Cooperative research and development agreement with Ford Motor Company : environmental damage to automobile coatings.

Mode of access: Internet.

An evaluation of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards for passenger car steering assemblies. Standard 203 - impact protection for the driver. Standard 204 - rearward column displacement.

Mode of access: Internet.

16th census of the United States: 1940. Census of business: 1939. Retail trade. Commodity sales: motor-vehicle dealers (new); accessory, tire, battery dealers; used-car dealers.

At head of title: U.S. Dept. of Commerce. Jesse H. Jones, Secretary. Bureau of the Census. J.C. Capt, Director ..

Program evaluation support for the motor vehicle diagnostic inspection demonstration projects. Volume I: used car owner survey. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Sate Vehicle Programs, Washington D. C.

Honda Motor Company's CVCC engine. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C.

Report to the President by the Emergency Board appointed January 14, 1948 pursuant to section 10 of the Railway labor act, as amended, to investigate unadjusted disputes between the Chicago, North Shore and Milwaukee Railway Company and certain of its employees represented by International Union of Amalgamated Association of Street Electric Railway and Motor Coach Employees of America, a labor organization.

Signed, Harry H. Schwartz, chairman, Russell Wolfe, Robert E. Stone.

The market for wood pallets in the auto industry : a case study of Ford Motor Company /

Cover title.

Operator, organizational, direct, and general support maintenance manual : compressor, air, reciprocating, electric motor driven, receiver mounted, 15 cfm at 175 psi (12.30 kgs per sq cm) (Champion Pneumatic Machinery Company) model no. HR5-8M-3, NSN 4310-00-537-8876.

Includes index.

Packard Motor Co. test touring car and three drivers

Photo album title: Three Men in a Six. President H. B. Joy; Chief Engineer Russell Huff; General Superintendent B. F. Roberts

Ford Motor Company Visitor Reception Center, Dearborn, Michigan, 1971 (unbuilt project)

[Conceptual Sketch of Scheme 1], untitled. Ink sketch on white paper, 8 1/2 x 11 inches [from photographic copy by Lance Burgharrdt]

Motor and Cars of the Ypsilanti and Ann Arbor Street Railway. - Showing Military Company

Streetcars. On verso: Train and Military Company from Nov. 1895 MichStoner, Claude Thomas, 1899-1977igan Central Magazine, "Headlight"

Should we debrief and counsel people who have had psychological shock?

Design: Randomised controlled trial of psychological debriefing. Setting: A British teaching hospital (the Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford). Patients: 66 men and 40 women, aged 17–69 years, admitted to hospital after a motor vehicle accident. Most had been the driver of a car. Median admission duration was four days for the 52 control patients and eight days for the 54 who underwent the intervention. Interventions: A debriefing of about one hour on Day 2 of admission, encouraging patients to describe the accident and express their emotions, followed by a cognitive appraisal which included describing common reactions to traumatic experiences and suggesting a range of people who might be able to assist in the future, including the patient's general practitioner. 91 patients were assessed at four months and 61 were assessed at three years. Control patients had no debriefing or counselling. Main outcome measures: Impact of Event Scale (IES, which focuses on intrusive thoughts and avoidance of similar situations to the event); Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI, a measure of 53 symptoms); and other questions related to physical pain and functional activities. Main results: At four months there was still considerable psychological morbidity among the patients who were followed up. There was a significant difference (P < 0.05) in changes of IES between the 42 who received the intervention, in whom it increased from 15 (standard deviation [SD], 15) to 16 (SD, 15), and the 49 controls, in whom it fell from 15 (SD, 12) to 13 (SD, 14). Similarly, two subscales of the BSI score changed significantly between the intervention group, among whom it deteriorated from 0.5 (SD, 0.5) to 0.6 (SD, 0.8), and the control s, in whom it hardly changed from 0.4 (SD, 0.3) to 0.4 (SD, 0.4). Among the 61 patients followed for three years, the 30 randomised to receive the intervention were significantly worse, by self-report, both psychologically and physically. Their mean IES score deteriorated from a baseline of 15 (SD, 14) to 16 (SD, 18). In comparison, scores for the 31 control patients improved from 16 (SD, 12) to 13 (SD, 17). The difference in change was significant (P < 0.05). Among all patients with high initial scores, these decreased among the controls but not among those receiving the intervention. Conclusion: Psychological counselling should only be used in the context of trials rather than routine care.