Effects of enforcement on speeds of motorists, 11th Street, Springfield, Illinois /

On cover: Illinois traffic safety programs, report of evaluation or assessment.

Evaluation of twelve local alcohol program enforcement components in Illinois /

"April 1996."

Evaluation of nine FY 96 Traffic Law Enforcement Program (TLEP) projects in Illinois /

"February 1998."

Evaluation of eleven local alcohol program enforcement components in Illinois /

"June 1998."

Evaluation of eight Traffic Law Enforcement Program (TLEP) projects in Illinois /

"June 1999."

Evaluation of the Traffic Law Enforcement Program (TLEP) and the Local Alcohol Program (LAP) projects in Illinois /

"May 2001."

Evaluation of five Local Alcohol Program enforcement components in Illinois /

An evaluation of five of the eleven Local Alcohol Program projects funded in FY98 based on the following criteria: patrol hours; traffic contact rate (citation/written warnings); DUI arrest rate; alcohol-related contact rate; DUI processing rate; occupant restraint percent distribution.

First accreditation of a state-wide law enforcement agency : accreditation of the Illinois Department of State Police /

"June 18, 1986."

Illinois Department of Law Enforcement occupational analysis executive summary /

Bibliography: p. 63.

Management audit : the Department of Public Aid's Child Support State Disbursement Unit.

"LPU order 26424 - March 2000."--Colophon.

The development and validation of Australian indices of child development - Part II : validity support

The two outcome indices described in a companion paper (Sanson et al., Child Indicators Research, 2009) were developed using data from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC). These indices, one for infants and the other for 4 year to 5 year old children, were designed to fill the need for parsimonious measures of children’s developmental status to be used in analyses by a broad range of data users and to guide government policy and interventions to support young children’s optimal development. This paper presents evidence from Wave 1data from LSAC to support the validity of these indices and their three domain scores of Physical, Social/Emotional, and Learning. Relationships between the indices and child, maternal, family, and neighborhood factors which are known to relate concurrently to child outcomes were examined. Meaningful associations were found with the selected variables, thereby demonstrating the usefulness of the outcome indices as tools for understanding children’s development in their family and socio-cultural contexts. It is concluded that the outcome indices are valuable tools for increasing understanding of influences on children’s development, and for guiding policy and practice to optimize children’s life chances.

The development and validation of Australian indices of child development — part II : validity support

The two outcome indices described in a companion paper (Sanson et al., Child Indicators Research, 2009) were developed using data from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC). These indices, one for infants and the other for 4 year to 5 year old children, were designed to fill the need for parsimonious measures of children’s developmental status to be used in analyses by a broad range of data users and to guide government policy and interventions to support young children’s optimal development. This paper presents evidence from Wave 1data from LSAC to support the validity of these indices and their three domain scores of Physical, Social/Emotional, and Learning. Relationships between the indices and child, maternal, family, and neighborhood factors which are known to relate concurrently to child outcomes were examined. Meaningful associations were found with the selected variables, thereby demonstrating the usefulness of the outcome indices as tools for understanding children’s development in their family and socio-cultural contexts. It is concluded that the outcome indices are valuable tools for increasing understanding of influences on children’s development, and for guiding policy and practice to optimize children’s life chances.