Syndrome d'apnées du sommeil: un risque pour l'anesthésie générale [Obstructive sleep apnea: a risk for general anesthesia?]

There are many case reports of serious complications and death among obstructive sleep apnea patients (OSA) during general anesthesia or postoperative analgesia. Sedatives and anesthetic agents, pharyngeal anatomy of these patients, opiates given for analgesia, and post operative REM sleep rebound represent potential hazards for general anesthesia in OSA patients. Ideally these patients should be treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during premedication, directly after extubation and during postoperative analgesia. Unfortunately, only about 20% of these patients are diagnosed before surgery. A special attention should be given to the symptoms and signs suggestive of OSA during preoperative visits. Screening tests should be performed in patients with suspected OSA and, if positive, a treatment should be initiated.

Incidents occuring during anesthesia for total hip arthroplasty: a comparison of general versus regional anaesthesia

Background: The type of anesthesia to be used for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is still a matter of debate. We compared the occurrence of per- and post-anesthesia incidents in patients receiving either general (GA) or regional anesthesia (RA). Methods: We used data from 29 hospitals, routinely collected in the Anaesthesia Databank Switzerland register between January 2001 and December 2003. We used multi-level logistic regression models. Results: There were more per- and post-anesthesia incidents under GA compared to RA (35.1% vs 32.7 %, n = 3191, and 23.1% vs 19.4%, n = 3258, respectively). In multi-level logistic regression analysis, RA was significantly associated with a lower incidence of per-anesthetic problems, especially hypertension, compared with GA. During the post-anesthetic period, RA was also less associated with pain. Conversely, RA was more associated with post-anesthetic hypotension, especially for epidural technique. In addition, age and ASA were more associated with incidents under GA compared to RA. Men were more associated with per-anesthetic problems under RA compared to GA. Whereas increased age (>67), gender (male), and ASA were linked with the choice of RA, we noticed that this choice depended also on hospital practices after we adjusted for the other variables. Conclusions: Compared to RA, GA was associated with an increased proportion of per- and post-anesthesia incidents. Although this study is only observational, it is rooted in daily practice. Whereas RA might be routinely proposed, GA might be indicated because of contraindications to RA, patients' preferences or other surgical or anaesthesiology related reasons. Finally, the choice of a type of anesthesia seems to depend on local practices that may differ between hospitals.

L'induction rapide du sevrage par des antagonistes des opiacés sous anesthésie: une alternative dans le traitement de la dépendance aux opiacés [Rapid induction of withdrawal with opiate antagonists under anesthesia: an alternative to treatment of opiate dependence?]

Rapid induction of withdrawal by opiate antagonists under anesthesia is an opiate detoxification technique. This technique is useful to reduce intensity and duration of withdrawal. Therefore, this technique represents an alternative strategy in the treatment of opiate addicted patients. This paper attempts to present a brief history of this technique, and a critical review of related issues.

Incidents occurring during anesthesia for total hip arthroplasty: a comparison of general versus regional anaesthesia

Background: The type of anesthesia to be used for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is still a matter of debate. We compared the occurrence of per- and post-anesthesia incidents in patients receiving either general (GA) or regional anesthesia (RA). Methods: We used data from 29 hospitals, routinely collected in the Anaesthesia Databank Switzerland register between January 2001 and December 2003. We used multi-level logistic regression models. Results: There were more per- and post-anesthesia incidents under GA compared to RA (35.1% vs 32.7 %, n = 3191, and 23.1% vs 19.4%, n = 3258, respectively). In multi-level logistic regression analysis, RA was significantly associated with a lower incidence of per-anesthetic problems, especially hypertension, compared with GA. During the post-anesthetic period, RA was also less associated with pain. Conversely, RA was more associated with post-anesthetic hypotension, especially for epidural technique. In addition, age and ASA were more associated with incidents under GA compared to RA. Men were more associated with per-anesthetic problems under RA compared to GA. Whereas increased age (>67), gender (male), and ASA were linked with the choice of RA, we noticed that this choice depended also on hospital practices after we adjusted for the other variables. Conclusions: Compared to RA, GA was associated with an increased proportion of per- and post-anesthesia incidents. Although this study is only observational, it is rooted in daily practice. Whereas RA might be routinely proposed, GA might be indicated because of contraindications to RA, patients' preferences or other surgical or anaesthesiology related reasons. Finally, the choice of a type of anesthesia seems to depend on local practices that may differ between hospitals.

Le sevrage ultra-rapide sous anesthésie générale: l'expérience de l'Hôpital de St-Loup [Ultrafast opiate detoxification under general anesthesia: the St. Loup Hospital experience]

Rapid antagonist induction under anesthesia is a method that has been increasingly used to detoxify opiate addicts. These procedures are useful to reduce the duration and the discomfort of withdrawal. However, the high risk and the cost of these methods require randomized clinical trial to evaluate safety and clinical effectiveness. The University Substance Abuse Division of Lausanne and the Intensive Care Unit of the St-Loup Hospital work on a randomized clinical trial comparing anesthesia-assisted versus traditional clonidine detoxification combined with an additional psychosocial week. This paper describes the technique of anesthesia used in our study. Our clinical experience suggests that, integrating this technique in a multidisciplinary network, with a strong emphasis on post-anesthetic follow-up, is a viable and safe option in the treatment of opiate dependence.

Ulnar nerve transposition at the elbow : local anesthesia should be preferred to general anesthesia

Après la compression du nerf médian au niveau du tunnel carpien, la compression du nerf ulnaire au niveau du coude est le deuxième syndrome compressif le plus fréquent des nerfs périphériques. La chirurgie des nerfs périphériques consiste dans une décompression nerveuse et est caractérisée par un suivi post¬opératoire parfois très douloureux avec des douleurs qui peuvent chroniciser si insuffisamment traitées. Le traitement chirurgical de décompression nerveuse se fait traditionnellement sous anesthésie générale ou régionale. Une analgésie post-opératoire plus efficace et durable avec moindre risque de chronicisation avait justifié ce choix jusqu'à ce jour. Grâce au développement de la chirurgie ambulatoire ces dernières années, un grand nombre d'interventions chirurgicales au niveau de la main sont effectués sous anesthésie locale. Au vu d'une meilleure connaissance de cette technique d'anesthésie, son rôle dans la chirurgie des nerfs périphériques a été remis en question. Alors que plusieurs études ont démontré que l'anesthésie locale est aussi efficace que l'anesthésie générale et régionale au sujet de la chirurgie du tunnel carpien, son utilisation pour la chirurgie du nerf ulnaire reste peu connue. La raison de l'hésitation à l'utilisation de l'anesthésie locale pour le traitement du tunnel ulnaire est due au fait que dans plus de la moitié des cas, une simple décompression n'est pas suffisante et qu'il est souvent nécessaire de transposer le nerf ulnaire devant l'épicondyle ulnaire. La seule publication disponible au sujet de l'utilisation de l'anesthésie locale dans le traitement du tunnel ulnaire considère comme irréalisable d'utiliser cette méthode dans le cas d'une transposition. Malgré cette mise en garde, nous avons, depuis plusieurs années, des excellents résultats avec la transposition du nerf ulnaire sous anesthésie locale. Avec le but d'objectiver notre expérience dans ce domaine nous avons souhaité analyser nos résultats de façon rétrospective avec particulière attention aux douleurs post-opératoires et à la satisfaction des patients. Les dossiers de cinquante patients Consécutifs (26F, 24M) opérés par le même chirurgien dans notre service de 2002 à 2012 ont été analysés rétrospectivement. Les critères suivants ont été récoltés: l'âge du patient, la profession, la main dominante, les détails des techniques opératoires utilisées, le type d'anesthésie, l'intensité du suivi ainsi que les complications, le niveau de douleur dans l'immédiat post-opératorie ainsi que à une année de l'intervention. Les patients ont été divisés en 4 groupes: les opérés sous anesthésie générale avec transposition du nerf (n=17) ou sans transposition (n=10) et les opérés sous anesthésie locale avec transposition (n=12) ou sans transposition (n=11). Au premier jour la douleur était comparable dans tous les groupes. A une semaine, elle était deux fois plus importante lorsque la transposition avait été réalisée sous anesthésie générale par rapport à si une anesthésie locale avait été effectuée (p=0.03). La satisfaction s'est révélée plus élevée mais non significative chez les patients opérés sous anesthésie locale. Ces derniers étaient significativement plus enclins à répéter la chirurgie comparé a ceux opérés sous anesthésie générale (p=0.04). En conclusion, les résultats de cette étude suggèrent que l'anesthésie locale est au moins autant efficace que l'anesthésie générale en termes de complications et de douleurs post-opératoires indépendamment du fait qu'une transposition nerveuse soit effectuée ou pas. Un meilleur contrôle des douleurs à une semaine post-opératoire a contribué à une haute satisfaction des patients de notre étude.

Department of Anesthesia. University of Iowa. Spring 2007, Volume 3.

University of Iowa Department of Anesthesia newsletter.

Department of Anesthesia. University of Iowa. Fall 2007, Volume 4.

University of Iowa Department of Anesthesia newsletter.

Department of Anesthesia. University of Iowa. Spring 2008, Volume 1.

University of Iowa Department of Anesthesia newsletter.

Department of Anesthesia. University of Iowa. Fall 2008.

University of Iowa Department of Anesthesia newsletter.

Department of Anesthesia. University of Iowa. Spring 2009.

University of Iowa Department of Anesthesia newsletter.

Department of Anesthesia. University of Iowa. Fall 2009.

University of Iowa Department of Anesthesia newsletter.