À propos de The Practice of Liberal Pluralism de William Galston : un dialogue avec l’auteur

Document de travail

Les décisions d'hospitalisation et de soins psychiatriques sans le consentement des patients dans des contextes clinique et judiciaire: une étude du pluralisme normatif appliqué

Thèse de doctorat réalisée en cotutelle avec l'Institut du social et du politique de l'École Normale supérieure de Cachan.

Ricoeur's "Petite éthique": an ethical epistemological perspective for clinician-bioethicists

This is a preprint of an article published in HEC Forum, 2010 22(4): 311-26. URL: http://www.springerlink.com/content/jj08821k513u5747/

Cosmopolitan citizenship and pathologies of pluralism

There are two interconnected questions obscured in the contemporary discourse of legal pluralism. The first concerns the legitimacy of the various forms of pluralism. The second concerns their pathology. If we accept that law does not issue from a unitary source, the problem becomes to characterize the kinds of pluralism in which we find ourselves and to discern their principles of legitimacy. It cannot be taken for granted that they are all legitimate, that is to say, that they can both articulate and fulfill founding principles of justification. That leads to the second question. To celebrate all legal pluralism simply by drawing attention to it as anobservable, documented fact, without considering whether that pluralism conduces to the just and the good, is like speaking of the pluralism of the body’s mechanisms without asking whether any given complex of cells is malignant or benign.

Maxims of Action in a Financial Co-operative: Epistemological and Theoretical Issues

Full Text / Article complet

What’s wrong with Charles Taylor’s moral pluralism

In political philosophy one often encounters claims on behalf of pluralism, yet there is anything but a consensus over the meaning of this fundamental concept. It is true that there is no single pluralist tradition; rather, there are different pluralist traditions within different domains of practical reason. No one would object, however, to the notion that Isaiah Berlin’s “value pluralism” is a genuine form of meta-ethical pluralism. Charles Taylor is another philosopher who is often called a pluralist, but I shall argue that this is a mistake. One of the central goals of his philosophy is that of reconciling competing aims and ends and this is incompatible with pluralism.

Tacit knowing, moral development and pluralism: thoughts on mentoring, judgment and reform.

Resumen basado en el del autor

Domain specific and general epistemological beliefs their effects on mathematics

Resumen basado en el de la publicación

The phenomenological, epistemological, and semiotic components of generalization

Resumen basado en el de la publicaci??n