946 resultados para Humanist and Scientist


Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

A review article looking at the type of information requirements commonly shared by scientists and their use of traditional information services. Areas covered include primary requirements of IFE (Institute of Freshwater Ecology) staff, pure versus applied research, informal and personal sources of information, and traditional library and information services. It goes on to describe how research into information systems and technology may improve the wider accessibility and use of information to the scientific community. Technologies covered include online databases, telecommunications, gateways, expert systems, optical technology and applications of CDROM.

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The name Ernest Ingersoll is well-known to many shellfishery biologists as the author of two outstanding monographs on the shellfisheries of the United States and Canada in the 1880's. The first (Ingersoll, 1881a), entitled "A Report on the Oyster-Industry of the United States," was a 252-page description of historical and contemporary oyster fishing' marketing methods, and statistical data in the eastern provinces of Canada and the coastal states of the United States. The second (Ingersoll, 1887), entitled "The Oyster, Scallop, Clam, Mussel, and Abalone Industries," was a l20-page summary of the first monograph about oysters as well as a history and description of contemporary methods and statistical data of the other shellfisheries. Although Ingersoll was, by profession, a naturalist and author but only briefly a shellfish scientist, these monographs are regarded as benchmarks, providing the principal descriptions of shellfisheries in North America in the 1700's and 1800's.

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

King R. D., Whelan, K. E., Jones, F. M., Reiser, P. G. K., Bryant, C. H., Muggleton, S., Kell, D. B. and Oliver, S. G. (2004) Functional genomic hypothesis generation and experimentation by a robot scientist. Nature 427 (6971) p247-252

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Ce mémoire se focalise sur la pièce Antony and Cleopatra de Shakespeare en relation avec la pensée biblique, l’humanisme de la Renaissance et les caractéristiques de la tragédie comme genre littéraire et philosophie grecque. La chute d’Adam et Eve dans la Bible, ainsi que le conflit entre le héros tragique et les dieux, sont deux thèmes qui sont au centre de ce mémoire. Le mythe de la chute d’Adam et Eve sert, en effet, d’un modèle de la chute—et par conséquent, de la tragédie—d’Antoine et Cléopâtre mais aussi de structure pour ce mémoire. Si le premier chapitre parle de paradis, le deuxième évoque le péché originel. Le troisième, quant à lui, aborde une contre-rédemption. Le premier chapitre réfère à l’idée du paradis, ou l’Éden dans la bible, afin d’examiner ce qui est édénique dans Antony and Cleopatra. La fertilité, l’épicuréisme, l’excès dionysien sont tous des éléments qui sont présents dans la conception d’un Éden biblique et Shakespearien. Le deuxième chapitre est une étude sur la tragédie comme genre fondamentalement lié à la pensée religieuse et philosophique des grecs, une pensée qui anime aussi Antony and Cleopatra. Ce chapitre montre, en effet, que les deux protagonistes Shakespeariens, comme les héros tragiques grecs, défient les dieux et le destin, engendrant ainsi leur tragédie (ou ‘chute’, pour continuer avec le mythe d’Adam et Eve). Si le deuxième chapitre cherche à créer des ponts entre la tragédie grecque et la tragédie Shakespearienne, le troisième chapitre montre que le dénouement dans Antony and Cleopatra est bien différent des dénouements dans les tragédies de Sophocle, Euripide, et Eschyle. Examinant la pensée de la Renaissance, surtout la notion d’humanisme, la partie finale du mémoire présente les protagonistes de Shakespeare comme des éternels rebelles, des humanistes déterminés à défier les forces du destin.

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

On this article, the biography and work of one of the most influential scientists in psychology history is briefl y introduced. With his work, he laid the bases for the scientific study not only on personality, but also on human behaviour. Hence, the most important contributions done by this author are highlighted in a wide range of areas of our discipline, as well as the vision he had about how psychology should be as a science. A series of considerations related to the current situation of scientific psychology in Argentina, lead us to the conclusion that it is essential to rescue his work from forgetfulness, apart from going back over some of his lines of research and thoughts. 

Motion for a resolution tabled by tabled by Mr Ripa di Meana, Mr Pelikan, Mr Glinne, Mrs Gredal, Mr Abens, Mr Albers, Mr Arndt, Mr Cariglia, Mrs Castle, Mr Cohen, Mr Colla, Mr Dido, Mr Enright, Mr Estier, Mr Fellermaier, Mr Ferri, Mrs Focke, Mrs Fuillet, Mr Gabert, Mr Gatto, Mr Gautier, Mr Hansch, Mr Kavanagh, Mr Klinkenborg, Mrs Krouwel-Vlam, Mr Lezzi, Mr Linde, Mr Linkohr, Mr Loo, Mr Martinet, Mr van Minnen, Mr Muntingh, Mr Oehler, Mr Orlandi, Mr Peters, Mr Puletti, Miss Quin, Mr Radoux, Mr Ruffolo, Mr K. Schon, Mr Schwartzenberg, Mr Seefeld, Mr Seeler, Mrs Seibel-Emmerling, Mr Sieglerschmidt, Mrs van den Heuvel, Mrs Vayssade, Mrs Viehoff, Mr Walter, Mrs Weber, Mr Wettig, Mrs Wieczorek-Zeul, Mr Woltjer, Mr Zagari, on behalf of the Socialist Group, Mr Blumenfeld, Mr Lecanuet, Mr Fenders, Mr Michel, Mr Klepsch, Mr Ryan, Mr Bersani, Mr Pottering, Mr Diligent, Mrs Cassanmagnago Cerretti, Mr Simonnet, Mr von Hassel, Mrs Walz, Mr Antoniozzi, Mrs Moreau, Mr Beumer, Mr Henckens, Mr Aigner, Mr D'Ormesson, Mr Malangre, Mr Jonker, Mr Dalsass, Mr Estgen, Mr De Keersmaeker, Mr Herman, Mr Lucker, Mr Vandeweile, Mr Habsburg, Mr Seitlinger, Mr Pfennig, Mr Notenboom, Mr Fuchs, Mrs Gaiotti de Biase, Mr Janssen van Raay, Miss Boot, Mr Helms, Mr Fruh, Mr Vergeer, Mr Alber, Mr Lenz, Mr Luster, Mr Majonica, Mr Schall, on behalf of the Group of the European People's Party (C-D Group), Mr Scott-Hopkins, Lady Elles, Mr Normanton, Mr Prag, Mr Seligman, Lord Bethell, Mr Fergusson on behalf of the European Democratic Group, Mr Bangemann, Mr Haagerup, Mr Irmer, Mr Jurgens, Mr Mager, Mr Nord, Mr B. Nielsen, Mr Damseaux, Mrs Pruvot, Mr Rey, Mr Rossi, Mr Berkhouwer, Mr Combe, Mr Pintat, Mrs von Alemann, Mrs Scrivener, Mr Calvez, Mr Delatte, Mr Baudis on behalf of the Liberal and Democratic Group, Mr De La Malene, on behalf of the Group of European Progressive Democrats, Mrs Bonino, Mrs Macciocchi and Mr Pannelia with request for urgent debate pursuant to Rule 14 of the Rules of Procedure on the arrest of the scientist Andrei Sakharov. Working Documents 1979-1980, Document 1-778/79/rev. II, 13 February 1980

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.