Ideas fundamentales del liberalismo político de John Rawls

Ideas fundamentales del liberalismo político de John Rawls. Rawls, John, El liberalismo político, Barcelona: Crítica S.L., 1996, (CONFERENCIA I).

Las facultades de los ciudadanos y su representación en el liberalismo político de John Rawls

Las facultades de los ciudadanos y su reresentación en el liberalismo político. (CONFERENCIA II).

El constructivismo político de John Rawls

Preguntas guias para la comprensión del constructivismo político empleado por Rawls en El liberalismo político

La idea del consenso entrecruzado en el liberalismo político de John Rawls

Guía de comprensión y lectura del concepto de consenso entrecruzado y su papel en el conjunto de la obra de John Rawls

La primacía de lo justo y las ideas sobre el bien en el liberalismo político de John Rawls

Guía de estudio para entender el concepto de la primacía de lo justo en John Rawls y las cinco ideas sobre el bien qeu se emplean en el liberalismo político de John Rawls.

La idea de una razón pública en el liberalismo político de John Rawls

Guía de lectura y estudio sobre el concepto de razón pública en Rawls

La estructura básica en el liberalismo político de John Rawls

Estudio y guía de lectura sobre el concepto de estructura básica en Rawls

La primacía de las libertades básicas en el liberalismo político de John Rawls

Estudio del tratamiento de las libertades básicas en el liberalismo poítico de John Rawls. guía de lectura de conferencia VIII de El liberalismo político de John Rawls

El liberalismo político de John Rawls ante el hecho del pluralismo

El pluralismo como punto de partida en el pensamiento político de John Rawls. El acercamiento al pluralismo doctrinal desde la perspectiva rawlsiana.

Uma justificação coerentista dos direitos humanos em Rawls

The aim of this paper is to identify how the ethical-political foundation of human rights in John Rawls’s theory of justice makes use of a coherentist model of moral justification in which cognitivism, liberalism, pluralism, non-foundationalism, and mitigated intuititionism stand out, leading to a pragmatic model of foundation with public justification in The Law of Peoples (LP). The main idea is to think about the reasonableness of the universal defence of human rights as primary goods with the aspects follows: its political nature, not metaphysical; its theoretical coherentist model, non-foundationalist; its pragmatic function and its public justification.

O aprimoramento cognitivo como bem primário em Rawls

The main thesis to be demonstrated in this work is that cognitive enhancement through the use of drugs can be included as a primary good within Rawls' thinking. To develop such notion, the text is structured in two parts. The first part intends to describe the theory of justice as equity in its elements directly related to primary goods. The first information to be verified is the unity of the notion of primary goods in all of Rawls' work. Some elements are modified, for example the distinction of natural and social primary goods. Natural primary goods are intelligence, health, imagination, vigor and chance (luck) and social primary goods are law and liberty, opportunity and power, income and wealth and the social fundaments of self-respect. The perception of some talents such as intelligence has also undergone changes, being altered from "higher intelligence" to "educated intelligence". Such fact highlights education as a primary good that permeates all of Rawls' work in different perspectives. Freedom and self-respect are social-primary goods that will also be deepened. The second part presents the definition of improvement and as to show that the distinction between enhancement and treatment is controversial. The part presents the definition of improvement and as the distinction between enhancement and treatment is controversial. Thus, we have deepened the problems related to practice improvement (enhancement) showing how the concepts of Rawls' primary goods as freedom and self-respect are not in opposition to the practice of improvement, particularly cognitive enhancement. We have shown, instead, that the ban of cognitive improvement could lead to denial of these primary goods. But how could we consider cognitive improvement as a primary social good? What we have done in this thesis is to show how cognitive enhancement is important to ensure that primary products are accessible to citizens, and we rebuilt the process that Rawls uses for choosing his primary goods to test that cognitive enhancement through drugs could perfectly be introduced as such.