Something moves: a philosophical and ethical praise to the combat practicing as art and education

In this work we tried to produce a philosophic-ethic praise to the Martial Arts` combat practice, based in our years of Martial Arts training accompanied with studies of oriental and occidental Philosophy. Tracing a critical history of the changes happened to the Martial Arts we brought the concept of combat as a martial practice of life empowerment. Opposing this, we presented the notion of fight as a result of the capture that the war arts suffered because of the despotic empires. Besides, we demonstrated that the combat practice is simultaneously an artistic and educational activity, because it aims at the production of an immanence field witch is loyal to the event.

Understanding the practical sense of health actions: contributions of Philosophical Hermeneutics

Health actions have a powerful tech no-scientific armory invested in their instrumental success. Conversely, they have a fragile conceptual basis for the understanding and transformation of the practical sense of health-disease-care processes that especifically take place nowadays. This essay intends to identify the potential contributions of philosophical hermeneutics to overcome such fragility. With this purpose and through contemporary hermeneutics, the recovery of the aristotelian distinction between theory, technique and praxis and its repercussions is discussed, for a systematic treatment of the practical reason of health actions. Against this backdrop, the following stands out: the dialogic essence of understanding-interpreting human acts; the fusion of horizons as the movement of realization of those processes of understanding; and happiness projects, existential guide to everyday life, as the impulse and the possibility of openness of the reason to the practical sense of health actions.

Taxonomic theory and the ICF: Foundations for a unified disability athletics classification

Development of a unified classification system to replace four of the systems currently used in disability athletics (i.e., track and field) has been widely advocated. The definition and purpose of classification, underpinned by taxonomic principles and collectively endorsed by relevant disability sport organizations, have not been developed but are required for successful implementation of a unified system. It is posited that the International classification of functioning. disability, and health (ICF), published by the World Health Organization (2001), and current disability athletics systems are, fundamentally, classifications of the functioning and disability associated with health conditions and are highly interrelated. A rationale for basing a unified disability athletics system on ICF is established. Following taxonomic analysis of the current systems, the definition and purpose of a unified disability athletics classification are proposed and discussed. The proposed taxonomic framework and definitions have implications for other disability sport classification systems.

Communicating with the community about grieving: A description and review of the foundations of a broken leg analogy of grieving

With loss permeating the lives of all people throughout the entire life span and its potential for serious long-term deleterious effects, providing effective care for those experiencing situations of loss would be an important element of any preventive community-based mental health promotion approach. The low use of mental health services by those confronted with loss, and the lack of such services in many areas, makes it imperative to enhance the competency of the broader community to provide appropriate care during times of loss. Contributory to such care is a sound knowledge of the literature concerning loss and grieving. The broken leg analogy of grief presented in this article integrates the traditional and emerging grief theories and empirical evidence into an analogy of grieving that can be easily communicated to the general community, is relevant to many losses. and vet upholds the differing positions concerning grieving held by various schools of psychiatric thought.

Sociological and philosophical aspects of human interaction with technology: advancing concepts

It is not possible to imagine our lives today without technology. From the moment we get up in the morning until the time that we go to bed at night, technology is present in almost every moment, even if we are not aware of it. Some of the most basic activities we need to perform regularly could not be carried out without technology. Sociological and Philosophical Aspects of Human Interaction with Technology: Advancing Concepts presents a careful blend of conceptual, theoretical and applied research in regards to the relationship between technology and humans. This book explores the importance of these interactions, aspects related with trust, communication, data protection, usability concerning organizational change, and e-learning. The advancement of these theories and practices will benefit from this publication as it provides a voice for the users.

Feyerabend

É objectivo desta dissertação sobre Teoria e Incomensurabilidade em Feyerabend, aprofundar o conhecimento da problemática, da interpretação de teorias científicas e o contexto da sua emergência e configuração, tal como é dada a ler nos primeiros ensaios. Consideraram-se para o efeito, relevantes, sobretudo, as fontes primárias, em que tal temática é avaliada. O primeiro capítulo estrutura-se a partir de Realism and Historicity of Knowledge, escrito a pensar em Bohr, porque este ensaio, embora posterior, sintetiza os problemas que se levantam às tradições abstractas quando procuram acomodar o progresso científico, esquecendo a história. Assinalámos assim o fundo de tensão de que emerge o problema da avaliação do potencial heurístico das teorias científicas. Mobilizámos Knowledge without Foundations, por parecer incontornável a matriz popperiana da recusa fundacionalista que nesse período projectava, e Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations por levantar os problemas da pragmática do saber científico a partir da discussão dos jogos de linguagem e dos seus lances, porque os considerámos estruturantes. No segundo capítulo procurámos desenvolver o tema da incomensurabilidade entre teorias não instanciais sucessivas mobilizando para o efeito os ensaios onde nos pareceu ser dominante a análise e a perspectivação histórica do debate dialéctico (positivismo/realismo) acerca dos problemas decorrentes das interacções entre teoria e experiência, teoria e observação, teoria e linguagem corrente e teoria e prática científica como é o caso em Attempt at a Realistic Interpretation of Experience, em que avança a Tese I e expõe o irrealismo da tese da estabilidade e a irrelevância das mudanças no emprego de termos científicos na linguagem corrente, por força de mutações ocorridas na supra estrutura teórica. Desenvolvemos também a partir de Explanation, Reduction and Empiricism, os problemas e as dificuldades da interpretação de teorias científicas decorrentes da pretensão ortodoxa de justificação formal de redução e explicação de teorias gerais, desenvolvida quer na teoria da redução de Nagel, quer na teoria da explicação de Hempel e Oppenheim . Encerramos o capítulo com o problemas da testabilidade de teorias científicas e a solução que a adopção, quer do princípio da proliferação, quer de alternativas fortes, introduziria. O terceiro capítulo enfatiza, para lá dos consensos partilhados e das diferenças assumidas, a importância das contribuições de Feyerabend, Kuhn e Lakatos para a problematização das teses do neopositivismo, do racionalismo crítico e do falsificacionismo na história e filosofia da ciência.

Reason Maintenance Systems: Tools for Foundations-based Belief Revision

Dynamic and distributed environments are hard to model since they suffer from unexpected changes, incomplete knowledge, and conflicting perspectives and, thus, call for appropriate knowledge representation and reasoning (KRR) systems. Such KRR systems must handle sets of dynamic beliefs, be sensitive to communicated and perceived changes in the environment and, consequently, may have to drop current beliefs in face of new findings or disregard any new data that conflicts with stronger convictions held by the system. Not only do they need to represent and reason with beliefs, but also they must perform belief revision to maintain the overall consistency of the knowledge base. One way of developing such systems is to use reason maintenance systems (RMS). In this paper we provide an overview of the most representative types of RMS, which are also known as truth maintenance systems (TMS), which are computational instances of the foundations-based theory of belief revision. An RMS module works together with a problem solver. The latter feeds the RMS with assumptions (core beliefs) and conclusions (derived beliefs), which are accompanied by their respective foundations. The role of the RMS module is to store the beliefs, associate with each belief (core or derived belief) the corresponding set of supporting foundations and maintain the consistency of the overall reasoning by keeping, for each represented belief, the current supporting justifications. Two major approaches are used to reason maintenance: single-and multiple-context reasoning systems. Although in the single-context systems, each belief is associated to the beliefs that directly generated it—the justification-based TMS (JTMS) or the logic-based TMS (LTMS), in the multiple context counterparts, each belief is associated with the minimal set of assumptions from which it can be inferred—the assumption-based TMS (ATMS) or the multiple belief reasoner (MBR).

Financial reporting by European foundations

A Work Project, presented as part of the requirements for the Award of a Masters Degree in Finance from the NOVA – School of Business and Economics

Transparency in financial reporting by European Foundations

The increasing role of the European Foundations, urges for more transparency. The prevalent accounting frameworks in which they operate and report their activities are mostly based on national laws. This lack of harmonization, limits comparison between European foundations. Thus, this Work Project analyzes the current financial reporting by European foundations, and evaluates the similarities, differences and data availability between countries. The research provides evidence about little information available, deficiency in the financial reporting, within and between countries. The research recommends the need to ensure uniformity by providing a clear definition for public-benefit purpose, harmonization of laws and financial reporting.

Concepções e práticas do trabalho da equipe multidisciplinar diante das crianças com necessidades educacionais especiais

Dissertação de mestrado em Educação Especial (área de especialização em Dificuldades de Aprendizagem Específicas)

Companies' OHS internal structures: Types and theoretical foundations

An organization manages to regulate, standardize and optimize its operations in a way that places health and safety first by considering Health, Safety, Environment and Ergonomics (HSEE). In order to provide a theoretical foundation for Companies’ Occupational Health and Safety Internal Structures (COHSIS) allowing the focus on safety, COHSIS and its fundamentals were reviewed and described based on a brief literature review, which have included both papers published in journals, as well as works made available by selected organizations with mature safety culture. Three COHSIS were defined for description of its fundamentals, enabling improve the usability of its terminologies and provide the mentioned theoretical foundation.