New Standards of Justice: Uncovering Motivations for Mexico’s Recent Judicial Reforms amid a Security Crisis

From the introduction: Mexico is in a state of siege. In recent years, organized crime and drug-related violence have escalated dramatically, taking innocent lives and leaving the country mired in bloodshed. The Mexican government, under the leadership of President Felipe Calderón, has responded in part by significantly extending the reach of its security operations, deploying thousands of federal police officers and military troops to combat the activities of drug cartels, and collaborating with the United States on an extensive regional security plan known as the Mérida Initiative. In the midst of the security crisis, however, the government has somewhat paradoxically adopted judicial reforms that protect human rights and civil liberties rather than erode them, specifically the presumption of innocence standard in criminal proceedings and the implementation of oral trials. Assuming that the new laws on the books will be applied in practice, these reforms represent an important commitment on the part of the government to uphold human rights and civil liberties. This is in stark contrast to the infamous judicial reforms in Colombia—the institutionalization of anonymous or “faceless” prosecutions in special courts—implemented after a surge in leftist and cartel brutality, and the murders of several prominent public and judicial officials in the 1980s.

Interview with Professor Mark Brodin about his book "William P. Homans Jr.: A Life In Court"

Boston lawyer William P. Homans Jr. devoted his fifty-year career to the defense of the poor and downtrodden, the protection of our most basic civil liberties, and the abolition of the death penalty. Descendant of two of Boston's oldest and most prominent families, and combat veteran of both the British and American Navies during World War II, Homans became unlikely guru to the 1960s generation of radical lawyers and antiwar activists. He was on the defense team in the 1968 conspiracy trial of Dr. Benjamin Spock and four other leading opponents of the Vietnam War accused of aiding and abetting resistance to the military draft, and represented Dr. Kenneth Edelin in the 1975 manslaughter prosecution arising out of a lawful abortion performed after Roe v. Wade. The narrative contrasts Bill Homans' storied legal career with a troubled personal life in a balanced but unvarnished manner, testifying to the strength of the human spirit when committed to the pursuit of the common good. About the author: Mark S. Brodin is Professor of Law at Boston College Law School and the author of numerous books and law journal articles in the areas of civil and criminal procedure, evidence, litigation, and employment discrimination. A graduate of Columbia College (1969) and Columbia Law School (1972), he served as law clerk to United States District Judge Joseph L. Tauro and staff attorney with the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights in Boston. He has also practiced for brief periods as a public defender in Boston and a prosecutor in Norfolk County.

Investigation of Offences against National Security

The study is a close scrutiny of the process of investigation of offences in India along with an analysis of powers and functions of the investigating agency. The offences, which are prejudicial to sovereignty, integrity and security of the nation or to its friendly relations with foreign states, are generally called the offences against national security. Offences against national security being prejudicial to the very existence of the nation and its legal system, is a heinous and terrible one. As early as 1971 the Law Commission of India had pointed out the need of treating the offences relating to national security and their perpetrators on a totally different procedural footing. The recommendation that, all the offences coming under the said category ought to be brought under the purview of a single enactment so as to confront such offences effectively. The discrepancies in and inadequacies of the criminal justice system in India as much as they are related to the investigations of the offences against national security are examined and the reforms are also suggested. The quality of criminal justice is closely linked with the caliber of the prosecution system and many of the acquittals in courts can be ascribed not only to poor investigations but also to poor quality of prosecution.

Human Rights Violations in Police Custody

Human rights are the basic rights of every individual against the state or any other public authority as a member of the human family irrespective of any other consideration. Thus every individual of the society has the inherent right to be treated with dignity in all situations including arrest and keeping in custody by the police. Rights of an individual in police custody are protected basically by the Indian Constitution and by various other laws like Code of Criminal Procedure, Evidence Act, Indian Penal Code and Protection of Human Rights Act. The term `custody' is defined neither in procedural nor in substantive laws. The word custody means protective care. The expression `police custody' as used in sec. 27 of Evidence Act does not necessarily mean formal arrest. In India with special reference to Kerala and evolution and development of the concept of human rights and various kinds of human rights violations in police custody in different stages of history. Human rights activists and various voluntary organisations reveals that there are so many factors contributing towards the causes of violations of human rights by police. Sociological causes like ambivalent outlook of the society with respect to the use of third degree methods by the police, economic causes like meager salary and inadequate living conditions, rampant corruption in police service, unnecessary political interference in the crime investigation, work load of police personnel without any time limit and periodic holidays, unnecessary pressure from superior police officers and the general public for speedy detection causing great mental strain to the investigating officers, defective system of recruitment and training, imperfect system of investigation and lack of public co-operation are some of the factors identified in the field survey towards the causes of violations of human rights in police custody.

Responsabilidad penal de las personas jurídicas

La responsabilidad penal de las personas jurídicas es un tema que adquiere cada vez mayor relevancia en una sociedad que sufre constantes cambios, y en la que se perfeccionan cada vez más las formas de cometer delitos. En el presente trabajo se realiza el estudio sobre la evolución de la figura de la responsabilidad penal de las personas jurídicas, abarcando desde el derecho romano hasta nuestros días. En el desarrollo del mismo, se expone el recorrido a través de las diferentes alternativas normativas y académicas consideradas a nivel mundial, mostrando las características de cada ordenamiento jurídico con respecto a la aceptación, la negación o la obtención de una normatividad en regímenes diferentes al penal frente al tema de estudio. Igualmente, se analizan los avances logrados en Colombia en materia de implementación de una normatividad que regule la responsabilidad de las personas jurídicas. Finalmente, se exponen los mecanismos alternativos de regulación, que brindan una valiosa herramienta para aquellos países en los que la responsabilidad penal de las personas jurídicas se encuentra proscrita.

A juridical-practical framework for the investigation of crimes against granting of public housing services

The public service enterprises are victims of crimes and felonies which may reduce their capacity to perform their functions. These enterprises expend much money and effort in order to prevent those criminal behaviors. For this reason they ask from the authorities more efficient measures against crime; however, such enterprises may feel that they are not being given sufficient importance and/or remedies in dealing with such crime. The aim paper of this is not to study the problem from de substantive criminal law point of view. Rather, this paper’s goal is to study the Colombia’s Rules of Criminal Procedure, which regulate the investigation of this kind of crime. The article will look particularly at the competency of the relevant authorities at the investigative stages. Finally, it will make some recommendations regarding a proper route towards the investigation of these criminal behaviors.

Estudio comparativo entre el sistema probatorio del derecho común Americano y el sistema probatorio del derecho civil Colombiano

Mediante el estudio comparativo entre el sistema probatorio del “Common Law” Americano y el régimen probatorio del “ Civil Law” Colombiano, se pretende dar una perspectiva general del manejo que se le da a las pruebas en dos sistemas jurídicos

As declarações do arguido e a estrutura acusatória do processo penal português

Changes to the rules concerning the admissibility of statements read in trial, previously provided by the defendant, despite its apparent simplicity, undermine the criminal procedural architecture projected from the constitutional structure accusatory criminal procedure. The principle that in judging only can be valued the evidence produced before the judge gives rise the production of evidence by the prosecution in the investigation phase.

Responsabilidad de dar cuenta del desempeño de la función jurisdiccional (Tema Central)

En esta presentación abordaré tres asuntos, fundamentalmente. la primera cuestión a la que quisiera referirme es la de por qué dar cuenta, que en ocasiones puede considerarse obvia pero no lo es tanto, el segundo punto enfocará los contenidos respecto a los cuales quien ejerce una función jurisdiccional debe dar cuenta, finalmente, abordaré el asunto de la trascendencia o relevancia que socialmente alcanzan el cumplir y el incumplir con esta responsabilidad. Una puntualización aclaratoria: cuando me refiero a quienes ejercen función jurisdiccional, incluyo en ello tanto a jueces como a fiscales. Aunque en esta reunión se enfoca específicamente el caso de los jueces, dado que los integrantes del Ministerio Público también ejercen función jurisdiccional –especialmente en el caso de aquellos países donde se ha introducido el proceso penal reformado–, el abordaje del tema que propongo también los comprende.

Proposta metodológica de perícia contábil para o crime de apropriação indébita previdenciária

No decorrer dos últimos anos vêm ocorrendo uma demanda crescente da utilização de serviços periciais nos mais diversos campos. No campo contábil, especificamente no contexto dos crimes previdenciários, a gama de serviços periciais contábeis prestados às lides forenses aumenta a cada dia que passa. Este estudo trata da perícia contábil como meio de prova para materialização do crime de apropriação indébita previdenciária. O desenvolvimento do tema foi efetuado a partir da pesquisa efetuada por Oliveira (2012), que comprovou a relação existente entre tipo penal e a prova pericial contábil, bem como de interpretações da legislação pertinente, no caso, a Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil, Código Penal, Código do Processo Penal e Normas Brasileiras de Contabilidade aplicáveis à perícia. Esta dissertação teve por objetivo a proposição de metodologia para realização de exames periciais que visam a comprovação do cometimento do crime de apropriação indébita previdenciária. A pesquisa empírica foi realizada num total de 79 laudos contábeis emitidos pela criminalística da Polícia Federal no período de junho de 2006 a junho de 2011, envolvendo os exames periciais sobre o crime de apropriação indébita previdenciária, para verificar a natureza das provas utilizadas nestes exames, e, por conseguinte, reunir o conjunto probatório utilizado. Como resultado da pesquisa realizada, foi apresentada uma metodologia para realização de exames periciais contendo o conjunto probatório considerado essencial para a materialização do crime de apropriação indébita previdenciária.

O Réu sem rosto: a importância da audiência de custódia no processo penal sob a ótica da economia comportamental

Neste artigo são discutidas formas de promover a melhoria da política pública prisional brasileira especialmente no que tange o preso provisório, com enfoque nas contribuições que a economia comportamental pode fornecer ao direito. A questão central do debate é como o modelo processual atualmente adotado não cria um ambiente favorável à liberdade, na medida em que não promove o diálogo entre o acusado e seu julgador. Os estudos econômicos, assim, podem nos fornecer importantes lições de como reverter a curva ascendente do número de presos provisórios no país e o impacto da instituição da audiência de custódia no processo penal brasileiro.

Aperfeiçoamento da política pública penal no Brasil : a inserção da audiência de custódia no processo penal

Neste exercício são discutidas formas de empreender mudanças em políticas públicas, focando especialmente no estudo da política prisional brasileira. O que é central no debate proposto é a viabilidade da inserção de audiência a ser realizada imediatamente após a prisão de um indivíduo, a audiência de custódia, que possibilitará o encontro entre a pessoa presa e o juiz. O ator promotor da mudança, o Instituto de Defesa do Direito de Defesa – IDDD apregoa como resultado mecanismos de prevenção e combate à tortura e um efetivo controle judicial da detenção. Subsequente a esse argumento, o Instituto é enquadrado como figura influente no papel de grupo de pressão pela mudança na política pública prisional por meio da defesa da audiência de custódia.

Ne bis in idem: limites jurídico-constitucionais à persecução penal

This legal research aims to demonstrate the prohibition in the Brazilian criminal system of a multiple imputation for the same fact in a simultaneous or successive way. For that it is developed a different idea of the subject. Through comparative, eletronic and bibliographical researches, the dissertation was accomplished in a way to establish the content of the foundations of the criminal procedural emphasizing as fundamental premise the values of the Constitution. In the first section it was demonstrated the limits of the theme and the objective of the research. After that, it was analyzed the basic function of the criminal suit which has the important mission of limiting state's punitive power. In the same way, the criminal procedure corresponds to a warranty of the citizens' freedom. In the same section, it is shown how it is possible to abandon the myth of the real truth in the criminal law system. In the third section of the research, there were pointed elements and definitions about the cognition object, specially the litigious object or "thema decidendum", and also the peculiarities of the judged cases. In the fourth section the subject about origins and evolution of the criminal procedure and its objectives in the legal system is developed to demonstrate its perspectives. Some aspects of the identity's concept of the presupposition of the facts are as well demonstrated in order to relate the theme to the prohibition of multiple imputation. There are also considerations about some other important aspects as the incidence of the legal rules and the possible change on the elements of the penal type. There are several comments about legal procedural in other legal systems comparing them to Brazilian's most elevated Courts. In the end it was systematized the limits to criminal imputation, emphasizing the defende's right as a foundation of the legal system. Is was registered that the ius persequendi can be exercised once

O direito fundamental contra a autoincriminação: a análise a partir de uma teoria do Processo Penal Constitucional

The right against self-incrimination is a fundamental right that works in the criminal prosecution, and therefore deserves a study supported by the general theory of criminal procedure. The right has a vague origin, and despite the various historical accounts only arises when there is a criminal procedure structured that aims to limit the State´s duty-power to punish. The only system of criminal procedure experienced that reconciles with seal self-incrimination is the accusatory model. The inquisitorial model is based on the construction of a truth and obtaining the confession at any cost, and is therefore incompatible with the right in study. The consecration of the right arises with the importance that fundamental rights have come to occupy in the Democratic Constitutional States. In the Brazilian experience before 1988 was only possible to recognize that self-incrimination represented a procedural burden for accused persons. Despite thorough debate in the Constituent Assembly, the right remains consecrated in a textual formula that´s closer to the implementation made by the Supreme Court of the United States, known as "Miranda warnings", than the text of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution that established originally the right against self-incrimination with a constitutional status. However, the imprecise text does not prevent the consecration of the principle as a fundamental right in Brazilian law. The right against self-incrimination is a right that should be observed in the Criminal Procedure and relates to several of his canons, such as the the presumption of not guilty, the accusatory model, the distribution of the burden of proof, and especially the right of defense. Because it a fundamental right, the prohibition of self-incrimination deserves a proper study to her constitutional nature. For the definition of protected persons is important to build a material concept of accused, which is different of the formal concept over who is denounced on the prosecution. In the objective area of protection, there are two objects of protection of the norm: the instinct of self-preservation of the subject and the ability to self-determination. Configuring essentially a evidence rule in criminal procedure, the analysis of the case should be based on standards set previously to indicate respect for the right. These standard include the right to information of the accused, the right to counsel and respect the voluntary participation. The study of violations cases, concentrated on the element of voluntariness, starting from the definition of what is or is not a coercion violative of self-determination. The right faces new challenges that deserve attention, especially the fight against terrorism and organized crime that force the development of tools, resources and technologies about proves, methods increasingly invasive and hidden, and allow the use of information not only for criminal prosecution, but also for the establishment of an intelligence strategy in the development of national and public security

A efetivação do direito humano à paz por intermédio da Defensoria Pública: atuação em favor da vítima na presecução penal

Pós-graduação em Direito - FCHS