801 resultados para Ethics Committees, Research


Relevância:

90.00% 90.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

El objetivo de esta investigación es describir la calidad de vida y la calidad del sueño en los pacientes con diagnóstico de Síndrome de Apnea Hipoapnea del sueño, mediante el uso de un grupo de cuestionarios para obtener datos demográficos, la evaluación del grado de somnolencia diurna percibida, la percepción de la calidad del sueño y la percepción de la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud con encuestas en sus respectivas versiones validadas para Colombia.

Relevância:

90.00% 90.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

In Brazil, research involving human beings must obey to ethical norms foresaw by the 196/96 National Health Council Resolution of the Ministry of Health. This paper gives account of a knowledge evaluation about some concepts and rules established by the resolution by Dental post degree students. It is concluded that in spite of the spreading and importance of the resolution most students do not know about it. In the same situation are those who work in research.

Relevância:

90.00% 90.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Após considerações gerais sobre a ética na pesquisa envolvendo seres humanos, focaliza-se a possibilidade de ocorrências de injustiças, sob a égide de diversas formas de poder. Exemplificam-se situações concretas. Enfatiza-se a análise das possíveis injustiças à luz da Bioética, com destaque para multi e transdisciplinaridade. O autor se posiciona quanto às características atuais da Bioética, cuja ótica levou à elaboração das Diretrizes éticas para a pesquisa envolvendo seres humanos, no Brasil (Resolução 196/96 e complementares do Conselho Nacional de Saúde). Descreve-se a sistemática das atividades do Grupo Executivo de Trabalho - GET, designado pelo Conselho Nacional de Saúde (órgão de controle social na área da saúde), para elaborar as Diretrizes. É dado destaque à participação dos diversos segmentos da sociedade, evidenciando multi e transdiciplinaridade, sob a coordenação do GET, do qual o autor foi Presidente. Comentam-se os principais tópicos das Diretrizes brasileiras, enfocando-se a sua relação com o tema de poder e injustiça. Salienta-se o papel dos Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa - CEP e da Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa - CONEP.

Relevância:

90.00% 90.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Background Oral clefts are one of the most common birth defects with significant medical, psychosocial, and economic ramifications. Oral clefts have a complex etiology with genetic and environmental risk factors. There are suggestive results for decreased risks of cleft occurrence and recurrence with folic acid supplements taken at preconception and during pregnancy with a stronger evidence for higher than lower doses in preventing recurrence. Yet previous studies have suffered from considerable design limitations particularly non-randomization into treatment. There is also well-documented effectiveness for folic acid in preventing neural tube defect occurrence at 0.4 mg and recurrence with 4 mg. Given the substantial burden of clefting on the individual and the family and the supportive data for the effectiveness of folic acid supplementation as well as its low cost, a randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of high versus low dose folic acid for prevention of cleft recurrence is warranted. Methods/design This study will assess the effect of 4 mg and 0.4 mg doses of folic acid, taken on a daily basis during preconception and up to 3 months of pregnancy by women who are at risk of having a child with nonsyndromic cleft lip with/without palate (NSCL/P), on the recurrence of NSCL/P. The total sample will include about 6,000 women (that either have NSCL/P or that have at least one child with NSCL/P) randomly assigned to the 4 mg and the 0.4 mg folic acid study groups. The study will also compare the recurrence rates of NSCL/P in the total sample of subjects, as well as the two study groups (4mg, 0.4 mg) to that of a historical control group. The study has been approved by IRBs (ethics committees) of all involved sites. Results will be disseminated through publications and presentations at scientific meetings. Discussion The costs related to oral clefts are high, including long term psychological and socio-economic effects. This study provides an opportunity for huge savings in not only money but the overall quality of life. This may help establish more specific clinical guidelines for oral cleft prevention so that the intervention can be better tailored for at-risk women. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00397917

Relevância:

90.00% 90.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Background Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) may be discontinued because of apparent harm, benefit, or futility. Other RCTs are discontinued early because of insufficient recruitment. Trial discontinuation has ethical implications, because participants consent on the premise of contributing to new medical knowledge, Research Ethics Committees (RECs) spend considerable effort reviewing study protocols, and limited resources for conducting research are wasted. Currently, little is known regarding the frequency and characteristics of discontinued RCTs. Methods/Design Our aims are, first, to determine the prevalence of RCT discontinuation for specific reasons; second, to determine whether the risk of RCT discontinuation for specific reasons differs between investigator- and industry-initiated RCTs; third, to identify risk factors for RCT discontinuation due to insufficient recruitment; fourth, to determine at what stage RCTs are discontinued; and fifth, to examine the publication history of discontinued RCTs. We are currently assembling a multicenter cohort of RCTs based on protocols approved between 2000 and 2002/3 by 6 RECs in Switzerland, Germany, and Canada. We are extracting data on RCT characteristics and planned recruitment for all included protocols. Completion and publication status is determined using information from correspondence between investigators and RECs, publications identified through literature searches, or by contacting the investigators. We will use multivariable regression models to identify risk factors for trial discontinuation due to insufficient recruitment. We aim to include over 1000 RCTs of which an anticipated 150 will have been discontinued due to insufficient recruitment. Discussion Our study will provide insights into the prevalence and characteristics of RCTs that were discontinued. Effective recruitment strategies and the anticipation of problems are key issues in the planning and evaluation of trials by investigators, Clinical Trial Units, RECs and funding agencies. Identification and modification of barriers to successful study completion at an early stage could help to reduce the risk of trial discontinuation, save limited resources, and enable RCTs to better meet their ethical requirements.

Relevância:

90.00% 90.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

IMPORTANCE The discontinuation of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) raises ethical concerns and often wastes scarce research resources. The epidemiology of discontinued RCTs, however, remains unclear. OBJECTIVES To determine the prevalence, characteristics, and publication history of discontinued RCTs and to investigate factors associated with RCT discontinuation due to poor recruitment and with nonpublication. DESIGN AND SETTING Retrospective cohort of RCTs based on archived protocols approved by 6 research ethics committees in Switzerland, Germany, and Canada between 2000 and 2003. We recorded trial characteristics and planned recruitment from included protocols. Last follow-up of RCTs was April 27, 2013. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Completion status, reported reasons for discontinuation, and publication status of RCTs as determined by correspondence with the research ethics committees, literature searches, and investigator surveys. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 11.6 years (range, 8.8-12.6 years), 253 of 1017 included RCTs were discontinued (24.9% [95% CI, 22.3%-27.6%]). Only 96 of 253 discontinuations (37.9% [95% CI, 32.0%-44.3%]) were reported to ethics committees. The most frequent reason for discontinuation was poor recruitment (101/1017; 9.9% [95% CI, 8.2%-12.0%]). In multivariable analysis, industry sponsorship vs investigator sponsorship (8.4% vs 26.5%; odds ratio [OR], 0.25 [95% CI, 0.15-0.43]; P < .001) and a larger planned sample size in increments of 100 (-0.7%; OR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.92-1.00]; P = .04) were associated with lower rates of discontinuation due to poor recruitment. Discontinued trials were more likely to remain unpublished than completed trials (55.1% vs 33.6%; OR, 3.19 [95% CI, 2.29-4.43]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this sample of trials based on RCT protocols from 6 research ethics committees, discontinuation was common, with poor recruitment being the most frequently reported reason. Greater efforts are needed to ensure the reporting of trial discontinuation to research ethics committees and the publication of results of discontinued trials.

Relevância:

90.00% 90.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

OBJECTIVE To investigate the planning of subgroup analyses in protocols of randomised controlled trials and the agreement with corresponding full journal publications. DESIGN Cohort of protocols of randomised controlled trial and subsequent full journal publications. SETTING Six research ethics committees in Switzerland, Germany, and Canada. DATA SOURCES 894 protocols of randomised controlled trial involving patients approved by participating research ethics committees between 2000 and 2003 and 515 subsequent full journal publications. RESULTS Of 894 protocols of randomised controlled trials, 252 (28.2%) included one or more planned subgroup analyses. Of those, 17 (6.7%) provided a clear hypothesis for at least one subgroup analysis, 10 (4.0%) anticipated the direction of a subgroup effect, and 87 (34.5%) planned a statistical test for interaction. Industry sponsored trials more often planned subgroup analyses compared with investigator sponsored trials (195/551 (35.4%) v 57/343 (16.6%), P<0.001). Of 515 identified journal publications, 246 (47.8%) reported at least one subgroup analysis. In 81 (32.9%) of the 246 publications reporting subgroup analyses, authors stated that subgroup analyses were prespecified, but this was not supported by 28 (34.6%) corresponding protocols. In 86 publications, authors claimed a subgroup effect, but only 36 (41.9%) corresponding protocols reported a planned subgroup analysis. CONCLUSIONS Subgroup analyses are insufficiently described in the protocols of randomised controlled trials submitted to research ethics committees, and investigators rarely specify the anticipated direction of subgroup effects. More than one third of statements in publications of randomised controlled trials about subgroup prespecification had no documentation in the corresponding protocols. Definitive judgments regarding credibility of claimed subgroup effects are not possible without access to protocols and analysis plans of randomised controlled trials.

Relevância:

90.00% 90.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

BACKGROUND Research ethics approvals, procedures and requirements for institutional research ethics committees vary considerably by country and by type of organisation. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the requirements and procedures of research ethics committees, details of patient information and informed consent based on a multicentre European trial. DESIGN Survey of European hospitals participating in the prospective observational study on chronic postsurgical pain (euCPSP) using electronic questionnaires. SETTING Twenty-four hospitals in 11 European countries. PARTICIPANTS From the 24 hospitals, 23 local investigators responded; 23 answers were analysed. OUTCOME MEASURES Comparison of research ethics procedures and committee requirements from the perspective of clinical researchers. Comparison of the institutions' procedures regarding patient information and consent. Description of further details such as costs and the duration of the approval process. RESULTS The approval process lasted from less than 2 weeks up to more than 2 months with financial fees varying between 0 and 575 &OV0556;. In 20 hospitals, a patient information sheet of variable length (half page up to two pages) was provided. Requirements for patients' informed consent differed. Written informed consent was mandatory at 12, oral at 10 and no form of consent at one hospital. Details such as enough time for consideration, possibility for withdrawal and risks/benefits of participation were provided in 25 to 30% of the institutions. CONCLUSION There is a considerable variation in the administrative requirements for approval procedures by research ethics committees in Europe. This results in variation of the extent of information and consent procedures for the patients involved. TRIAL REGISTRATION euCPSP in Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01467102; PAIN-OUT in Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02083835.

Relevância:

90.00% 90.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

OBJECTIVES To investigate the frequency of interim analyses, stopping rules, and data safety and monitoring boards (DSMBs) in protocols of randomized controlled trials (RCTs); to examine these features across different reasons for trial discontinuation; and to identify discrepancies in reporting between protocols and publications. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We used data from a cohort of RCT protocols approved between 2000 and 2003 by six research ethics committees in Switzerland, Germany, and Canada. RESULTS Of 894 RCT protocols, 289 prespecified interim analyses (32.3%), 153 stopping rules (17.1%), and 257 DSMBs (28.7%). Overall, 249 of 894 RCTs (27.9%) were prematurely discontinued; mostly due to reasons such as poor recruitment, administrative reasons, or unexpected harm. Forty-six of 249 RCTs (18.4%) were discontinued due to early benefit or futility; of those, 37 (80.4%) were stopped outside a formal interim analysis or stopping rule. Of 515 published RCTs, there were discrepancies between protocols and publications for interim analyses (21.1%), stopping rules (14.4%), and DSMBs (19.6%). CONCLUSION Two-thirds of RCT protocols did not consider interim analyses, stopping rules, or DSMBs. Most RCTs discontinued for early benefit or futility were stopped without a prespecified mechanism. When assessing trial manuscripts, journals should require access to the protocol.

Relevância:

90.00% 90.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

BACKGROUND Information about the impact of cancer treatments on patients' quality of life (QoL) is of paramount importance to patients and treating oncologists. Cancer trials that do not specify QoL as an outcome or fail to report collected QoL data, omit crucial information for decision making. To estimate the magnitude of these problems, we investigated how frequently QoL outcomes were specified in protocols of cancer trials and subsequently reported. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study of RCT protocols approved by six research ethics committees in Switzerland, Germany, and Canada between 2000 and 2003. We compared protocols to corresponding publications, which were identified through literature searches and investigator surveys. RESULTS Of the 173 cancer trials, 90 (52%) specified QoL outcomes in their protocol, 2 (1%) as primary and 88 (51%) as secondary outcome. Of the 173 trials, 35 (20%) reported QoL outcomes in a corresponding publication (4 modified from the protocol), 18 (10%) were published but failed to report QoL outcomes in the primary or a secondary publication, and 37 (21%) were not published at all. Of the 83 (48%) trials that did not specify QoL outcomes in their protocol, none subsequently reported QoL outcomes. Failure to report pre-specified QoL outcomes was not associated with industry sponsorship (versus non-industry), sample size, and multicentre (versus single centre) status but possibly with trial discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS About half of cancer trials specified QoL outcomes in their protocols. However, only 20% reported any QoL data in associated publications. Highly relevant information for decision making is often unavailable to patients, oncologists, and health policymakers.

Relevância:

90.00% 90.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The challenges of research ethics and methodologies have been reflected on extensively, but – aside from the context of feminist methodologies – less so in relation to research on particular migration sites such as in transit, detention centres, at the borders or within migration administration. First attempts in this direction have been made (Düvell et al. 2010, Fresia et al. 2005, Riedner 2014, van Liempt/Bilger2009), however, more reflection and theorization is needed, considering the contested nature of these temporal and volatile sites. In this workshop, we thus aim at examining methodological as well as ethical questions that arise during field work: We attempt to reflect the power relations involved in the research process, the ethics of research design, the dissemination of research results, the question of gaining access to and – whenever necessary – staying in contact with our research subjects. How can we negotiate informed consent with subjects whose life is currently marked by transit and insecurity concerning their own future, and who are in an uncertain situation in which substantial information (legal, social, cultural etc.) is likely to be missing? How do we deal with the dilemma of possibly contributing to knowledge production that might facilitate removals and deportations in the future, considering that the reception of the results is not in the hands of the researchers? How do we deal with the anticipated as well as unexpected impacts of our research on social and political practice? Regarding fieldwork in state institutions, how do we negotiate the multiple loyalties we often find ourselves faced with as social researchers, both with the excluded migrants and with the authorities implementing the exclusions – two groupings considered to be opposite to each other (Lavanchy 2013)? Which different roles do researchers need to take on? The aim of our workshop is first and foremost to exchange experiences on fieldwork with others doing qualitative research on related topics and to consider its possible implications – including affective dimensions – for all participants involved in the research process: the migrants, the security staff of detention centres, its social workers, border police and bureaucrats and, last but not least, the researchers themselves. Furthermore, we generally wish to reflect upon the question of how best to conduct research in this contested field, applying an interdisciplinary perspective.

Relevância:

90.00% 90.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

As queimaduras na infância compreendem importante causa de atendimento hospitalar e internação e podem desencadear sequelas físicas e emocionais. Dependendo da gravidade e complexidade das lesões, a hospitalização da criança é prolongada para realização de tratamento adequado e ela é afastada tanto do convívio familiar como do social. O número de crianças em idade escolar que sofrem queimaduras, e consequentemente interrompem as atividades escolares, por períodos curtos ou até as abandonam, é significativo, tornando digno de preocupação o processo de reinserção escolar. Este estudo teve como objetivo interpretar os significados do processo de reinserção escolar de crianças sobreviventes de queimaduras. Realizou-se uma pesquisa com abordagem metodológica qualitativa, fundamentada no referencial teórico da Antropologia Interpretativa e no método etnográfico. Após a aprovação do estudo pelos Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa com Seres Humanos das instituições envolvidas, convidaram-se crianças sobreviventes de queimaduras em seguimento em um hospital-escola do interior paulista. Coletaram-se dados no hospital, no domicílio e na escola das crianças, de janeiro de 2012 a dezembro de 2013, por meio de entrevistas em profundidade audiogravadas e observação participante, complementadas pelo diário de campo. Participaram da pesquisa 14 crianças e os atores sociais envolvidos neste processo, como familiares, profissionais de saúde, professores, vizinha e amigo, totalizando 57 participantes. A coleta e análise dos dados ocorreram concomitantemente, e esta última seguiu os pressupostos da análise temática indutiva. Identificaram-se códigos, os quais, posteriormente, embasaram a construção das duas unidades de sentidos: \"Fatos e fatores prévios ao retorno escolar\" e \"A volta à escola\". A partir destas, identificou-se o núcleo temático, \"O olho puxa essas coisas. A gente olha mesmo\": enxergando o outro como diferente, o qual apresenta a explicação compreensiva do processo de reinserção escolar, fornecendo os significados da experiência. Os significados foram explicados por meio dos conceitos antropológicos de estigma, identidade e corporeidade. O culto ao corpo presente no contexto cultural brasileiro foi fator intensificador do estigma sofrido pelas crianças. Identificaram-se fatores facilitadores do processo, como: dar continuidade às atividades escolares e manter contato com professores e colegas durante a hospitalização; preparar a escola para receber a criança; abordar sobre queimadura na escola para evitar curiosidade; encarar a presença da discriminação e trabalhar as diferenças. Estas estratégias fazem com que todos os envolvidos se sintam ao menos mais confortáveis durante esse difícil processo que merece atenção e envolvimento dos familiares, profissionais de saúde e equipe escolar. A partir dos resultados desta pesquisa, esperamos empoderar as crianças e seus familiares acerca da melhor maneira para lidar com as queimaduras durante a reinserção escolar e contribuir para o desenvolvimento de ações e estratégias baseadas na cultura para que este processo ocorra da forma menos traumática possível

Relevância:

90.00% 90.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Introdução: Investigar os fatores associados à condição perineal no parto vaginal pode possibilitar modificações no cuidado com o períneo, de forma a contribuir para menores frequências de episiotomia e de lacerações perineais. Objetivos: Identificar os fatores associados à episiotomia; identificar os fatores associados à integridade perineal no parto vaginal; descrever os motivos apontados para a realização de episiotomia por enfermeiras obstétricas; e identificar as manobras de proteção perineal realizadas por enfermeiras obstétricas em um Centro de Parto Normal. Método: Estudo transversal com coleta de dados prospectiva por meio de formulário aplicado junto às enfermeiras obstétricas de um Centro de Parto Normal intra-hospitalar de São Paulo e que incluiu dados de todas as mulheres que deram à luz neste serviço no período de fevereiro de 2014 a janeiro de 2015. Na análise estatística, as associações entre as variáveis dependentes (episiotomia e integridade perineal) e as variáveis sociodemográficas, obstétricas e assistenciais foram estimadas por meio de Odds Ratios (OR), calculadas por meio de regressão logística binária univariada e múltipla com intervalos de confiança de 95 por cento (IC 95 por cento ), no programa estatístico SPSS versão 20. Foram realizadas análises separadas para cada variável dependente. Os motivos para a realização de episiotomia e o uso de manobras de proteção perineal foram descritos por meio de frequências e porcentagens. O estudo foi aprovado nos Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa das instituições proponente e coparticipante. Resultados: Foram analisados os dados de 802 mulheres (frequência de episiotomia de 23,8 por cento , 191 mulheres; integridade perineal de 25,9 por cento , 208 mulheres; laceração perineal de 50,3 por cento , 403 mulheres). Os fatores independentemente associados à episiotomia foram: não ter parto vaginal anterior (OR 26,72; IC 95 por cento 15,42-46,30), uso de ocitocina durante o trabalho de parto (OR 1,69; IC 95 por cento 1,12-2,57), puxos dirigidos (OR 2,05; IC 95 por cento 1,23-3,43), intercorrência no trabalho de parto (OR 2,61; IC 95 por cento 1,43-4,77) e posição semissentada no parto (5,45; IC 95 por cento 1,06-28,01). O uso de uma manobra de proteção perineal (OR 0,11; IC 95 por cento 0,04-0,26) ou de duas manobras ou mais (OR 0,09; IC 95 por cento 0,04-0,22) se apresentou como fator de proteção contra a episiotomia. Em relação à integridade perineal, os fatores independentemente associados foram: ter parto vaginal anterior (OR 3,88; IC 95 por cento 2,41-6,23) e cor da pele autorreferida não branca (OR 1,43; IC 95 por cento 1,01-2,04). As indicações para episiotomia incluíram, predominantemente, motivos relacionados às condições e dimensões do períneo. As manobras de proteção perineal foram utilizadas em aproximadamente 95 por cento dos partos vaginais, mas não impactaram as taxas de integridade perineal. Conclusões: As variáveis associadas à episiotomia incluíram, em sua maioria, fatores que podem ser controlados pelo profissional de saúde. Estas variáveis não impactaram as taxas de integridade perineal. Informar os profissionais que atuam na assistência ao parto e as mulheres que buscam esse atendimento sobre os fatores associados à condição perineal no parto vaginal pode contribuir para a redução da frequência de episiotomia e para preservar a integridade perineal no parto vaginal.

Relevância:

90.00% 90.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

There are numerous ethical issues that one must consider when developing a research project; however, much discussion about ethics in health research has focused on experimental studies such as clinical trials. As a result, there remains some ambiguity as to the ethical issues that need to be considered in health-related social research. This paper outlines a number of important ethical issues that CAM researchers should be aware of when developing, running and writing up social research. Maintaining high ethical standards is extremely important in social research as it protects participants and researchers, improves the quality of the data retrieved and ensures that future researchers will have access to participants within the community. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Relevância:

90.00% 90.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The concept of sample size and statistical power estimation is now something that Optometrists that want to perform research, whether it be in practice or in an academic institution, cannot simply hide away from. Ethics committees, journal editors and grant awarding bodies are now increasingly requesting that all research be backed up with sample size and statistical power estimation in order to justify any study and its findings. This article presents a step-by-step guide of the process for determining sample sizeand statistical power. It builds on statistical concepts presented in earlier articles in Optometry Today by Richard Armstrong and Frank Eperjesi.