Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders : DSM-IV-TR.

Since the "DSM-IV(R)" was published in 1994, we've seen many advances in our knowledge of psychiatric illness. This "Text Revision" incorporates information culled from a comprehensive literature review of research about mental disorders published since "DSM-IV(R)" was completed in 1994. Updated information is included about the associated features, culture, age, and gender features, prevalence, course, and familial pattern of mental disorders. The "DSM-IV-TR(R)" brings this essential diagnostic tool up-to-date, to promote effective diagnosis, treatment, and quality of care. Now you can get all the essential diagnostic information you rely on from the "DSM-IV(R)" along with important updates not found in the 1994 edition. Stay current with important updates to the "DSM-IV-TR(R)": Benefit from new research into Schizophrenia, Asperger's Disorder, and other conditions Utilize additional information about the epidemiology and other facets of DSM conditions Update ICD-9-CM codes implemented since 1994 (including Conduct Disorder, Dementia, Somatoform Disorders) DSM-IV-TR(R), the handheld version of the "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, "Fourth Edition, Text Revision, is now available for both Palm OS and PocketPC handhelds. This Text Revision incorporates information culled from a comprehensive literature review of research about mental disorders and includes associated features, culture, age, and gender features, prevalence, course, and familial pattern of mental disorders.This resource was contributed by The National Documentation Centre on Drug Use.

Sur le DSM-5

"La soirée des braves", Séance du 04.05 2011 Séminaire de Psychopathologie organisé par Daisy de Avila Seidl, Frédéric Nicod, Leslie Ponce et Renato Seidl

DSM-5: a collection of psychiatrist views on the changes, controversies, and future directions.

The recent release of the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) by the American Psychiatric Association has led to much debate. For this forum article, we asked BMC Medicine Editorial Board members who are experts in the field of psychiatry to discuss their personal views on how the changes in DSM-5 might affect clinical practice in their specific areas of psychiatric medicine. This article discusses the influence the DSM-5 may have on the diagnosis and treatment of autism, trauma-related and stressor-related disorders, obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, mood disorders (including major depression and bipolar disorders), and schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

DSM-IV and DSM-5 alcohol use disorder among young Swiss men.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Previous studies suggest that the new DSM-5 criteria for alcohol use disorder (AUD) will increase the apparent prevalence of AUD. This study estimates the 12-month prevalence of AUD using both DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria and compares the characteristics of men in a high risk sample who meet both, only one and neither sets of diagnostic criteria. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 5943 Swiss men aged 18-25 years who participated in the Cohort Study on Substance Use Risk Factors (C-SURF), a population-based cohort study recruited from three of the six military recruitment centres in Switzerland (response rate = 79.2%). MEASUREMENTS: DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria, alcohol use patterns, and other substance use were assessed. FINDINGS: Approximately 31.7% (30.5-32.8) of individuals met DSM-5 AUD criteria [21.2% mild (20.1-22.2); 10.5% moderate/severe (9.7-11.3)], which was less than the total rate when DSM-IV criteria for alcohol abuse (AA) and alcohol dependence (AD) were combined [36.8% overall (35.5-37.9); 26.6% AA (25.4-27.7); 10.2% AD (9.4-10.9)]. Of 2479 respondents meeting criteria for either diagnoses, 1585 (63.9%) met criteria for both. For those meeting DSM-IV criteria only (n = 598, 24.1%), hazardous use was most prevalent, whereas the criteria larger/longer use than intended and tolerance to alcohol were most prevalent for respondents meeting DSM-5 criteria only (n = 296, 11.9%). Two in five DSM-IV alcohol abuse cases and one-third of DSM-5 mild AUD individuals fulfilled the diagnostic criteria due to the hazardous use criterion. The addition of the craving and excluding of legal criterion, respectively, did not affect estimated AUD prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: In a high-risk sample of young Swiss males, prevalence of alcohol use disorder as diagnosed by DSM-5 was slightly lower than prevalence of DSM-IV diagnosis of dependence plus abuse; 63.9% of those who met either criterion met criteria for both.

Le elezioni cantonali ticinesi del 2011. Partecipazione e orientamento di voto fra lealtà, defezione, protesta.

Cette étude scientifique, basée sur une enquête post-électorale (N=1285), vise à analyser le cas des élections du gouvernement et du parlement du Canton du Tessin qui se sont déroulées en avril 2011. Celles-ci constituent un vrai tournant dans l'histoire électorale tessinoise. D'un côté, le taux de participation a été le plus bas depuis 1920 ; d'autre part, la Lega dei ticinesi est devenu le premier parti au Conseil d'Etat avec 2 sièges sur 5. Afin d'analyser les représentations du vote, la participation ainsi que la décision de vote (choix du parti, bulletin sans dénomination du parti, déplacement de votes), nous nous sommes inspirés de la triade conceptuelle de A. O. Hirschman (loyauté, défection et prise de parole). Les résultats montrent que ce vote tessinois ne doit pas être interprété exclusivement en termes de déclin de la loyauté (par rapport à l'acte de vote et aux partis traditionnels), comme augmentation de la défection ou "prise de parole". Au contraire, mais comme une articulation complexe de ces phénomènes.

Prevalence and correlates of DSM-5 bipolar and related disorders and hyperthymic personality in the community.

BACKGROUND: To 1) establish the lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-5 bipolar and related disorders including the new algorithmically defined conditions grouped within Other Specified Bipolar and Related Disorders (OSBARD) as well as hyperthymic personality in a randomly selected community sample, and 2) determine the clinical relevance of the OSBARD category in terms of sociodemographic characteristics, course, comorbidity and treatment patterns by comparing the subjects of this category to those with bipolar-I (BP-I), bipolar-II (BP-II), major depressive disorder (MDD), and those with no history of mood disorders. METHODS: The semi-structured Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies was administered by masterslevel psychologists to a random sample of an urban area (n=3'719). RESULTS: The lifetime prevalence was 1.0% for BP-I, 0.8% for BP-II, 1.0% for OSBARD and 3% for hyperthymic personality. Subjects with OSBARD were more severely affected than subjects without a history of mood disorders regarding almost all clinical correlates. Compared to those with MDD, they also revealed an elevated risk of suicidal attempts, lower global functioning, more treatment seeking and more lifetime comorbidity including anxiety, substance use and impulse-control disorders. However, they did not differ from subjects with BP-II. LIMITATIONS: Small sample sizes for bipolar and related disorders and potential inaccurate recall of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The modifications of diagnostic criteria for manic/hypomanic episodes according to the DSM-5 only marginally affect the prevalence estimates for BP-I and BP-II. The new DSM-5 OSBARD category is associated with significant clinical burden, is hardly distinct from BP-II with respect to clinical correlates and deserves similar clinical attention.

Exploring the proposed DSM-5 diagnostic threshold and severity scale for the alcohol use disorder

Aims :¦Several studies have questioned the validity of separating the diagnosis of alcohol abuse from that of alcohol dependence, and the DSM-5 task force has proposed combining the criteria from these two diagnoses to assess a single category of alcohol use disorders (AUD). Furthermore, the DSM-5 task force has proposed including a new 2-symptom threshold and a severity scale based on symptom counts for the AUD diagnosis. The current study aimed to examine these modifications in a large population-based sample.¦Method :¦Data stemmed from an adult sample (N=2588 ; mean age 51.3 years (s.d.: 0.2), 44.9% female) of current and lifetime drinkers from the PsyCoLaus study, conducted in the Lausanne area in Switzerland. AUDs and validating variables were assessed using a semi-structured diagnostic interview for the assessment of alcohol¦and other major psychiatric disorders. First, the adequacy of the proposed 2- symptom threshold was tested by comparing threshold models at each possible cutoff and a linear model, in relation to different validating variables. The model with the smallest Akaike Criterion Information (AIC) value was established as the best¦model for each validating variable. Second, models with varying subsets of individual AUD symptoms were created to assess the associations between each symptom and the validating variables. The subset of symptoms with the smallest AIC value was established as the best subset for each validator.¦Results :¦1) For the majority of validating variables, the linear model was found to be the best fitting model. 2) Among the various subsets of symptoms, the symptoms most frequently associated with the validating variables were : a) drinking despite having knowledge of a physical or psychological problem, b) having had a persistent desire or unsuccessful efforts to cut down or control drinking and c) craving. The¦least frequent symptoms were : d) drinking in larger amounts or over a longer period than was intended, e) spending a great deal of time in obtaining, using or recovering from alcohol use and f) failing to fulfill major role obligations.¦Conclusions :¦The proposed DSM-5 2-symptom threshold did not receive support in our data. Instead, a linear AUD diagnosis was supported with individuals receiving an increasingly severe AUD diagnosis. Moreover, certain symptoms were more frequently associated with the validating variables, which suggests that these¦symptoms should be considered as more severe.

Taxometric analysis of DSM-IV and DSM-5 alcohol use disorders.

BACKGROUND: With preparations currently being made for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5th Edition (DSM-5), one prominent issue to resolve is whether alcohol use disorders are better represented as discrete categorical entities or as a dimensional construct. The purpose of this study was to investigate the latent structure of DSM-4th edition (DSM-IV) and proposed DSM-5 alcohol use disorders. METHODS: The study used the Wave 2 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) to conduct taxometric analyses of DSM-IV and DSM-5 alcohol use disorders defined by different thresholds to determine the taxonic or dimensional structure underlying the disorders. RESULTS: DSM-IV and DSM-5 alcohol abuse and dependence criteria with 3+ thresholds demonstrated a dimensional structure. Corresponding thresholds with 4+ criteria were clearly taxonic, as were thresholds defined by cut-offs of 5+ and 6+ criteria. CONCLUSIONS: DSM-IV and DSM-5 alcohol use disorders demonstrated a hybrid taxonic-dimensional structure. That is, DSM-IV and DSM-5 alcohol use disorders may be taxonically distinct compared to no disorder if defined by a threshold of 4 or more criteria. However, there may be dimensional variation remaining among non-problematic to subclinical cases. A careful and systematic program of structural research using taxometric and psychometric procedures is warranted.

Des "psychoses affectives" aux "caractéristiques psychotiques" : les symptômes psychotiques selon le DSM, discutés à la lumière d'une série de 16 cas de dépression psychotique = From "affective psychoses" to "psychotic features": DSM's psychoticsymptoms discussed in the light of a series of 16 cases of psychoticdepression.

Objectifs. - Le DSM-5 donne une définition du symptôme psychotique indépendante de tout concept depsychose. Chez les patients dépressifs, la présence d'hallucination ou d'idée délirante, quelle que soit leurforme clinique, conduit en principe à diagnostiquer une dépression psychotique et à prescrire des neurolep-tiques. Les symptômes psychotiques sont subdivisés par le DSM en « congruents » ou « non congruents » àl'humeur. Nous discutons de la pertinence d'une catégorie de symptômes psychotiques « atypiques », peuévocateurs d'une psychose au sens classique du terme. Méthode. - Discussion de la définition opérationnelle des symptômes psychotiques du DSM, étude d'unesérie de 16 patients chez qui un diagnostic de dépression psychotique a été posé. Résultats. - Sur les 16 patients, deux seulement présentaient des symptômes psychotiques classiques, évo-cateurs d'une psychose. Chez les autres, le diagnostic reposait sur la présence de symptômes très atypiques,comme des hallucinations visuelles par exemple.