SEVERE HEAD TRAUMA, EMERGENCY TRANSPORT, AND PATIENT OUTCOME

Trauma and severe head injuries are important issues because they are prevalent, because they occur predominantly in the young, and because variations in clinical management may matter. Trauma is the leading cause of death for those under age 40. The focus of this head injury study is to determine if variations in time from the scene of accident to a trauma center hospital makes a difference in patient outcomes.^ A trauma registry is maintained in the Houston-Galveston area and includes all patients admitted to any one of three trauma center hospitals with mild or severe head injuries. A study cohort, derived from the Registry, includes 254 severe head injury cases, for 1980, with a Glasgow Coma Score of 8 or less.^ Multiple influences relate to patient outcomes from severe head injury. Two primary variables and four confounding variables are identified, including time to emergency room, time to intubation, patient age, severity of injury, type of injury and mode of transport to the emergency room. Regression analysis, analysis of variance, and chi-square analysis were the principal statistical methods utilized.^ Analysis indicates that within an urban setting, with a four-hour time span, variations in time to emergency room do not provide any strong influence or predictive value to patient outcome. However, data are suggestive that at longer time periods there is a negative influence on outcomes. Age is influential only when the older group (55-64) is included. Mode of transport (helicopter or ambulance) did not indicate any significant difference in outcome.^ In a multivariate regression model, outcomes are influenced primarily by severity of injury and age which explain 36% (R('2)) of variance. Inclusion of time to emergency room, time to intubation, transport mode and type injury add only 4% (R('2)) additional contribution to explaining variation in patient outcome.^ The research concludes that since the group most at risk to head trauma is the young adult male involved in automobile/motorcycle accidents, more may be gained by modifying driving habits and other preventive measures. Continuous clinical and evaluative research are required to provide updated clinical wisdom in patient management and trauma treatment protocols. A National Institute of Trauma may be required to develop a national public policy and evaluate the many medical, behavioral and social changes required to cope with the country's number 3 killer and the primary killer of young adults.^

Data quality in trauma transfusion studies and the impact of missing data on predicting massive transfusion

Maximizing data quality may be especially difficult in trauma-related clinical research. Strategies are needed to improve data quality and assess the impact of data quality on clinical predictive models. This study had two objectives. The first was to compare missing data between two multi-center trauma transfusion studies: a retrospective study (RS) using medical chart data with minimal data quality review and the PRospective Observational Multi-center Major Trauma Transfusion (PROMMTT) study with standardized quality assurance. The second objective was to assess the impact of missing data on clinical prediction algorithms by evaluating blood transfusion prediction models using PROMMTT data. RS (2005-06) and PROMMTT (2009-10) investigated trauma patients receiving ≥ 1 unit of red blood cells (RBC) from ten Level I trauma centers. Missing data were compared for 33 variables collected in both studies using mixed effects logistic regression (including random intercepts for study site). Massive transfusion (MT) patients received ≥ 10 RBC units within 24h of admission. Correct classification percentages for three MT prediction models were evaluated using complete case analysis and multiple imputation based on the multivariate normal distribution. A sensitivity analysis for missing data was conducted to estimate the upper and lower bounds of correct classification using assumptions about missing data under best and worst case scenarios. Most variables (17/33=52%) had <1% missing data in RS and PROMMTT. Of the remaining variables, 50% demonstrated less missingness in PROMMTT, 25% had less missingness in RS, and 25% were similar between studies. Missing percentages for MT prediction variables in PROMMTT ranged from 2.2% (heart rate) to 45% (respiratory rate). For variables missing >1%, study site was associated with missingness (all p≤0.021). Survival time predicted missingness for 50% of RS and 60% of PROMMTT variables. MT models complete case proportions ranged from 41% to 88%. Complete case analysis and multiple imputation demonstrated similar correct classification results. Sensitivity analysis upper-lower bound ranges for the three MT models were 59-63%, 36-46%, and 46-58%. Prospective collection of ten-fold more variables with data quality assurance reduced overall missing data. Study site and patient survival were associated with missingness, suggesting that data were not missing completely at random, and complete case analysis may lead to biased results. Evaluating clinical prediction model accuracy may be misleading in the presence of missing data, especially with many predictor variables. The proposed sensitivity analysis estimating correct classification under upper (best case scenario)/lower (worst case scenario) bounds may be more informative than multiple imputation, which provided results similar to complete case analysis.^

Increased mRNA levels for components of the lysosomal, Ca2+-activated, and ATP-ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic pathways in skeletal muscle from head trauma patients.

The cellular mechanisms responsible for enhanced muscle protein breakdown in hospitalized patients, which frequently results in lean body wasting, are unknown. To determine whether the lysosomal, Ca2+-activated, and ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathways are activated, we measured mRNA levels for components of these processes in muscle biopsies from severe head trauma patients. These patients exhibited negative nitrogen balance and increased rates of whole-body protein breakdown (assessed by [13C]leucine infusion) and of myofibrillar protein breakdown (assessed by 3-methylhistidine urinary excretion). Increased muscle mRNA levels for cathepsin D, m-calpain, and critical components of the ubiquitin proteolytic pathway (i.e., ubiquitin, the 14-kDa ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2, and proteasome subunits) paralleled these metabolic adaptations. The data clearly support a role for multiple proteolytic processes in increased muscle proteolysis. The ubiquitin proteolytic pathway could be activated by altered glucocorticoid production and/or increased circulating levels of interleukin 1beta and interleukin 6 observed in head trauma patients and account for the breakdown of myofibrillar proteins, as was recently reported in animal studies.

Avaliação da capacidade funcional de pacientes vítimas de trauma um ano após alta hospitalar

Objetivos: Avaliar a capacidade funcional de pacientes vítimas de trauma um ano após alta hospitalar e verificar associação da capacidade funcional com fatores relacionados ao trauma e à internação hospitalar. Metodologia: Estudo de coorte prospectivo, com pacientes vítimas de trauma grave (Injury Severity Score - ISS >=16), internados entre Junho e Setembro de 2010 em unidade de terapia intensiva (UTI) cirúrgica especializada em paciente politraumatizado de um hospital público de grande porte na cidade de São Paulo, Brasil. Variáveis de interesse como idade, sexo, escore de Glasgow, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Disease Classification System II (APACHE II), mecanismos de trauma, número de lesões, região corpórea afetada, número de cirurgias, duração da ventilação mecânica (VM) e tempo de internação hospitalar foram coletadas dos prontuários médicos. A capacidade funcional foi avaliada um ano após alta hospitalar utilizando as escalas Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) e Escala de Atividades Instrumentais de Vida Diária de Lawton (AIVDL). Os pacientes também foram questionados se haviam retornado ao trabalho ou estudo. Resultados: O seguimento um ano após trauma foi completo em 49 indivíduos, a maioria composta por jovens (36±11 anos), do sexo masculino (81,6%) e vítimas de acidentes de trânsito (71,5%). Cada indivíduo sofreu aproximadamente 4 lesões corporais, acarretando uma média no ISS de 31 ± 14,4. O traumatismo cranioencefálico foi o tipo de lesão mais comum (65,3%). De acordo com a GOS, a maioria dos pacientes apresentou disfunção moderada (43%) ou disfunção leve ou ausente (37%) um ano após o trauma. A escala AIVDL apresentou pontuação média de 12±4 com aproximadamente 60- 70% dos indivíduos capazes de realizar de forma independente a maioria das atividades avaliadas. Escore de Glasgow, APACHE II, duração da VM e tempo de internação hospitalar foram associadas com a capacidade funcional um ano após lesão. A regressão linear múltipla considerando todas as variáveis significativas revelou associação entre a pontuação da escala AIVDL e o tempo de internação hospitalar. Apenas 32,6% dos indivíduos retornaram ao trabalho ou estudo. Conclusões: A maioria dos pacientes vítimas de trauma grave foi capaz de realizar as atividades avaliadas com independência; apenas um terço deles retornou ao trabalho e/ou estudo um ano após alta hospitalar. O tempo de internação hospitalar foi revelado como preditor significativo para a recuperação da capacidade funcional um ano após lesão grave

Predictors of Nasal Obstruction: Quantification and Assessment Using Multiple Grading Scales

Objective. To evaluate the association between nasal obstruction and (1) demographic factors, (2) medical history, (3) physical tests, and (4) nasal exam findings. Study Design. CASE SERIES: Methods. Chart review at a tertiary medical center. Results. Two hundred-forty consecutive patients (52.1 ± 17.5 years old, with a Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score of 32.0 ± 24.1) were included. Demographic factors and inferior turbinate sizes were not associated with NOSE score or Nasal Obstruction Visual Analog Scale (NO-VAS). A significant association was found between higher NOSE score on univariate analysis and positive history of nasal trauma (p = 0.0136), allergic rhinitis (p < 0.0001), use of nasal steroids (p = 0.0108), higher grade of external nasal deformity (p = 0.0149), higher internal nasal septal deviation grade (p = 0.0024), and narrow internal nasal valve angle (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified the following as independent predictors of high NOSE score: NO-VAS: ≥50 (Odds Ratio (OR) = 17.6 (95% CI 5.83-61.6), p < 0.0001), external nasal deformity: grades 2-4 (OR = 4.63 (95% CI 1.14-19.9), p = 0.0339), and allergic rhinitis: yes (OR = 5.5 (95% CI 1.77-18.7), p = 0.0041). Conclusion. Allergic rhinitis, NO-VAS score ≥ 50, and external nasal deformity (grades 2-4) were statistically significant independent predictors of high NOSE scores on multivariate analysis. Inferior turbinate size was not associated with NOSE scores or NO-VAS.

"I'm a better manager":A biographic narrative study of the impact of personal trauma on the professional lives of managers in the UK

This doctoral study aims to understand how experiences of critical illness or bereavement affect the way managers view and approach their work and their relationships at work. This is an interpretative phenomenological study examining the subjective meanings of personal experience and is underpinned by biographic narratives from four participants and interviews with their nominated workplace witnesses (i.e. colleagues who worked alongside the individual at the time of their trauma). As a consequence of the findings that have emerged across this study, three contributions to theory are presented. All four participants described their traumas as a professional growth experience for themselves as managers, which resulted in self-reported and observed behaviour change at work. Consequently, the first area of theoretical contribution is a suggested extension to the post-traumatic growth (PTG) framework (Calhoun & Tedeschi, 2006) with the addition of a new behavioural dimension called ‘managerial growth’, when applied to the context of ‘ordinary’ organizations. The second area of theoretical contribution arose through the reflexive process that was created during data collection where participants and their witnesses remembered episodes of compassion interaction at work. The second area of contribution thus seeks to extend the existing model of compassion at work (Dutton, Worline, Frost and Lilius, 2006), by conceptualising compassion as a dyadic process between a compassion ‘giver’ and a compassion ‘receiver’ in which the compassion receiver ‘trusts or ‘mistrusts’; ‘discloses’ or ‘withholds’; ‘connects’ or ‘disconnects’ with the compassion giver. The third area of contribution is a new conceptualisation of reflexivity, ‘three-dimensional reflexivity’ (3DR) (Armstrong, Butler and Shaw, 2013). 3DR brings together three of the elements that have been missing from critically reflexive management research; by working with multiple variants of reflexivity in the same study; surfacing different reflexive voices to guard against the researcher’s (potentially) solipsistic own; and remaining sensitive to the concept of reflexive time. In doing so, 3DR not only provides a deeper understanding of individual lived experience; it is also a vehicle in which self-insight is gained. Furthermore, by engaging in its practice, those involved in this study have developed both personally and professionally as a result.

Restoring function after neuromuscular trauma: novel paradigms for enhancing volitional control of neural activity in untethered environments and vHAB, a gamified therapy platform

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2016-08

Trauma in critically ill children : transfusion and osmotherapy practices

Les accidents sont la cause la plus fréquente de décès chez l’enfant, la plupart du temps à cause d’un traumatisme cranio-cérébrale (TCC) sévère ou d’un choc hémorragique. Malgré cela, la prise en charge de ces patients est souvent basée sur la littérature adulte. Le mannitol et le salin hypertonique (3%) sont des traitements standards dans la gestion de l’hypertension intracrânienne, mais il existe très peu d’évidence sur leur utilité en pédiatrie. Nous avons entrepris une revue rétrospective des traumatismes crâniens sévères admis dans les sept dernières années, pour décrire l’utilisation de ces agents hyperosmolaires et leurs effets sur la pression intracrânienne. Nous avons établi que le salin hypertonique est plus fréquemment utilisé que le mannitol, qu’il ne semble pas y avoir de facteurs associés à l’utilisation de l’un ou l’autre, et que l’effet sur la pression intracrânienne est difficile à évaluer en raison de multiples co-interventions. Il faudra mettre en place un protocole de gestion du patient avec TCC sévère avant d’entreprendre des études prospectives. La transfusion sanguine est employée de façon courante dans la prise en charge du patient traumatisé. De nombreuses études soulignent les effets néfastes des transfusions sanguines suggérant des seuils transfusionnels plus restrictifs. Malgré cela, il n’y a pas de données sur les transfusions chez l’enfant atteint de traumatismes graves. Nous avons donc entrepris une analyse post-hoc d’une grosse étude prospective multicentrique sur les pratiques transfusionnelles des enfants traumatisés. Nous avons conclu que les enfants traumatisés sont transfusés de manière importante avant et après l’admission aux soins intensifs. Un jeune âge, un PELOD élevé et le recours à la ventilation mécanique sont des facteurs associés à recevoir une transfusion sanguine aux soins intensifs. Le facteur le plus prédicteur, demeure le fait de recevoir une transfusion avant l’admission aux soins, élément qui suggère probablement un saignement continu. Il demeure qu’une étude prospective spécifique des patients traumatisés doit être effectuée pour évaluer si une prise en charge basée sur un seuil transfusionnel restrictif serait sécuritaire dans cette population.

Trauma in critically ill children : transfusion and osmotherapy practices

Les accidents sont la cause la plus fréquente de décès chez l’enfant, la plupart du temps à cause d’un traumatisme cranio-cérébrale (TCC) sévère ou d’un choc hémorragique. Malgré cela, la prise en charge de ces patients est souvent basée sur la littérature adulte. Le mannitol et le salin hypertonique (3%) sont des traitements standards dans la gestion de l’hypertension intracrânienne, mais il existe très peu d’évidence sur leur utilité en pédiatrie. Nous avons entrepris une revue rétrospective des traumatismes crâniens sévères admis dans les sept dernières années, pour décrire l’utilisation de ces agents hyperosmolaires et leurs effets sur la pression intracrânienne. Nous avons établi que le salin hypertonique est plus fréquemment utilisé que le mannitol, qu’il ne semble pas y avoir de facteurs associés à l’utilisation de l’un ou l’autre, et que l’effet sur la pression intracrânienne est difficile à évaluer en raison de multiples co-interventions. Il faudra mettre en place un protocole de gestion du patient avec TCC sévère avant d’entreprendre des études prospectives. La transfusion sanguine est employée de façon courante dans la prise en charge du patient traumatisé. De nombreuses études soulignent les effets néfastes des transfusions sanguines suggérant des seuils transfusionnels plus restrictifs. Malgré cela, il n’y a pas de données sur les transfusions chez l’enfant atteint de traumatismes graves. Nous avons donc entrepris une analyse post-hoc d’une grosse étude prospective multicentrique sur les pratiques transfusionnelles des enfants traumatisés. Nous avons conclu que les enfants traumatisés sont transfusés de manière importante avant et après l’admission aux soins intensifs. Un jeune âge, un PELOD élevé et le recours à la ventilation mécanique sont des facteurs associés à recevoir une transfusion sanguine aux soins intensifs. Le facteur le plus prédicteur, demeure le fait de recevoir une transfusion avant l’admission aux soins, élément qui suggère probablement un saignement continu. Il demeure qu’une étude prospective spécifique des patients traumatisés doit être effectuée pour évaluer si une prise en charge basée sur un seuil transfusionnel restrictif serait sécuritaire dans cette population.