Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy in older people: a Cochrane systematic review

Objective: To summarise the findings of an updated Cochrane review of interventions aimed at improving the appropriate use of polypharmacy in older people. Design: Cochrane systematic review. Multiple electronic databases were searched including MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (from inception to November 2013). Hand searching of references was also performed. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials, controlled before-and-after studies and interrupted time series analyses reporting on interventions targeting appropriate polypharmacy in older people in any healthcare setting were included if they used a validated measure of prescribing appropriateness. Evidence quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation).
Setting: All healthcare settings. 
Participants: Older people (≥65 years) with ≥1 long-term condition who were receiving polypharmacy (≥4 regular medicines).
Primary and secondary outcome measures: Primary outcomes were the change in prevalence of appropriate polypharmacy and hospital admissions. Medication-related problems (eg, adverse drug reactions), medication adherence and quality of life were included as secondary outcomes.
Results: 12 studies were included: 8 RCTs, 2 cluster RCTs and 2 controlled before-and-after studies. 1 study involved computerised decision support and 11 comprised pharmaceutical care approaches across various settings. Appropriateness was measured using validated tools, including the Medication Appropriateness Index, Beers’ criteria and Screening Tool of Older Person’s Prescriptions (STOPP)/ Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment (START). The interventions demonstrated a reduction in inappropriate prescribing. Evidence of effect on hospital admissions and medication-related problems was conflicting. No differences in health-related quality of life were reported.
Conclusions: The included interventions demonstrated improvements in appropriate polypharmacy based on reductions in inappropriate prescribing. However, it remains unclear if interventions resulted in clinically significant improvements (eg, in terms of hospital admissions). Future intervention studies would benefit from available guidance on intervention development, evaluation and reporting to facilitate replication in clinical practice.

Abordagem farmacoepidemiológica da terapêutica no idoso: um ensaio em meio hospitalar

Introdução: O envelhecimento demográfico e o aumento da esperança de vida, criam condições para uma maior incidência de doenças degenerativas. Vários aspectos críticos envolvem a medicação no idoso, tais como: polimedicação frequente, com risco acrescido de ocorrência de reacções adversas, relacionadas com interacções medicamentosas e eventual medicação desaconselhada, em que o risco pode ser superior ao benefício. Estes aspectos são particularmente críticos no idoso hospitalizado. Objectivo: Este estudo teve como objectivo estimar a prevalência da polimedicação em idosos hospitalizados e analisar a medicação considerada inadequada nesta população. Participantes e metodologia: Seguiu-se um modelo retrospectivo descritivo transversal, reportando-se os dados a um período de um ano e meio, incidindo sobre o último internamento. A natureza da medicação, foi analisada de acordo com o Formulário Terapêutico Nacional, Resumo das Caracteristicas do Medicamento e com critérios de Beers-2002.Englobou 100 idosos (>65 anos) utentes do Hospital Cuf Descobertas, em regime de internamento. Os dados pessoais e clínicos e respectivo mapa farmacoterapêutico, foram introduzidos em base de dados construída para este estudo, em Access 2003 SP2. Procedeu-se à analise estatística (SPSS 13,0), descritiva, com cálculo de medidas de tendência central; análise univariada para todas as variáveis relevantes e análise bi-variada para quantificar a prevalência da polimedicação por sexo e grupo etário. Resultados:Dos doentes estudados (65-98 anos), maioritariamente femininos, 7 apresentavam 4 patologias em simultâneo, 13:3 patologias, 27:2 patologias e 30:1 patologia. Em 23 não se verificou qualquer patologia crónica. A hipertensão (n=49:27,5%) e a patologia cardiovascular (n=41:23%) foram as mais frequentemente encontradas na amostra em estudo sendo as de menor frequência a patologia reumática (n=1:0,56%), a osteoporose e os problemas psíquicos (n=2:1,12%. A prevalência de polimedicação foi de 84% e nº de medicamentos prescrito em simultâneo variou entre 2 e 23.Não se observou associação entre a polimedicação, a idade: e o sexo. Em apenas um caso foi identificado um medicamento desaconselhado em função do diagnóstico (metoclopramida:Parkinson), e independentemente do diagnóstico a amiodariona foi o mais frequente (25%), hidroxizina (22%), ticlopidina (2%) e cetorolac (1%). Conclusões: A polimedicação é um fenómeno muito frequente nos idosos hospitalizados; o número de medicamentos envolvidos pode ser elevado e a prevalência de medicamentos que requerem uma ponderação sobre o risco/benefício no idoso, indicia a vantagem da revisão da terapêutica, impondo-se a implementação de estratégias informativas sobre os mesmos. Background: The demographic aging and expansion of life expectancy create conditions for increased occurrence of degenerative illnesses. Several critical aspects involve the medication of the elderly, such as: frequent polipharmacy with increased occurrence of adverse drug reactions, related to medication interactions and inappropriate prescribing, in which the benefits can be inferior to the risks.These aspects are particularly critical in the hospitalized elderly. Aim: This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of polipharmacy in hospitalized elderly and to analyze the medication considered inappropriate in this population. Participants and Methodology: A cross sectional model was followed, in which the data used relate to a period of a year and a half, focussing on the last hospitalization. The nature of the medication was analysed according to National Therapeutic Formulary, Drug Characteristics Summary and according to Beers-2002.It considered 100 elderly (>65 years) hospitalized at Hospital Cuf Descobertas. The personal and clinical data and the corresponding pharmacotherapeutic registration were introduced in a database created for this study in Access 2003 SP2. Descriptive statistics was calculated trough SPSS 13,0,.Exploraty analysis consisted in measures of average and spread for all variable considered relevant and univariate and bivariate analysis to quantify the prevalence of polipharmacy by sex and age and to relate polipharmacy with inappropriate medication. Results: Of the patients studied (65-98 years), the majority were women, 7 presented 4 pathologies, 13:3 pathologies, 27:2 pathologies and 30:1 pathology. In 23 patients there was any chronic pathology. Hypertension (n=49:27,5%) and cardiovascular disease (n=41:23%) were the most frequent disease in our study, and the minimal values were observed in rheumatism (n=1:0,56%), osteoporosis and psychic disorders (n=2:1,12%. The prevalence of polipharmacy was of 84% and the amount of medication simultaneously prescribed varied between 2 and 23.No association was observed between polipharmacy and age or gender. In only one case inappropriate medication was identified concerning diagnosis (metoclopramid: Parkinson), and independent of diagnosis the amiodaron was the most frequent (25%), hydroxyzin (22%), ticlopidin (2%). and ketorolac (1%). Conclusions: Polipharmacy is very prevalent among elderly people admitted to the hospital; the number of inappropriate medication can also be very high and this evidence should be collected in order to accomplish good drug use reviews and informative strategies in the hospital setting.

Determinantes de la gestión clínica en atención médica domiciliaria de personas con secuelas de enfermedad cerebro-vascular

La atención domiciliaria constituye hoy una modalidad de atención que permite solventar las dificultades derivadas de la sobreocupación hospitalaria y la cronicidad, los cuales constituyen un problema de interés en salud pública en los países desarrollados y que pueden ser manejados en el domicilio del paciente como una opción costo-efectiva y segura. Para lo cual es necesario buscar estrategias que permitan su desarrollo, gestión de riesgos y modelos de atención, logrando mejorar las condiciones de salud de la población. Uno de los principales retos de la gestión de programas de atención en salud, se encuentra en definir los aspectos donde intervenir para potenciar la eficacia y la calidad en la prestación del servicio, por lo que dichos aspectos se constituyen como determinantes de la atención del paciente y su familia. En este documento se abordan los principales determinantes en la atención de personas con secuelas de Enfermedad cerebrovascular, que reciben manejo medico domiciliario, con el objetivo de identificar las áreas prioritarias de intervención, garantizando una mejor gestión clínica en tres áreas específicas: sobrecarga del cuidador, Polimedicación y ulceras por decúbito.

Avaliação da utilização e segurança de medicamentos em pacientes idosos internados em um hospital universitário

O aumento da população idosa colabora para a maior prevalência de inúmeras e variadas patologias, cujos tratamentos em geral incluem recursos farmacológicos, que levam à prática de polifarmácia, fator esse que tem grande impacto na segurança do paciente idoso, tendo em vista que a polifarmácia é a grande responsável pelas reações adversas a medicamentos e interações medicamentosas. O objetivo foi avaliar a segurança e a utilização de medicamentos em prescrição de pacientes idosos com idade igual ou maior que 60 anos internados no Hospital Universitário João de Barros Barreto, da Universidade Federal do Pará. Trata-se de um estudo transversal, observacional de caráter descritivo e exploratório, para coleta de dados foi realizada análise de prontuários; os dados foram processados no programa estatístico SPSS 20.0. Os resultados demonstraram que a média de idade foi de 71,9 anos, sendo 52,7% mulheres; o sexo feminino apresentou pacientes idosos mais velhos que no sexo masculino. O tempo de internação obteve uma média de 21,7 dias, a média de diagnósticos por paciente foi de 2,6. O principal diagnóstico de internamento hospitalar foi doenças do aparelho circulatório (20,3%). A média de medicamentos prescritos por internação foi de 6,8. Os medicamentos mais utilizados faziam parte do sistema digestório e metabólico (32,4%), a prevalência de prescrição de medicamentos potencialmente inadequados durante as internações avaliadas foi de 11,2%, sendo maior entre as mulheres (58,8%), o medicamento potencialmente inadequado mais frequentemente nas prescrições foi o Butilbrometo de Escopolamina (25,2%). Em relação às potenciais interações medicamentosas, foram identificadas em 65,5% das prescrições, com uma média de 8,6 por paciente; os medicamentos mais envolvidos nas interações fazem parte do sistema cardiovascular (38,6%), a maior parte das interações medicamentosas potenciais possuía gravidade moderada (75,3%), as interações potenciais de ação farmacocinético corresponderam a 65,4% das prescrições e a hipotensão e hipercalemia corresponderam em conjunto por 30,7% das RAM; a estratégia de manejo de maior ocorrência foi a monitorização de sinais e sintomas (65,7%) e, no que se refere à monitorização, a pressão arterial correspondeu a 21,8%. No presente estudo, os fatores relacionados à polifarmácia foram: tempo de internação, número de diagnósticos, interação medicamentosa e a quantidade de medicamentos inapropriados; e foram constatadas como determinante na ocorrência de polifarmácia as variáveis clínicas: número de diagnósticos e tempo de internação. Diante de tais resultados, verifica-se a necessidade de se adotar estratégias para a otimização da farmacoterapia prestada ao paciente idoso.

Safety assessment of essential medicines for elderly people: a bibliographic survey

Certain medicines are considered potentially inappropriate (PIM) for elderly people as they increase the risk of adverse drug events (ADE) and because safer alternative therapies are available on the market. In this context, in order to identify the instruments that assess the quality of medical prescriptions for elderly and to determine which drugs are considered PIM, a bibliographic survey was conducted in PUBMED, LILACS and PAHO databases, in February and March/2010. The search strategy included the use of health descriptors and a manual search in the references cited by selected papers. During the period of data collection, 15 instruments were identified. In 2012, with the publication of the update of Beers criteria, this instrument was included in the study. We identified 163 PIM of 25 therapeutic classes, of which 125 (76.7%) are marketed in Brazil. Of these, 31 (24.8%) are essential medicines (RENAME 2012), of which 13 have safer therapeutic equivalents and 19 (15.2%) are over-the-counter drugs. Data suggest the need for inclusion of safer alternatives for the elderly in the national list of essential medicines and the pharmaceutical care for early detection of ADE in this age group, in order to contribute to the safe use of medicines.

Polypharmacy and specific comorbidities in university primary care settings.

AIMS Polypharmacy is associated with adverse events and multimorbidity, but data are limited on its association with specific comorbidities in primary care settings. We measured the prevalence of polypharmacy and inappropriate prescribing, and assessed the association of polypharmacy with specific comorbidities. METHODS We did a cross-sectional analysis of 1002 patients aged 50-80years followed in Swiss university primary care settings. We defined polypharmacy as ≥5 long-term prescribed drugs and multimorbidity as ≥2 comorbidities. We used logistic mixed-effects regression to assess the association of polypharmacy with the number of comorbidities, multimorbidity, specific sets of comorbidities, potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) and potential prescribing omission (PPO). We used multilevel mixed-effects Poisson regression to assess the association of the number of drugs with the same parameters. RESULTS Patients (mean age 63.5years, 67.5% ≥2 comorbidities, 37.0% ≥5 drugs) had a mean of 3.9 (range 0-17) drugs. Age, BMI, multimorbidity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and cardiovascular diseases were independently associated with polypharmacy. The association was particularly strong for hypertension (OR 8.49, 95%CI 5.25-13.73), multimorbidity (OR 6.14, 95%CI 4.16-9.08), and oldest age (75-80years: OR 4.73, 95%CI 2.46-9.10 vs.50-54years). The prevalence of PPO was 32.2% and PIP was more frequent among participants with polypharmacy (9.3% vs. 3.2%, p<0.006). CONCLUSIONS Polypharmacy is common in university primary care settings, is strongly associated with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular diseases, and increases potentially inappropriate prescribing. Multimorbid patients should be included in further trials for developing adapted guidelines and avoiding inappropriate prescribing.

The STRIPassistant: a Digital Tool to Optimize Polypharmacy

The Structured Tool to Reduce Inappropriate Prescribing (STRIP) is a method to perform a medication review. Part of this method is the pharmaceutical analysis that is digitalized into the STRIPassistant (demo: www.ephor.eu). The effectiveness and time-efficiency of the STRIPassistant will be presented.

Beers versus STOPP criteria in polyharmacy community-dwelling older patients

Objective: To assess potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) using Beers (2012 version) and STOPP (2008 version) criteria in polypharmacy, community-dwelling, older patients. Methods: From the information collected in the invoicing data of the prescriptions and the electronic medical records, a sample was selected of 223 ≥ 65-year-old patients who were taking simultaneously 10 or more drugs per day. Beers and STOPP criteria were separately applied, and the results obtained with the two methods were compared. Results: A total of 141 (63.2%) patients presented at least one Beers criterion. The two most frequently observed Beers criteria independent of diagnosis were the use of benzodiazepines and the use of non-COX-2-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. With regard to Beers criteria considering diagnosis, the most frequent were the use of anticholinergic drugs in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms or benign prostatic hyperplasia, and the use of benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, Zolpidem or H2-antihistamines, in patients with dementia or cognitive impairment. A total of 165 (73.9%) patients had at least one PIP according to the STOPP criteria. Duplicate drug classes and long-term use of long-acting benzodiazepines were the two most frequent STOPP criteria. Discussion: Our study identified a high frequency of PIP in poly-medicated community-dwelling older patients. Simultaneous application of Beers and STOPP criteria represents a useful tool to improve prescribing in this population group.

Implementación de criterios de Beers en pacientes con atención domiciliaria mayores de 75 años polimedicados y la identificación de las reacciones cruzadas

Introducción: El incremento de la población geriátrica es una realidad a nivel mundial y con esto los modelos de atención domiciliaria toman gran relevancia para dar respuesta a las diferentes patologías que requieran su seguimiento. Se ha evidenciado que en dicho seguimiento, el fenómeno de la polimedicación se presenta con frecuencia, con el riesgo de generar efectos cruzados y reacciones adversas que incrementan el deterioro clínico de los pacientes. Objetivo: Determinar los posibles efectos cruzados de la Polimedicación no pertinente en pacientes mayores de 75 años con hipertensión arterial más enfermedad neurodegenerativa en atención domiciliaria de una EPS del régimen contributivo en Bogotá, con base en los criterios de Beers.

Inappropriate Drug Prescribing in Older Adults: How to Reduce It?

Because older patients are more vulnerable to adverse drug-related events, there is a need to ensure appropriate pharmacotherapy in these patients. Screening to identify older patients at risk of drug-related problems (DRP) and adverse drug reactions (ADR) is the first critical step within a multistep approach to geriatric pharmacotherapy.

A pilot study to assess the appropriateness of prescribing from a collaborative pharmacist prescribing study in a surgical pre admission clinic

Background Current evidence to support non-medical prescribing is predominantly qualitative, with little evaluation of appropriateness. This study aims to evaluate the appropriateness of prescribing, and significance of omissions, from a doctor pharmacist collaborative prescribing model in an elective surgery pre admission clinic (PAC). Method A modified version of the Medication Appropriate Index (MAI) was developed, piloted and subsequently used by an expert panel, comprised of a surgeon, anaesthetist, clinical pharmacologist, pharmacist, resident medical officer (RMO) and clinical nurse. The tool was used to rate the appropriateness of prescribing of medications, and the significance of omissions in a 5% sample (N=19) of the total cohort from a randomised, controlled two arm trial of doctor-pharmacist collaborative prescribing. Results When reviewer assessments were combined, 32 out of 294 (10.9%) medications assessed for appropriateness in the control arm were classed as inappropriate, compared to 13 of 266 (4.9%) in the intervention arm. Out of 89 regular medications in the control arm, 25 (28%) were omitted from the medication charts, compared to 1 out of 55 (2%) in the intervention arm (p<0.001, fishers exact) On average, 52% of omissions in the control arm were judged to have potential for patient harm or ward inconvenience. Conclusion For the appropriateness of prescribing, overall results were similar between arms, as judged by individual panel members. Medication charts in the control arm contained significantly more omissions than in the intervention arm, a number of which were rated by the panel members as having the potential for patient harm or ward inconvenience.

Perspectives on prescribing in nursing homes in Helsinki

Prescribing for older patients is challenging. The prevalence of diseases increases with advancing age and causes extensive drug use. Impairments in cognitive, sensory, social and physical functioning, multimorbidity and comorbidities, as well as age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics all add to the complexity of prescribing. This study is a cross-sectional assessment of all long-term residents aged ≥ 65 years in all nursing homes in Helsinki, Finland. The residents’ health status was assessed and data on their demographic factors, health and medications were collected from their medical records in February 2003. This study assesses some essential issues in prescribing for older people: psychotropic drugs (Paper I), laxatives (Paper II), vitamin D and calcium supplements (Paper III), potentially inappropriate drugs for older adults (PIDs) and drug-drug interactions (DDIs)(Paper IV), as well as prescribing in public and private nursing homes. A resident was classified as a medication user if his or her medication record indicated a regular sequence for its dosage. Others were classified as non-users. Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) was used to assess residents’ nutritional status, Beers 2003 criteria to assess the use of PIDs, and the Swedish, Finnish, INteraction X-referencing database (SFINX) to evaluate their exposure to DDIs. Of all nursing home residents in Helsinki, 82% (n=1987) participated in studies I, II, and IV and 87% (n=2114) participated in the study III. The residents’ mean age was 84 years, 81% were female, and 70% were diagnosed with dementia. The mean number of drugs was 7.9 per resident; 40% of the residents used ≥ 9 drugs per day, and were thus exposed to polypharmacy. Eighty percent of the residents received psychotropics; 43% received antipsychotics, and 45% used antidepressants. Anxiolytics were prescribed to 26%, and hypnotics to 28% of the residents. Of those residents diagnosed with dementia, 11% received antidementia drugs. Fifty five percent of the residents used laxatives regularly. In multivariate analysis, those factors associated with regular laxative use were advanced age, immobility, poor nutritional status, chewing problems, Parkinson’s disease, and a high number of drugs. Eating snacks between meals was associated with lower risk for laxative use. Of all participants, 33% received vitamin D supplementation, 28% received calcium supplementation, and 20% received both vitamin D and calcium. The dosage of vitamin D was rather low: 21% received vitamin D 400 IU (10 µg) or more, and only 4% received 800 IU (20 µg) or more. In multivariate analysis, residents who received vitamin D supplementation enjoyed better nutritional status, ate snacks between meals, suffered no constipation, and received regular weight monitoring. Those residents receiving PIDs (34% of all residents) more often used psychotropic medication and were more often exposed to polypharmacy than residents receiving no PIDs. Residents receiving PIDs were less often diagnosed with dementia than were residents receiving no PIDs. The three most prevalent PIDs were short-acting benzodiazepine in greater dosages than recommended, hydroxyzine, and nitrofurantoin. These three drugs accounted for nearly 77% of all PID use. Of all residents, less than 5% were susceptible to a clinically significant DDI. The most common DDIs were related to the use of potassium-sparing diuretics, carbamazepine, and codeine. Residents exposed to potential DDIs were younger, had more often suffered a previous stroke, more often used psychotropics, and were more often exposed to PIDs and polypharmacy than were residents not exposed to DDIs. Residents in private nursing homes were less often exposed to polypharmacy than were residents in public nursing homes. Long-term residents in nursing homes in Helsinki use, on average, nearly eight drugs daily. The use of psychotropic drugs in our study was notably more common than in international studies. The prevalence of laxatives equaled other prior international studies. Regardless of the known benefit and recommendation of vitamin D supplementation for elderly residing mostly indoors, the proportion of nursing home residents receiving vitamin D and calcium was surprisingly low. The use of PIDs was common among nursing home residents. PIDs increased the likelihood of DDIs. However, DDIs did not seem a major concern among the nursing home population. Monitoring PIDs and potential drug interactions could improve the quality of prescribing.

Geriatrician interventions on medication prescribing for frail older people in residential aged care facilities

Objective: In Australian residential aged care facilities (RACFs), the use of certain classes of high-risk medication such as antipsychotics, potent analgesics, and sedatives is high. Here, we examined the prescribed medications and subsequent changes recommended by geriatricians during comprehensive geriatric consultations provided to residents of RACFs via videoconference. Design: This is a prospective observational study. Setting: Four RACFs in Queensland, Australia, are included. Participants: A total of 153 residents referred by general practitioners for comprehensive assessment by geriatricians delivered by video-consultation. Results: Residents’ mean (standard deviation, SD) age was 83.0 (8.1) years and 64.1% were female. They had multiple comorbidities (mean 6), high levels of dependency, and were prescribed a mean (SD) of 9.6 (4.2) regular medications. Ninety-one percent of patients were taking five or more medications daily. Of total medications prescribed (n=1,469), geriatricians recommended withdrawal of 9.8% (n=145) and dose alteration of 3.5% (n=51). New medications were initiated in 47.7% (n=73) patients. Of the 10.3% (n=151) medications considered as high risk, 17.2% were stopped and dose altered in 2.6%. Conclusion: There was a moderate prevalence of potentially inappropriate high-risk medications. However, geriatricians made relatively few changes, suggesting either that, on balance, prescription of these medications was appropriate or, because of other factors, there was a reluctance to adjust medications. A structured medication review using an algorithm for withdrawing medications of high disutility might help optimize medications in frail patients. Further research, including a broader survey, is required to understand these dynamics.