relação com a realidade educacional e social do Brasil.