Public health assessment : Lawrence Aviation Industries : Port Jefferson Station, Suffolk County, New York /

"November 29, 2005; CERCLIS No. NYD002041531."

Public health assessment : Ellenville Scrap Iron and Metal : Village of Ellenville, Town of Wawarsing, Ulster County, New York /

"February 1, 2006; CERCLIS No. NYSFN0204190."

Public health assessment, Hudson Technologies Inc., village of Hillburn, Rockland County, New York /

"CERCLIS No. NY0001392463."

Public health assessment, Peninsula Boulevard groundwater plume, town of Hempstead, Nassau County, New York /

Cover title.

Public health assessment : Stanton Cleaners area groundwater contamination site : Great Neck, Nassau County, New York /

"November 30, 2005; CERCLIS No. NYD047650197."

Health assessment for Frink's Industrial Waste, Pecatonica, Illinois /

Cover title: Health assessment, Frink's Industrial Waste, Pecatonica, Illinois.

Science of assessment

Psoriatic arthritis is a multisystem disorder which, from a measurement standpoint, demands consideration of its cutaneous manifestations and both axial and peripheral musculoskeletal involvement. Measurements of various aspects of impairment, ability/disability, and participation/ handicap are feasible using existing measurement techniques, which are for the most part valid, reliable, and responsive. Nevertheless, there remain opportunities for the further development of consensus around core set measures and responder criteria, as well as for instrument development and refinement, standardised assessor training, cross-cultural adaptation of health status questionnaires, electronic data capture, and the introduction of standardised quantitative measurement into routine clinical care.

Does health assessment improve health outcomes in Indigenous people? An RCT with 13 years of follow-up

Objective: To examine the impact of a multi-component health assessment on mortality and morbidity in Kimberley Aboriginal residents during a 13-year follow-up. Method. A population-based randomised controlled trial using linked hospital, cancer and death records to evaluate outcomes in 620 intervention and 6,736 control subjects. Results: The intervention group had a higher rate of first-time hospitalisation for any reason (IRR = 1.37; 95 % Cl 1.25-1.50), a higher rate of injury-related hospital episodes (IRR = 1.31; 95 % Cl 1.15-1.48) and a higher notification rate of alcohol-related cancers. There was a smaller difference in the rates of multiple hospitalisations (IRR = 1.14; 95 % Cl 0.751.74) and no improvement in overall mortality compared with controls (IRR = 1.08; 95 % Cl 0.91-1.29). Conclusions: There was no overall mortality benefit despite increased health service contact associated with the intervention. Implications: Although not influencing mortality rates, multi-component health assessment may result in a period of increased health service use in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations, thus constituting an 'intervention'. However, this should not be confused with systematic and sustained interventions and investment in community development to achieve better health outcomes.

Medication reconciliation by a pharmacy technician in a mental health assessment unit

Background: Medication discrepancies are common when patients cross organisational boundaries. However, little is known about the frequency of discrepancies within mental health and the efficacy of interventions to reduce discrepancies. Objective: To evaluate the impact of a pharmacy-led reconciliation service on medication discrepancies on admissions to a secondary care mental health trust. Setting: In-patient mental health services. Methods: Prospective evaluation of pharmacy technician led medication reconciliation for admissions to a UK Mental Health NHS Trust. From March to June 2012 information on any unintentional discrepancies (dose, frequency and name of medication); patient demographics; and type and cause of the discrepancy was collected. The potential for harm was assessed based on two scenarios; the discrepancy was continued into primary care, and the discrepancy was corrected during admission. Logistic regression identified factors associated with discrepancies. Main outcome measure: Mean number of discrepancies per admission corrected by the pharmacy technician. Results Unintentional medication discrepancies occurred in 212 of 377 admissions (56.2 %). Discrepancies involving 569 medicines (mean 1.5 medicines per admission) were corrected. The most common discrepancy was omission (n = 464). Severity was assessed for 114 discrepancies. If the discrepancy was corrected within 16 days the potential harm was minor in 71 (62.3 %) cases and moderate in 43 (37.7 %) cases whereas if the discrepancy was not corrected the potential harm was minor in 27 (23.7 %) cases and moderate in 87 (76.3 %) cases. Discrepancies were associated with both age and number of medications; the stronger association was age. Conclusions: Medication discrepancies are common within mental health services with potentially significant consequences for patients. Trained pharmacy technicians are able to reduce the frequency of discrepancies, improving safety. © 2013 Koninklijke Nederlandse Maatschappij ter bevordering der Pharmacie.

[Development of the short version of the informal caregiver burden assessment questionnaire]

OBJETIVE to create a reduced version of the QASCI, which is structurally equivalent to the long one and meets the criteria of reliability and validity. METHOD Through secondary data from previous studies, the participants were divided into two samples, one for the development of reduced version and the second for study of the factorial validity. Participants responded to QASCI, the SF 36, the ADHS and demographic questions. RESULTS A reduced version of 14 items showed adequate psychometric properties of validity and internal consistency, adapted to a heptadimensional structure that assesses positive and negative aspects of care. CONCLUSION Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good fit with the advocated theoretical model.

Minimum important difference between patients with rheumatoid arthritis : the patient's perspective

OBJECTIVE: To determine the point at which differences in clinical assessment scores on physical ability, pain and overall condition are sufficiently large to correspond to a subjective perception of a meaningful difference from the perspective of the patient. METHODS: Forty patients with a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis participated in an evening of clinical assessment and one-on-one conversations with each other regarding their arthritic condition. The assessments included tender and swollen joint counts, clinician and patient global assessments, participant assessment of pain and the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) on physical ability. After each conversation, participants rated themselves relative to their conversational partner on physical ability, pain and overall condition. These subjective comparative ratings were compared to the differences of the individual clinical assessments. RESULTS: In total there were 120 conversations. Generally participants judged themselves as less disabled than others. They rated themselves as "somewhat better" than their conversation partner when they had a (mean) 7% better score on the HAQ, 6% less pain, and 9% better global assessment. In contrast, they rated themselves as "somewhat worse" when they had a (mean) 16% worse score on the HAQ, 16% more pain, and 29% worse global assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients view clinically important differences in an asymmetric manner. These results can provide guidance in interpreting results and planning clinical trials.

Uma revisão sobre instrumentos de avaliação do estado funcional do idoso

Este estudo visa avaliar, através de uma revisão, as qualidades conceituais e psicométricas dos instrumentos de avaliação do estado funcional do paciente idoso, e de suas adaptações para o contexto do Brasil. A dissertação está estruturada em três partes. A primeira é constituída de cinco seções que introduzem os temas do envelhecimento da população mundial e de países emergentes como o Brasil como razões de base para um estudo do atendimento do paciente idoso. Descreve-se o que se entende por estado funcional do paciente idoso no contexto da avaliação geriátrica interdisciplinar. A parte 2 se constitui no artigo da dissertação. Na seção de material e métodos descreve-se detalhadamente a revisão realizada e os bancos de dados utilizados. Nas últimas duas seções do artigo apresentam-se os resultados e a discussão, em que se verificam, em primeiro lugar, um bom número de instrumentos com propriedades psicométricas adequadas que avaliam as subdimensões do estado funcional. Dos 30 instrumentos escolhidos utilizando critérios explicitados pelos autores, apenas dois, o Multiple Outcomes Study SF-36 e o Health Assessment Questionnaire, possuem adaptação para 0 português. Entretanto, alguns dos instrumentos revisados vêm sendo utilizados em nosso meio sem adaptação formal prévia. Vários destes instrumentos possuem bons históricos em sua língua original, porém este fato ainda não despertou a preocupação da comunidade brasileira para adaptações formais dos mesmos. Também se constatam a escassez de estudos de adaptação e concepção de instrumentos desta dimensão no contexto brasileiro. Alguns aspectos deste problema são discutidos, além de possíveis caminhos para corrigi-lo. Na parte final desta dissertação são sucintamente descritos os instrumentos de cada subdimensão de estado funcional escolhidos como mais interessantes na parte 2. Em seguida, são indicadas outras dimensões consideradas pertinentes para um escrutínio semelhante. A conclusão geral sugere uma melhor utilização de medidas de saúde estruturadas no contexto da avaliação geriátrica no Brasil.