"Viewers should not try this at home". Die Verfassungsgerichte Bosnien-Herzegowinas und Kosovos in deren Rolle als Schlichtungsinstanzen in ethnopolitischen Konflikten = The constitutional courts of Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo in their role as arbitration bodies in ethno-political conflicts. EDAP 01/2014

The article analyzes the role of constitutional courts in Bosnia and Kosovo, both characterized by their partly internationalized membership, in the adjudication of cases that are highly controversial between the different ethno-political factions. The main focus is on the Constitutional Court of Bosnia, which presents one of the richest and most interesting examples of “lawfare” in divided societies. The concept of lawfare has been adapted to refer to the continuation of political battles by ethno-political actors through legal means, in this case, constitutional adjudication. In Kosovo, the Constitutional Court has been an important defender of diversity, albeit its primary focus and merit are to have contributed to the establishment of a concept of democracy close to the people of Kosovo. The article concludes that constitutional courts represent important institutions of internal conflict resolution in divided societies, which have been instrumental in shaping multiculturalism in these post-conflict societies divided by deep ethnic cleavages.

Conciliation act, 1896, and Industrial courts act, 1919. Report on conciliation and arbitration including particulars of proceedings under the Conciliation act, 1896, the Coal mines (minimum wage) act, 1912, the Wages (temporary regulation) acts, 1918 and 1919, the Restoration of pre-war practices act, 1919, and the Industrial courts act, 1919 ... 1919[-1920] ...

Title varies slightly.

Report on the provisions of the project of Inter-American peace system relative to obligatory arbitration,

Report of the Committee on the Organization of the Inter- American System.--Report of the Juridical Subcommittee on the project of Inter-American peace system submitted by the Inter-American Juridical Committee on November 18, 1947.-- Comments on the draft project of Inter-American peace system formulated by the Inter-American Juridical Committee in 1945.-- Memorandum on the definite project of an inter-American peace system formulated by the Inter-American Juridical Committee, by C. G. Fenwick.

Labor arbitration, principles and procedures,

Mode of access: Internet.

American and British claims arbitration. : The Rio Grande claim. Answer of the United States.

The Appendix to the Answer of the United States has imprint: Washington, Govt. print. off., 1923.

Arbitration in international controversy,

Bibliographical foot-notes.

Report to the President by the Emergency Board appointed September 10, 1948, by Executive order 9996 pursuant to section 10 of the Railway labor act as amended, to investigate an unadjusted dispute concerning a grievance involving the Public Belt Railroad Commission for the City of New Orleans and certain of its employees represented by the Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen and the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen. New Orleans, Louisiana, September 18, 1948. No. 65.

Signed: Harry H. Schwartz, chairman, Floyd McGown, A. Langley Coffey.

Durham coal trade. Working hours arbitration, July, 1880.

Mode of access: Internet.

Arbitration between the United States and Sweden under special agreement of December 17, 1930. The "Kronprins Gustaf Adolf" and the "Pacific". Statement of case of the United States with appendices and exhibits.

Published also as U.S. Dept. of State. Arbitration series, no. 5¹.

Settling plant grievances; a review of grievance procedure under collective bargaining.

Mode of access: Internet.

Arbitration between the United States and Sweden under special agreement of December 17, 1930.

Parts 3 and 4, "Photographic reprint".

Permanent arbitration in modern international law. A paper read at the conference of the International Law Association, at Glasgow, 20th August, 1901.

Mode of access: Internet.

Arbitration between Peru and Chile. The case of Peru in the matter of the controversy arising out of the question of the Pacific, before the President of the United States of America, arbitrator, under the protocol and supplementary act between the Republic of Chile, signed July 20, 1922, at Washington, D.C., ratified January 15, 1923.

Includes documents in Spanish and English.

Arbitration between Peru and Chile. The counter case of Peru in the matter of the controversy arising out of the question of the Pacific, before the President of the United States of America, arbitrator, under the protocol and supplementary act between the Republic of Peru and the Republic of Chile, signed July 20, 1922 at Washington, D.C. ratified January 15, 1923.

Binder's title: Peruvian-Chilean arbitration. Appendix to the counter case of Peru.