The Law reports : equity cases, including bankruptcy cases, before the Master of Rolls, the Vice-chancellors, and the Chief Judge in Bankruptcy /

Publisher varies: v. I-Ix, Printed for Council of Law Reporting.

A Catalogue of pamphlets, tracts, proclamations, speeches, sermons, trials, petitions, from 1506 to 1700, in the library of the Honourable Society of Lincoln's Inn

Mode of access: Internet.

The Law reports [of the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting] Equity cases, including bankruptcy cases, before the master of the rolls, the vice-chancellors, and the chief judge in bankruptcy.

Mode of access: Internet.

Argument of Samuel L. Southard : in the case of Stacy Decow and Joseph Hendrickson, versus Thomas L. Shotwell ; delivered at Trenton before the Court of Appeals of the State of New Jersey, at a special term in the eighth month, 1833 /

On appeal from the Court of Chancery. Dispute concerning a school fund of the Society of Friends, which was claimed by both Orthodox and Hicksite factions.

Reports, or Causes in Chancery [1557-1604]

Mode of access: Internet.

Calendar of the close rolls preserved in the Public Record Office : Edward I ; prepared under the superintendence of the Deputy Keeper of the Records.

Includes indexes.

An index to the Virginia reports, from Jefferson to 33rd Grattan, both inclusive. [1730-1880] With a complete table of cases.

"This book is an index to all the reported decisions of the Supreme Court of Appeals, of the General Court, and of the High Court of Chancery, of Virginia; and, also, of the decisions of the Special Court of Appeals reported in the two volumes of Patton, jr., and Heath's reports."--Pref.

Sweet & Maxwell's Guide to the legal profession : the London LL.B., the law clerks' certificates and to students' law books, with suggested courses of reading.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

A calendar of post mortem inquisitions relating to the county of Sussex, 1 to 25 Elizabeth.

Mode of access: Internet.

A digested index to the Virginia reports, containing all the points argued and determined in the Court of appeals of Virginia, from Washington to [third Leigh] ... inclusive [1790-1832] with a table of the names of the cases reported.

Mode of access: Internet.

Central reporter... : all cases determined in the courts of last resort.

"New York. Court of Appeals; New Jersey. Supreme Court. Court of Errors and Appeals, Court of Chancery and Prerogative Court; Pennsylvania. Supreme Court; Delaware. Superior Court, Court of Errors and Appeals and Court of Chancery; Maryland. Court of Appeals; District of Columbia. Supreme Court. From September, 1885."

The laws and jurisprudence of England and America : being a series of lectures delivered before Yale University /

"Being a series of lectures delivered before Yale University."--T.p.

Calendar of the Patent rolls preserved in the Public record office /

Prepared under the supervision of H.C. Maxwell Lyte. Text by R.F. Isaacson, vol. 1-15 (with G.J. Morris and H.E. Lawrence, vol. 1; C.B. Dawes, vol. 13-15); C.B. Dawes, vol. 16.

British Methodist Episcopal Church Tithing Ticket, 1874

A quarterly tithing ticket from the British Methodist Episcopal Church, signed by Walter Hawkins, Minister, issued on August 16, 1874. This ticket was in the possession of the Richard Bell Family of St. Catharines.Minister Walter Hawkins was Superintendent of the Conference for the British Methodist Episcopal Church (Brant Co.) This excerpt from the Dictionary of Canadian Biography Online describes his role in reestablishing the BMEC in Canada following a period of reunion with the African Methodist Episcopal Church, an initiative spearheaded by Richard Randolph Disney, a free-born black American Methodist preacher. "By the end of the 1870s the BMEC had 56 congregations with about 3,100 members, the bulk of the latter being in the Danish West Indies and British Guiana. Because mission work outside Canada had overtaxed the church's financial resources, in 1880 Disney began negotiations towards reunion with the AMEC. The reunion was effected that year, and it was overwhelmingly ratified at a BMEC convention held at Hamilton in June 1881. A referendum showed that although a majority in Ontario was opposed, 86 per cent of the membership was in favour. Disney was accepted as an AMEC bishop and was assigned to its Tenth Episcopal District, a region embracing his former territory as well as some of the AMEC churches in Canada which had not joined the BMEC. Reunification appeared to have been a triumph for Disney, but trouble soon occurred. A majority of the Ontario churches and preachers, led by the Reverend Walter Hawkins of Chatham, sought to re-establish the BMEC, fearing the loss of their distinctive identity and perhaps feeling that the Caribbean groups had exercised too much influence on the reunification question. In 1886 this group held an ecclesiastical council at Chatham, at which it was claimed that Disney had defected to the AMEC. At a subsequent general conference that year the BMEC was reconstituted. The conference deposed Disney, agreeing to "erase his name and ignore his authority, and cancel his official relationship as bishop." The conference minutes also refer to a court case instigated by Disney which reached the High Court of Chancery in Britain, but records of this case have not been located. The reconstituted BMEC elected Hawkins as its general superintendent, avoiding the title of bishop for several years." Source: Dictionary of Canadian Biography Online. Government of Canada.

Autonomia privada e licença para mentir : uma investigação sobre a possibilidade de limitação contratual da responsabilidade por dolo

A presente dissertação de mestrado tem por objetivo investigar se as partes de negócios jurídicos empresariais celebrados à luz do ordenamento jurídico brasileiro podem evocar a autonomia privada para, por meio da inserção no contrato de mecanismos importados da common law – como as declarações e garantias, as regras de indenização e limitação de responsabilidades (frequentemente acompanhadas de disposição de remédio exclusivo), as cláusulas de entendimento integral e os dispositivos de disclaimer of reliance –, estabelecer limites à responsabilidade extracontratual por dolo prevista no Código Civil e, assim, criar contratualmente verdadeira licença para mentir. Para tanto, dada a ausência de jurisprudência brasileira a esse respeito, parte-se da análise do caso Abry Partners V, L.P. v. F&W Acquisition LLC, C.A. No. 1756-N, examinado pela Court of Chancery do estado norte-americano de Delaware em 2006. Busca-se, então, compreender – com base na decisão proferida em tal caso e na doutrina estrangeira que sobre ela se debruçou – os efeitos pretendidos e obtidos, no âmbito da common law, pela inserção das cláusulas e mecanismos mencionados acima e, posteriormente, segue-se – de acordo com os princípios que regem a formação, a conclusão e a intepretação dos contratos comerciais no Brasil (tal como a boa-fé objetiva) – rumo ao exame de como o Poder Judiciário brasileiro tenderá a conduzir a acomodação e/ou adaptação de tais mecanismos e cláusulas ao direito pátrio.