Yoruba nationalist movements, ethnic politics and violence : a creation from historical consciousness and socio-political space in South-western Nigeria /// Arbeitspapiere / Institut für Ethnologie und Afrikastudien ; 105

Since 1900, the Yoruba people of South-western Nigeria have put its ethnic history at work in the construction of its identity in Nigeria. The exercise resulted in the creation of ethno-nationalist movements and the practice of ethnic politics, often expressed through violent attacks on the Nigerian State and some ethnic groups in Nigeria. Relying on mythological attachment to its traditions and subjective creation of cultural pride, the people created a sense of history that established a common interest among different Yoruba sub-groups in form of pan-Yoruba interest which forms the basis for the people’s imagination of nation. Through this, historical consciousness and socio-political space in which Yoruba people are located acted as instrumental forces employed by Yoruba political elites, both at colonial and post-colonial periods to demand for increasing access to political and economic resources in Nigeria. In form of nationalism, nationalist movements and ethnic politics continued in South-western Nigeria since 1900, yet without resulting to actual creation of an independent Yoruba State up to 2009. Through ethnographic data, the part played by history, tradition and modernity is examined in this paper. While it is concluded that ethno-nationalist movement and ethnic politics in Yoruba society are constructive agenda dated back to pre-colonial period, it continues to transform both in structure and function. Thus, Yoruba ethno-nationalist movement and ethnic politics is ambiguous, dynamic and complex, to the extent that it remains a challenge to State actions in Nigeria.

Stabilimenti a rischio di incidente rilevante: Novità apportate dal D.Lgs. 105/2015

A partire dal 1° giugno 2015 è stato adottato ufficialmente in Europa il Regolamento 1272/2008/CE relativo alla classificazione, all'etichettatura e all'imballaggio delle sostanze e miscele pericolose, noto con il termine di Regolamento CLP. La data del 1° giugno 2015 coincide anche con il termine ultimo prescritto per il recepimento da parte degli Stati membri dell’Unione Europea della Direttiva 2012/18/UE sul controllo dei pericoli di incidenti rilevanti connessi con determinate sostanze pericolose. Dunque, come recepimento della sopracitata direttiva, il 29 luglio 2015 è stato emanato in Italia il D.Lgs. 105/2015, che ha introdotto numerose novità indotte non solo dalla direttiva da cui discende, ma anche e soprattutto dal fatto che il Legislatore italiano ha colto l’occasione per legiferare su alcuni aspetti attuativi della direttiva, così da produrre quello che viene identificato in ambito nazionale come Testo Unico per il rischio di incidente rilevante. La variazione più evidente apportata dal D.Lgs. 105/2015 rispetto alla norma precedente è l’adeguamento dell’allegato 1 al Regolamento CLP; l’allegato 1 elenca le sostanze e le categorie di sostanze pericolose con i corrispondenti valori soglia da utilizzare per valutare l’assoggettabilità degli stabilimenti al Decreto. A fronte dell’emanazione del D.Lgs. 105/2015, l’impatto dell’adeguamento è controverso e non noto a priori: nonostante la classificazione degli stabilimenti assoggettabili si mantenga sempre su due livelli, non è da escludersi il possibile passaggio di uno stabilimento da una situazione a rischio basso ad una a rischio alto o viceversa oil suo ingresso o la sua fuoriuscita dal campo di applicazione del Decreto. Altri elementi innovativi introdotti dal D.Lgs. 105/2015 sono relativi ai contenuti del Rapporto di Sicurezza, che deve essere redatto e trasmesso dai Gestori degli stabilimenti a maggior rischio: viene disposta per generici stabilimenti la possibilità di adottare per l’analisi preliminare del rischio metodologie alternative al metodo ad indici finora esclusivamente previsto dalla norma italiana. Inoltre, nel testo del D.Lgs. 105/2015 vengono ufficialmente indicati i riferimenti a due metodi semplificati (uno per il suolo e sottosuolo e uno per le acque superficiali) per la valutazione del rischio di contaminazione ambientale causato da rilasci rilevanti di idrocarburi liquidi e/o sostanze eco-tossiche da depositi. Per quanto riguarda il rischio di incidenti tecnologici innescati da fenomeni naturali (rischio NaTech), la nuova norma sancisce la libertà di scelta da parte dei Gestori della metodologia di valutazione da adottare con riferimento allo stato dell’arte in materia. Al fine di applicare una prima valutazione delle novità introdotte dal D.Lgs. 105/2015, si è considerata l’applicazione di alcune valutazioni previste dal Decreto a due casi di studio reali: come primo caso si è scelto uno Stabilimento che effettua principalmente l’attività di produzione e deposito nel settore degli esplosivi e come secondo caso uno Stabilimento che produce e confeziona prodotti per la nutrizione e difesa vegetale rappresentati per lo più da fertilizzanti organo-minerali e agrofarmaci.

Replacement of histidine in position 105 in the alpha(5) subunit by cysteine stimulates zolpidem sensitivity of alpha(5)beta(2)gamma(2) GABA(A) receptors

Zolpidem is a positive allosteric modulator of GABA(A) receptors with sensitivity to subunit composition. While it acts with high affinity and efficacy at GABA(A) receptors containing the alpha(1) subunit, it has a lower affinity to GABA(A) receptors containing alpha(2), alpha(3), or alpha(5) subunits and has a very weak efficacy at receptors containing the alpha(5) subunit. Here, we show that replacing histidine in position 105 in the alpha(5) subunit by cysteine strongly stimulates the effect of zolpidem in receptors containing the alpha(5) subunit. The side chain volume of the amino acid residue in this position does not correlate with the modulation by zolpidem. Interestingly, serine is not able to promote the potentiation by zolpidem. The homologous residues to alpha(5)H105 in alpha(1), alpha(2), and alpha(3) are well-known determinants of the action of classical benzodiazepines. Other studies have shown that replacement of these histidines alpha(1)H101, alpha(2)H101, and alpha(3)H126 by arginine, as naturally present in alpha(4) and alpha(6), leads to benzodiazepine insensitivity of these receptors. Thus, the nature of the amino acid residue in this position is not only crucial for the action of classical benzodiazepines but in alpha(5) containing receptors also for the action of zolpidem.

Ms. hebr. oct. 105 - Mafteaḥ dinim u-remazim

Vorbesitzer: Abraham Merzbacher

Ms. Barth. 105 - De bello, de repressaliis, et de duello

Vorbesitzer: Bartholomaeusstift Frankfurt am Main

§ 105 der octroyirten Verfassung: Jedem verständigen Menschen geht das Gewisse über das Ungewisse ...

Welsch (Projektbearbeiter): Ablehnung des Artikels 105 der oktroyierten Verfassung, der in dringenden Fällen und bei Abwesenheit der beiden Kammern dem Ministerium legislative Befugnisse einräumt

§ 105 der octroyirten Verfassung: Jedem verständigen Menschen geht das Gewisse über das Ungewisse ...

Welsch (Projektbearbeiter): Ablehnung des Artikels 105 der oktroyierten Verfassung, der in dringenden Fällen und bei Abwesenheit der beiden Kammern dem Ministerium legislative Befugnisse einräumt. Warnung vor den reaktionären Schriften, die in der Deckerschen Geheimen Ober-Hofbuchdruckerei erscheinen, als da sind: Neue Preußische Zeitung, Neues Preußisches Sonntagsblatt, das Volksblatt des Barons von Seld

Phenotypic plasticity is a negative, though weak, predictor of the commonness of 105 grassland species

Aim The usual hypothesis about the relationship between niche breadth and range size posits that species with the capacity to use a wider range of resources or to tolerate a greater range of environmental conditions should be more widespread. In plants, broader niches are often hypothesized to be due to pronounced phenotypic plasticity, and more plastic species are therefore predicted to be more common. We examined the relationship between the magnitude of phenotypic plasticity in five functional traits, mainly related to leaves, and several measures of abundance in 105 Central European grassland species. We further tested whether mean values of traits, rather than their plasticity, better explain the commonness of species, possibly because they are pre-adapted to exploiting the most common resources. Location Central Europe. Methods In a multispecies experiment with 105 species we measured leaf thickness, leaf greenness, specific leaf area, leaf dry matter content and plant height, and the plasticity of these traits in response to fertilization, waterlogging and shading. For the same species we also obtained five measures of commonness, ranging from plot-level abundance to range size in Europe. We then examined whether these measures of commonness were associated with the magnitude of phenotypic plasticity, expressed as composite plasticity of all traits across the experimental treatments. We further estimated the relative importance of trait plasticity and trait means for abundance and geographical range size. Results More abundant species were less plastic. This negative relationship was fairly consistent across several spatial scales of commonness, but it was weak. Indeed, compared with trait means, plasticity was relatively unimportant for explaining differences in species commonness. Main conclusions Our results do not indicate that larger phenotypic plasticity of leaf morphological traits enhances species abundance. Furthermore, possession of a particular trait value, rather than of trait plasticity, is a more important determinant of species commonness.

Na 1 Nachlass Max Horkheimer, 333 - Korrespondenzen u.a. mit Siegfried Kracauer (p. V 105, 137-208)

57 Briefe und Beilage zwischen Kreuz-Verlag und Max Horkheimer, 1965-1973, sowie Manuskripte von 2 Rundfunksendungen:; a) Ansgar Skriver: Israel im Frühjahr, 1965; b) Reimar Lenz: Zersetzung, Diagnose eines epidemischen Begriffs, 1965; 17 Briefe und Beilage zwischen Professor Gerhard [u. Erna] Krüger und Max Horkheimer, 1952-1955;

Na 1 Nachlass Max Horkheimer, 105 - Korrespondenzen u.a. mit Bertold Scheller und Alfred Schmidt (p. III 12, 175-380)

Briefwechsel zwischen Bertold Scheller und Max Horkheimer, 1955; Briefwechsel zwischen dem Diplom-Volkswirt Albert Schiefer und Max Horkheimer, 1957; Briefwechsel zwischen dem Bayerischer Schulbuch-Verlag und Max Horkheimer, 1954; Briefwechsel mit Beilagen zwischen der Deutschen Schlafwagen- und Speisewagen-Gesellschaft und Max Horkheimer, 1954; 1 Brief von Ludwig Benedict Schlesinger an Max Horkheimer, 1958; 1 Brief von dem Professor Alfred Schmidt an Max Horkheimer, 1957 und 1 Gutachten von Max Horkheimer, 1958; 1 Brief von Hermann Schweppenhäuser an Max Horkheimer, 1957; Briefwechsel zwischen W. Schmidt-Richberg und Max Horkheimer, 1957-1958; Briefwechsel zwischen Alfred Schmidweber und Max Horkheimer, 1956; 1 Brief von Katja Schmitz? an Max Horkheimer, 1955; Briefwechsel zwischen der Studentin Elsmarie Schmitz und Max Horkheimer, 1958; Briefwechsel zwischen dem Professor Günter Schmölders und Max Horkheimer, 1957-1958; 1 Brief an Diplom-Volkswirt Helmut Schneider von Max Horkheimer, 1955; Briefwechsel zwischen Marianne Schneider und Max Horkheimer, 1955-1956; Briefwechsel zwischen Georg von Schnitzler und Max Horkheimer, 1954; 1 Todenanzeige von Louis Schnürpel, 1956; Briefwechsel zwischen Roman Schnur und Max Horkheimer, 1955-1958; 1 Brief mit Anlagen an Günter P. Schölzel von Max Horkheimer, 1958; Briefwechsel zwischen Hans W. Schoenberg und Max Horkheimer, 1955; 1 Anzeige von Arnold Schoenberg, 1955; Briefwechsel zwischen der Studentin Annemarie Schöne und Max Horkheimer, 1956; Briefwechsel zwischen dem Professor Hans Joachim Schoeps und Max Horkheimer, 1955-1956; 1 Brief an den Professor Rudolf Schottlaender von Max Horkheimer, 1955; 1 Anzeige von Joachim Schroeter, 1955; Briefwechsel zwischen Karl Schück und Max Horkheimer, 1954; Briefwechsel zwischen Julia von der Schulenburg und Max Horkheimer, 1957; Briefwechsel zwischen dem Bankdirektor Felix W. Schulthess und Max Horkheimer, 1955; 1 Brief an den Privatdozent Walter Schulz von Max Horkheimer, 1954; Briefwechsel mit Beilagen zwischen dem Bürgermeister Wolfgang Schwabe und Max Horkheimer, 1954; Breifwechsel mit Beilagen zwischen Hans Schwalbach und Max Horkheimer, 1954; Briefwechsel mit Beilagen zwischen Poldi Schwalbach und Max Horkheimer, 1954; 1 Brief von Louis Daniel Schwallbach an Max Horkheimer, 1955; Briefwechsel zwischen Dorothea de Schweinitz und Max Horkheimer, 1958; 1 Aktennotiz von Hans Zulliger, 1956; Briefwechsel zwischen William Schwitzer und Max Horkheimer, 1954; Briefwechsel zwischen Karl von Stackelberg und Max Horkheimer, 1954; 1 Brief von Clemens Köttelwesch und Max Horkheimer, 1957; 1 Brief von dem Oberlandesgerichtspräsidenten Bruno Heusinger an Max Horkheimer, 1954; Briefwechsel zwischen dem Oberstadtdirektor Erich Walter Lotz und Max Horkheimer, 1953-1954; Briefwechsel zwischen der Stadtverwaltung Iserlohn und Max Horkheimer, 1954; Briefwechsel mit Beilagen zwischen dem Diplom Ingenieur und Oberbaurat Julius Schwalm und Max Horkheimer, 1954; 1 Brief an den Professor Herbert Plügge von Max Horkheimer, 1957; Briefwechsel zwischen den Professor und Oberlandesgerichtspräsidenten Curt Staffund Max Horkheimer, 1956-1957; 1 Brief von dem Professor B. M. Stanfield an Max Horkheimer, 1957; 1 Vermählungsanzeige von den Professor Dietrich Starck, 1956 und 1 Brief an den Professor Dietrich Starck von Max Horkheimer, 1958; Briefwechsel zwischen den Professor Werner Stark und Max Horkheimer, 1958; Briefwechsel mit Beilagen zwischen Rolf Stätter und Max Horkheimer, 1954; 1 Brief von Karl Staufen an Max Horkheimer, 1952; 1 Brief von Direktor Adolf Stauss an Max Horkheimer, 1954; Briefwechsel zwischen dem Bankier Alwin Steffan und Max Horkheimer, 1954-1957; 2 Briefe an den Professor Wolfgang Stegmüller von Max Horkheimer, 1957; Briefwechsel zwischen dem Professor und MinisterErwin Stein und Max Horkheimer, 1956-1957; 1 Brief an Lotte Steinberger von Max Horkheimer, 1954; 1 Brief von Ernst Steindorf an Max Horkheimer, ohne Jahr; Briefwechsel zwischen Helmut von den Steinen und Max Horkheimer, 1955 und 1 Brief an Helmut von den Steinen von Theodor W. Adorno, 1955; Briefwechsel zwischen den Professor Hans Erich Stier, 1958; Briefwechsel zwischen Elsbeth Stocker und Max Horkheimer, 1955; Briefwechsel zwischen Eric W. Stoetzner und Max Horkheimer, 1957-1958; Briefwechsel zwischen Gertrud Straulino und Max Horkheimer, 1957-1958; Briefwechsel zwischen den Professor Siegfried Strugger und Max Horkheimer, 1955; Briefwechsel mit Beilagen zwischen Willy Strzelewicz und Max Horkheimer, 1955-1957; Briefwechsel mit Beilagen zwischen der Studentenschaft der Universität Köln und Max Horkheimer, 1953;

Na 50 Nachlass Arthur Schopenhauer - 'Schopenhauer-Archiv', 105 - Dankesschreiben nach dem Erhalt eines Geschenks

veröffentlicht in: Schopenhauer, Arthur : Arthur Schopenhauers sämtliche Werke - München : Piper - Bd. 14 : Der Briefwechsel Arthur Schopenhauers ; 1 (1799 - 1849), Nr. 37;

Ms. Praed. 105 - Vocabularius Ex quo

Vorbesitzer: Georg von Breidenbach; Dominikanerkloster Frankfurt am Main