471 resultados para EVALUACION


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Incluye Bibliografía

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Incluye Bibliografía

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Incluye Bibliografía

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

El rol docente tiene dos aspectos fundamentales: facilitar el aprendizaje y evaluar la adquisición de éste por parte de los educandos. En los últimos años, debido fundamentalmente a la creación del nuevo Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior (EEES), se ha discutido largamente en el entorno universitario acerca de la conveniencia de cambiar las metodologías, tanto en la parte de transmisión del conocimiento como en las labores de evaluación. Más allá de cambiar el lenguaje universitario, adaptándolo a la terminología pedagógica de mediados del siglo XX, este proceso no parece haber generado en la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, en lo sucesivo UPM, cambios efectivos en lo que se refiere a la transmisión del conocimiento. Sin embargo, los métodos de evaluación sí han cambiado apreciablemente en los últimos años.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Trata sobre las migraciones internas en Costa Rica y la naturaleza de tales procesos.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Importancia de la represa El Cajón, Honduras, una de la más importantentes de Centroamérica, con unos 190 MW de capacidad instalada.  Se evalúan sus beneficios económicos y políticos, pero también, el empeoramiento en el nivel de vida de los grupos sociales que vieron aumentar el desempleo abierto (21%), subempleo (60%)

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

A new species of phlebotomine sand fly, Lutzomyia adamsi n. sp., is described and illustrated from specimens collected during August 1994, in Sandia, Department of Puno-Peru. According to the Oficina Nacional de Evaluacion de Recursos Naturales(ONERN 1976), this locality is situated in the life zone known as humid, mountain, low tropical forest (bh-MBT). Many areas in the northern part of Puno, mainly in the Inambari and Tambopata basins, are endemic to leishmaniasis. These areas are the continuation of others, largely known as "leishmaniasic" in the departments of Cusco and Madre de Dios. The morphological characteristics indicated that this species belongs to the genus Lutzomyia, subgenus Helcocyrtomyia Barretto, 1962

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

BACKGROUND To assess and compare the effectiveness and costs of Phototest, Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Memory Impairment Screen (MIS) to screen for dementia (DEM) and cognitive impairment (CI). METHODS A phase III study was conducted over one year in consecutive patients with suspicion of CI or DEM at four Primary Care (PC) centers. After undergoing all screening tests at the PC center, participants were extensively evaluated by researchers blinded to screening test results in a Cognitive-Behavioral Neurology Unit (CBNU). The gold standard diagnosis was established by consensus of expert neurologists. Effectiveness was assessed by the proportion of correct diagnoses (diagnostic accuracy [DA]) and by the kappa index of concordance between test results and gold standard diagnoses. Costs were based on public prices and hospital accounts. RESULTS The study included 140 subjects (48 with DEM, 37 with CI without DEM, and 55 without CI). The MIS could not be applied to 23 illiterate subjects (16.4%). For DEM, the maximum effectiveness of the MMSE was obtained with different cutoff points as a function of educational level [k = 0.31 (95% Confidence interval [95%CI], 0.19-0.43), DA = 0.60 (95%CI, 0.52-0.68)], and that of the MIS with a cutoff of 3/4 [k = 0.63 (95%CI, 0.48-0.78), DA = 0.83 (95%CI, 0.80-0.92)]. Effectiveness of the Phototest [k = 0.71 (95%CI, 0.59-0.83), DA = 0.87 (95%CI, 0.80-0.92)] was similar to that of the MIS and higher than that of the MMSE. Costs were higher with MMSE (275.9 ± 193.3€ [mean ± sd euros]) than with Phototest (208.2 ± 196.8€) or MIS (201.3 ± 193.4€), whose costs did not significantly differ. For CI, the effectiveness did not significantly differ between MIS [k = 0.59 (95%CI, 0.45-0.74), DA = 0.79 (95%CI, 0.64-0.97)] and Phototest [k = 0.58 (95%CI, 0.45-0.74), DA = 0.78 (95%CI, 0.64-0.95)] and was lowest for the MMSE [k = 0.27 (95%CI, 0.09-0.45), DA = 0.69 (95%CI, 0.56-0.84)]. Costs were higher for MMSE (393.4 ± 121.8€) than for Phototest (287.0 ± 197.4€) or MIS (300.1 ± 165.6€), whose costs did not significantly differ. CONCLUSION MMSE is not an effective instrument in our setting. For both DEM and CI, the Phototest and MIS are more effective and less costly, with no difference between them. However, MIS could not be applied to the appreciable percentage of our population who were illiterate.